A nomogram-based immunoprofile predicts clinical outcomes for stage II and III human colorectal cancer.

An immunoscore for colorectal cancer (CRC) has higher prognostic significance than the TNM staging system. However, the tumor immune microenvironment contains various components that affect clinical prognosis. Therefore, a broader range of immune markers is required to establish an accurate immunoprofile to assess the prognosis of patients with CRC. Using immunohistochemistry combined with multispectral immunohistochemistry and objective assessments, the infiltration of four immune cell types (CD4/CD8/forkhead box p3/CD33 cells), as well as the expression of six co-signaling molecules [programmed cell death 1 (PD1) ligand 1/PD1/T-cell immunoglobulin mucin family member 3/lymphocyte-activating 3/tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 4/inducible T-cell costimulator] and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 were investigated in two independent cohorts of CRC. The patients' overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, independent prognostic factors of patients were assessed and a nomogram-based immunoprofile system was developed. The predictive ability of the nomogram was determined using a concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. To facilitate clinical application, a simplified nomogram-based immunoprofile was constructed. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the predictive accuracy for OS was compared between the immunoprofile and the TNM staging system for patients with stage II/III CRC. According to multivariate analysis for the primary cohort, independent prognostic factors for OS were CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD33 myeloid-derived suppressor cells and TNM stage, which were included in the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting OS was 0.861 (95% CI: 0.796-0.925) for the internal validation and 0.759 (95% CI: 0.714-0.804) for the external validation cohort. The simplified nomogram-based immunoprofile system was able to separate same-stage patients into different risk subgroups, particularly for TNM stage II (P<0.0001) and III (P=0.0002) patients. Pairwise comparison of ROC curves for the immunoprofile and TNM stage systems for patients with stage II/III CRC revealed statistically significant differences (P=0.046) and the Z-statistic value was 1.995. In conclusion, the nomogram-based immunoprofile system provides prognostic accuracy regarding clinical outcomes and is a useful supplement to the TNM staging system for patients with stage II/III CRC.