Lee Yong-Keun
Institute for Clinical Performance of Biomaterials (ICPB) and ETN Dental Clinic, 106-B101, 27 Heukseokhangang-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06981, Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2015 Oct 28;8(11):7241-7249. doi: 10.3390/ma8115379.
Translucency of dental ceramics, esthetic posts and orthodontic brackets was reviewed. Translucency parameter () and contrast ratio () are generally used for translucency evaluation. For the evaluation of translucency, two criteria such as the translucency of human teeth ( = 15-19, 1 mm thick) and the visual perceptibility threshold for the translucency difference (∆ > 0.07 or ∆ > 2) were used. In ceramics, translucency differences were in the perceptible range depending on the type of material and the thickness. However, variations caused by the difference in the required thickness for each layer by the material and also by the measurement protocols should be considered. As to the translucency of esthetic posts, a significant difference was found among the post systems. Translucency was influenced by the bracket composition and brand, and the differences by the brand were visually perceptible.
对牙科陶瓷、美学桩和正畸托槽的半透明性进行了综述。半透明性参数()和对比度()通常用于半透明性评估。对于半透明性的评估,使用了两个人类牙齿半透明性标准(=15-19,厚度为1毫米)和半透明性差异的视觉感知阈值(∆>0.07或∆>2)。在陶瓷中,根据材料类型和厚度,半透明性差异在可感知范围内。然而,应考虑材料每层所需厚度差异以及测量方案所导致的变化。至于美学桩的半透明性,在桩系统之间发现了显著差异。半透明性受托槽成分和品牌的影响,品牌之间的差异在视觉上是可感知的。