• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能虚拟助手对药物名称的理解:2019年至2021年亚马逊Alexa、谷歌助手和苹果Siri的比较

Medication Name Comprehension of Intelligent Virtual Assistants: A Comparison of Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple Siri Between 2019 and 2021.

作者信息

Palanica Adam, Fossat Yan

机构信息

Klick Applied Sciences, Klick Health, Klick Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Digit Health. 2021 May 19;3:669971. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.669971. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2021.669971
PMID:34713143
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8521933/
Abstract

The current study was a replication and comparison of our previous research which examined the comprehension accuracy of popular intelligent virtual assistants, including Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple Siri for recognizing the generic and brand names of the top 50 most dispensed medications in the United States. Using the exact same voice recordings from 2019, audio clips of 46 participants were played back to each device in 2021. Google Assistant achieved the highest comprehension accuracy for both brand medication names (86.0%) and generic medication names (84.3%), followed by Apple Siri (brand names = 78.4%, generic names = 75.0%), and the lowest accuracy by Amazon Alexa (brand names 64.2%, generic names = 66.7%). These findings represent the same trend of results as our previous research, but reveal significant increases of ~10-24% in performance for Amazon Alexa and Apple Siri over the past 2 years. This indicates that the artificial intelligence software algorithms have improved to better recognize the speech characteristics of complex medication names, which has important implications for telemedicine and digital healthcare services.

摘要

本研究是对我们之前研究的重复和比较,之前的研究考察了包括亚马逊Alexa、谷歌助手和苹果Siri在内的流行智能虚拟助手识别美国最常用的50种处方药通用名和品牌名的理解准确率。使用2019年完全相同的语音记录,2021年将46名参与者的音频片段播放给每个设备。谷歌助手在品牌药名(86.0%)和通用药名(84.3%)方面的理解准确率最高,其次是苹果Siri(品牌名=78.4%,通用名=75.0%),而亚马逊Alexa的准确率最低(品牌名64.2%,通用名=66.7%)。这些发现与我们之前的研究结果趋势相同,但显示在过去两年中,亚马逊Alexa和苹果Siri的性能显著提高了约10-24%。这表明人工智能软件算法已经改进,能够更好地识别复杂药名的语音特征,这对远程医疗和数字医疗服务具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/8521933/bbd29d2e1f7b/fdgth-03-669971-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/8521933/da76a52109d9/fdgth-03-669971-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/8521933/bbd29d2e1f7b/fdgth-03-669971-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/8521933/da76a52109d9/fdgth-03-669971-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fac/8521933/bbd29d2e1f7b/fdgth-03-669971-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Medication Name Comprehension of Intelligent Virtual Assistants: A Comparison of Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple Siri Between 2019 and 2021.智能虚拟助手对药物名称的理解:2019年至2021年亚马逊Alexa、谷歌助手和苹果Siri的比较
Front Digit Health. 2021 May 19;3:669971. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.669971. eCollection 2021.
2
Do you understand the words that are comin outta my mouth? Voice assistant comprehension of medication names.你能听懂我嘴里说出的话吗?语音助手对药物名称的理解。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 20;2:55. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0133-x. eCollection 2019.
3
Virtual Assistants' Response to Queries About Nicotine Replacement Therapy: A Mixed-Method Analysis.虚拟助手对尼古丁替代疗法相关问题的回应:一项混合方法分析。
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Jun;48(2):174-181. doi: 10.1177/01632787241235689. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
4
Clinical Advice by Voice Assistants on Postpartum Depression: Cross-Sectional Investigation Using Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Microsoft Cortana.基于产后抑郁的语音助手临床建议:使用苹果 Siri、亚马逊 Alexa、谷歌助手和微软 Cortana 的横断面调查
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):e24045. doi: 10.2196/24045.
5
Evaluating the quality of voice assistants' responses to consumer health questions about vaccines: an exploratory comparison of Alexa, Google Assistant and Siri.评估语音助手对消费者有关疫苗的健康问题的回答质量:对Alexa、谷歌助手和Siri的探索性比较。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Nov;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100075.
6
Health and Fitness Apps for Hands-Free Voice-Activated Assistants: Content Analysis.适用于免提语音激活助手的健康与健身应用程序:内容分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Sep 24;6(9):e174. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9705.
7
The accuracy of artificial intelligence-based virtual assistants in responding to routinely asked questions about orthodontics.人工智能虚拟助手在回答正畸常见问题方面的准确性。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Jul 1;93(4):427-432. doi: 10.2319/100922-691.1.
8
Voice Assistants as Consultants for Male Patients with Sexual Dysfunction: A Reliable Option?语音助手作为男性性功能障碍患者的顾问:可靠的选择吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032612.
9
Voice Assistants and Cancer Screening: A Comparison of Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant, and Cortana.语音助手与癌症筛查:亚马逊Alexa、苹果Siri、谷歌Assistant和微软Cortana的比较
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Sep-Oct;19(5):447-449. doi: 10.1370/afm.2713.
10
Reliability of Commercial Voice Assistants' Responses to Health-Related Questions in Noncommunicable Disease Management: Factorial Experiment Assessing Response Rate and Source of Information.商业语音助手在非传染性疾病管理中对健康相关问题回答的可靠性:评估回答率和信息来源的析因实验
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e32161. doi: 10.2196/32161.

引用本文的文献

1
Histological Image Classification Between Follicular Lymphoma and Reactive Lymphoid Tissue Using Deep Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).使用深度学习和可解释人工智能(XAI)对滤泡性淋巴瘤和反应性淋巴组织进行组织学图像分类
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 22;17(15):2428. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152428.
2
Virtual Assistants' Response to Queries About Nicotine Replacement Therapy: A Mixed-Method Analysis.虚拟助手对尼古丁替代疗法相关问题的回应:一项混合方法分析。
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Jun;48(2):174-181. doi: 10.1177/01632787241235689. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Redefining Virtual Assistants in Health Care: The Future With Large Language Models.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Advice by Voice Assistants on Postpartum Depression: Cross-Sectional Investigation Using Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Microsoft Cortana.基于产后抑郁的语音助手临床建议:使用苹果 Siri、亚马逊 Alexa、谷歌助手和微软 Cortana 的横断面调查
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):e24045. doi: 10.2196/24045.
2
Readiness for voice assistants to support healthcare delivery during a health crisis and pandemic.语音助手在健康危机和大流行期间支持医疗服务的准备情况。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 16;3:122. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00332-0. eCollection 2020.
3
Responses to addiction help-seeking from Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant, Cortana, and Bixby intelligent virtual assistants.
重新定义医疗保健中的虚拟助手:大语言模型的未来。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 19;26:e53225. doi: 10.2196/53225.
4
Towards Ideal Health Ecosystem With Artificial Intelligence-Driven Medical Services in India: An Overview.印度利用人工智能驱动的医疗服务迈向理想健康生态系统:概述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 8;15(11):e48482. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48482. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
The accuracy of artificial intelligence-based virtual assistants in responding to routinely asked questions about orthodontics.人工智能虚拟助手在回答正畸常见问题方面的准确性。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Jul 1;93(4):427-432. doi: 10.2319/100922-691.1.
6
The Answer Bot Effect (ABE): A powerful new form of influence made possible by intelligent personal assistants and search engines.答案生成机器人效应(ABE):一种由智能个人助理和搜索引擎带来的强大的新型影响力形式。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268081. eCollection 2022.
7
"Hey Siri, Help Me Take Care of My Child": A Feasibility Study With Caregivers of Children With Special Healthcare Needs Using Voice Interaction and Automatic Speech Recognition in Remote Care Management.“嘿 Siri,帮我照顾我的孩子”:一项针对有特殊医疗需求儿童照顾者的可行性研究,使用语音交互和自动语音识别进行远程护理管理。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;10:849322. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.849322. eCollection 2022.
8
Reliability of Commercial Voice Assistants' Responses to Health-Related Questions in Noncommunicable Disease Management: Factorial Experiment Assessing Response Rate and Source of Information.商业语音助手在非传染性疾病管理中对健康相关问题回答的可靠性:评估回答率和信息来源的析因实验
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e32161. doi: 10.2196/32161.
对来自Alexa、Siri、谷歌助手、Cortana和Bixby智能虚拟助手的成瘾求助响应。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jan 29;3:11. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0215-9. eCollection 2020.
4
Do you understand the words that are comin outta my mouth? Voice assistant comprehension of medication names.你能听懂我嘴里说出的话吗?语音助手对药物名称的理解。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 20;2:55. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0133-x. eCollection 2019.
5
Patient and Consumer Safety Risks When Using Conversational Assistants for Medical Information: An Observational Study of Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant.使用对话式助手获取医疗信息时的患者和消费者安全风险:对Siri、Alexa和谷歌助手的观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 4;20(9):e11510. doi: 10.2196/11510.
6
Comprehension of Top 200 Prescribed Drugs in the US as a Resource for Pharmacy Teaching, Training and Practice.美国200种常用处方药解读:作为药学教学、培训及实践的资源
Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 May 14;6(2):43. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6020043.
7
Just ask Siri? A pilot study comparing smartphone digital assistants and laptop Google searches for smoking cessation advice.仅需询问 Siri 即可?一项比较智能手机数字助手和笔记本电脑谷歌搜索戒烟建议的初步研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194811. eCollection 2018.
8
Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and More: An Introduction to Voice Assistants.Alexa、Siri、Cortana 及其他:语音助手介绍。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Jan-Mar;37(1):81-88. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2018.1404391.
9
Voice-controlled virtual assistants for the older people with visual impairment.面向视力障碍老年人的语音控制虚拟助手。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Jan;32(1):53-54. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.165. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Smartphone-Based Conversational Agents and Responses to Questions About Mental Health, Interpersonal Violence, and Physical Health.基于智能手机的对话代理以及对心理健康、人际暴力和身体健康相关问题的回应。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 May 1;176(5):619-25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0400.