Pflüger Lisa Sophie, Nörz Dominik, Volz Tassilo, Giersch Katja, Giese Annika, Goldmann Nora, Glebe Dieter, Bockmann Jan-Hendrik, Pfefferle Susanne, Dandri Maura, Schulze Zur Wiesch Julian, Lütgehetmann Marc
Center for Diagnostics, Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
I. Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
JHEP Rep. 2021 Aug 28;3(6):100356. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100356. eCollection 2021 Dec.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Currently available HDV PCR assays are characterized by considerable run-to-run and inter-laboratory variability. Hence, we established a quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay on the open channel of a fully automated PCR platform (cobas6800, Roche) offering improved consistency and reliability.
A primer/probe-set targeting a highly conserved region upstream of the HDV antigen was adapted for use on the cobas6800. The lower limit of detection (LLOD) was determined using a dilution panel of the HDV WHO standard (n = 21/dilution). Linearity and inclusivity were tested by preparing 10-fold dilution series of cell culture-derived virus (genotype [GT]1-8; n = 5/dilution). Patient samples containing a variety of bloodborne viral pathogens were tested to confirm exclusivity (n = 60).
The LLOD of the HDV utility-channel (HDV_UTC) assay was determined as 3.86 IU/ml (95% CI 2.95-5.05 IU/ml) with a linear range from 10-10ˆ8 IU/ml (GT1). Linear relationships were observed for all HDV GTs with slopes ranging from -3.481 to -4.134 cycles/log and R from 0.918 to 0.994. Inter-run and intra-run variability were 0.3 and 0.6 Ct (3xLLOD), respectively. No false-positive results were observed. To evaluate clinical performance, 110 serum samples of anti-HDV-Ab+ patients were analyzed using the HDV_UTC and CE-IVD RoboGene assays. 58/110 and 49/110 samples were concordant positive or negative, respectively (overall agreement 97.3%). Quantitative comparison demonstrated a strong correlation (R 0.8733; 95% CI 0.8914-0.9609; value <0.0001).
The use of highly automated, sample-to-result solutions for molecular diagnostics holds many inherent benefits over manual workflows, including improved reliability, reproducibility and dynamic scaling of testing capacity. The assay we established showed excellent analytical and clinical performance, with inclusivity for all HDV GTs and a limit of quantification of 10 IU/ml, making it a sensitive new tool for HDV screening and viral load monitoring.
The hepatitis delta virus (HDV) causes a severe form of inflammation in the liver. We developed a tool for molecular diagnostics, a polymerase chain reaction HDV assay that showed great performance. It can be used to improve diagnosis of HDV, as well as for monitoring treatment responses. The assay allows for quantification of the virus in the tested samples and is performed on a fully automated platform (cobas6800), which provides various benefits including less hands-on time and excellent comparability of test results.
目前可用的丁型肝炎病毒(HDV)聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法具有显著的批间和实验室间差异。因此,我们在全自动PCR平台(cobas6800,罗氏公司)的开放通道上建立了定量逆转录实时PCR(RT-qPCR)检测方法,该方法具有更高的一致性和可靠性。
针对HDV抗原上游高度保守区域设计的引物/探针组适用于cobas6800。使用HDV世界卫生组织标准的稀释样本组(n = 21/稀释度)确定检测下限(LLOD)。通过制备细胞培养衍生病毒的10倍稀释系列(基因型[GT]1 - 8;n = 5/稀释度)来测试线性和包容性。对含有多种血源性病原体的患者样本进行检测以确认排他性(n = 60)。
HDV实用通道(HDV_UTC)检测方法的LLOD确定为3.86 IU/ml(95%置信区间2.95 - 5.05 IU/ml),线性范围为10 - 10ˆ8 IU/ml(GT1)。观察到所有HDV基因型的线性关系,斜率范围为 - 3.481至 - 4.134个循环/对数,R值范围为0.918至0.994。批间和批内变异分别为0.3和0.6 Ct(3倍LLOD)。未观察到假阳性结果。为评估临床性能,使用HDV_UTC和CE-IVD RoboGene检测方法分析了110份抗HDV抗体阳性患者的血清样本。分别有58/110和49/110份样本结果一致为阳性或阴性(总体一致性97.3%)。定量比较显示出强相关性(R 0.8733;95%置信区间0.8914 - 0.9609;P值<0.0001)。
与手动工作流程相比,使用高度自动化的样本到结果解决方案进行分子诊断具有许多内在优势,包括更高的可靠性、可重复性和检测能力的动态扩展。我们建立的检测方法显示出优异的分析和临床性能,对所有HDV基因型具有包容性,定量限为10 IU/ml,使其成为HDV筛查和病毒载量监测的灵敏新工具。
丁型肝炎病毒(HDV)可导致肝脏严重炎症。我们开发了一种分子诊断工具,即一种表现出色的HDV聚合酶链反应检测方法。它可用于改善HDV的诊断以及监测治疗反应。该检测方法可对测试样本中的病毒进行定量,并且在全自动平台(cobas6800)上进行,具有诸多优势,包括更少的人工操作时间和优异的检测结果可比性。