Suppr超能文献

以社区为基础的差异化服务提供模式,将抗逆转录病毒治疗的多剂量配给纳入其中,适用于每年仅接受一次临床就诊的新稳定期 HIV 感染者:南部非洲两项集群随机试验的汇总分析。

Community-based differentiated service delivery models incorporating multi-month dispensing of antiretroviral treatment for newly stable people living with HIV receiving single annual clinical visits: a pooled analysis of two cluster-randomized trials in southern Africa.

机构信息

Kheth'Impilo AIDS Free Living, Cape Town, South Africa.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Oct;24 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):e25819. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25819.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment decrease health facility visit frequency and limit healthcare facility-based exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, two important evidence gaps include understanding DSD effectiveness amongst clients commencing DSD within 12 months of antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation and amongst clients receiving only single annual clinical consultations. To investigate these, we pooled data from two cluster-randomized trials investigating community-based DSD in Zimbabwe and Lesotho.

METHODS

Individual-level participant data of newly stable adults enrolled between 6 and 12 months after ART initiation were pooled. Both trials (conducted between August 2017 and July 2019) had three arms: Standard-of-care three-monthly ART provision at healthcare facilities (SoC, control); ART provided three-monthly in community ART groups (CAGs) (3MC) and ART provided six-monthly in either CAGs or at community-distribution points (6MC). Clinical visits were three-monthly in SoC and annually in intervention arms. The primary outcome was retention in care and secondary outcomes were viral suppression (VS) and number of unscheduled facility visits 12 months after enrolment. Individual-level regression analyses were conducted by intention-to-treat specifying for clustering and adjusted for country.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 599 participants were included; 212 (35.4%), 128 (21.4%) and 259 (43.2%) in SoC, 3MC and 6MC, respectively. Few participants aged <25 years were included (n = 32). After 12 months, 198 (93.4%), 123 (96.1%) and 248 (95.8%) were retained in SoC, 3MC and 6MC, respectively. Retention in 3MC was superior versus SoC, adjusted risk difference (aRD) = 4.6% (95% CI: 0.7%-8.5%). Retention in 6MC was non-inferior versus SoC, aRD = 1.7% (95% CI: -2.5%-5.9%) (prespecified non-inferiority aRD margin -3.25%). VS was similar between arms, 99.3, 98.6 and 98.1% in SoC, 3MC and 6MC, respectively. Adjusted risk ratio's for VS were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92-1.03) for 3MC versus SoC, and 0.98 (CI: 0.95-1.00) for 6MC versus SoC. Unscheduled clinic visits were not increased in intervention arms: incidence rate ratio = 0.53 (CI: 0.16-1.80) for 3MC versus SoC; and 0.82 (CI: 0.25-2.79) for 6MC versus SoC.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based DSD incorporating three- and six-monthly ART refills and single annual clinical visits were at least non-inferior to standard facility-based care amongst newly stable ART clients aged ≥25 years. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03238846 & NCT03438370.

摘要

简介

差异化服务交付 (DSD) 模型可减少艾滋病毒治疗的就诊频率,并限制在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 下对医疗设施的接触。然而,仍存在两个重要的证据缺口,包括了解在开始抗逆转录病毒治疗 (ART) 后 12 个月内开始接受 DSD 的患者中的 DSD 有效性,以及在仅接受每年一次临床咨询的患者中的 DSD 有效性。为了调查这些问题,我们汇集了两项在津巴布韦和莱索托进行的社区为基础的 DSD 研究的集群随机试验数据。

方法

纳入在开始 ART 后 6 至 12 个月之间新稳定的成年人的个体参与者数据。这两项试验(分别于 2017 年 8 月至 2019 年 7 月进行)有三个臂:在医疗机构进行的标准护理每三个月一次的 ART 供应(SoC,对照组);在社区 ART 小组中每三个月提供一次的 ART(3MC)和在社区分发点或 CAG 中每六个月提供一次的 ART(6MC)。SoC 中的临床就诊每三个月进行一次,干预组中的临床就诊每年进行一次。主要结局是保留在护理中,次要结局是病毒抑制 (VS) 和登记后 12 个月未预约的就诊次数。通过意向治疗进行个体水平的回归分析,指定聚类,并根据国家进行调整。

结果与讨论

共纳入 599 名参与者;SoC、3MC 和 6MC 组分别有 212 名(35.4%)、128 名(21.4%)和 259 名(43.2%)参与者。纳入的年龄<25 岁的参与者很少(n = 32)。12 个月后,SoC、3MC 和 6MC 组分别有 198 名(93.4%)、123 名(96.1%)和 248 名(95.8%)患者保留在护理中。3MC 组的保留率优于 SoC,调整后的风险差异(aRD)=4.6%(95%CI:0.7%-8.5%)。6MC 组与 SoC 相比,保留率非劣效,aRD = 1.7%(95%CI:-2.5%-5.9%)(预设非劣效性 aRD 范围 -3.25%)。各臂之间的 VS 相似,SoC、3MC 和 6MC 组的 VS 分别为 99.3%、98.6%和 98.1%。3MC 与 SoC 相比,VS 的调整风险比为 0.98(95%CI:0.92-1.03),6MC 与 SoC 相比,VS 的调整风险比为 0.98(CI:0.95-1.00)。干预组的未预约就诊次数没有增加:3MC 与 SoC 相比,发病率比=0.53(CI:0.16-1.80);6MC 与 SoC 相比,发病率比=0.82(CI:0.25-2.79)。

结论

在新稳定的年龄≥25 岁的接受 ART 治疗的患者中,以社区为基础的 DSD 结合每三个月和六个月的 ART 补给和每年一次的临床就诊,至少不劣于标准的基于设施的护理。临床试验注册:NCT03238846 & NCT03438370。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/388d/8554219/55626432f66f/JIA2-24-e25819-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验