Ziyad Tareq A, Abu-Naba'a Layla A, Almohammed Saleh N
PROSTHODONTICS Program, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Department of Prosthodontics, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 9;7(10):e08151. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08151. eCollection 2021 Oct.
this investigation aims to evaluate and compare optical properties of three types of esthetic CAD-CAM monolithic multi-layered zirconia materials with a control (conventional lithium disilicate, IPS e. max CAD).
Four monolithic CAD-CAM ceramic materials were investigated: Ceramill Zolid® FX Multilayer (ZF), IPS e. max® ZirCAD MT Multi (ZM), Katana® STML (KS) and one lithium disilicate glass-ceramics as a control (IPS e. max® CAD LT; LC). A total of 72 (15 × 15 × 1 mm) samples were CAD CAM fabricated and sintered based on sample-size power calculations, and each material comprised 18 samples. The translucency and opalescence parameters with the contrast ratio were evaluated with a dental spectrophotometer over the backgrounds of black and white. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, then Bonferroni post hoc comparison test was made between groups. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Zirconia materials revealed lower optical properties than the lithium disilicate control LC (P < 0.05). TP values ranged from 14.174 to 20.439. No differences were detected between the zirconia products in terms of TP and CR (P = 1.000). OP values ranged from 5.068 to 10.097. The lowest OP values were found statistically significant for ZF followed by KS and ZM (P = 1.000). LC had the highest TP and OP values, as well as the lowest CR (p < 0.05).
The optical properties of monolithic zirconia systems tested here are still lower than those of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. The only difference observed between the monolithic CAD CAM zirconia materials, was for the low opalescence parameter for the ZF.
Multi-layered monolithic zirconia systems have better esthetics by shade layers resembling natural tooth color gradients. CAD-CAM technology allowed for in-office milling and shaping of restorations using these systems. This study reports on their optical properties affecting human vision/perception of natural tooth shade to conclude about their use in the esthetic zones.
本研究旨在评估并比较三种美学CAD-CAM整体多层氧化锆材料与一种对照材料(传统二硅酸锂,IPS e.max CAD)的光学性能。
研究了四种整体CAD-CAM陶瓷材料:Ceramill Zolid® FX Multilayer(ZF)、IPS e.max® ZirCAD MT Multi(ZM)、Katana® STML(KS),以及一种作为对照的二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max® CAD LT;LC)。根据样本量功效计算,通过CAD CAM制作并烧结了总共72个(15×15×1毫米)样本,每种材料包含18个样本。使用牙科分光光度计在黑色和白色背景下评估了透明度、乳光参数以及对比度。数据通过方差分析进行分析,然后在组间进行Bonferroni事后比较检验。设定统计学显著性为p < 0.05。
氧化锆材料的光学性能低于二硅酸锂对照材料LC(P < 0.05)。TP值范围为14.174至20.439。在TP和CR方面,氧化锆产品之间未检测到差异(P = 1.000)。OP值范围为5.068至10.097。在统计学上,ZF的OP值最低,其次是KS和ZM(P = 1.000)。LC的TP和OP值最高,CR最低(p < 0.05)。
此处测试的整体氧化锆系统的光学性能仍低于二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷。在整体CAD CAM氧化锆材料之间观察到的唯一差异是ZF的乳光参数较低。
多层整体氧化锆系统通过类似天然牙齿颜色梯度的遮色层具有更好的美学效果。CAD-CAM技术允许使用这些系统在诊所内对修复体进行研磨和塑形。本研究报告了它们影响人类视觉/对天然牙齿颜色感知的光学性能,以得出它们在美学区域使用的结论。