Médecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Dec;23(12):e25649. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25649.
The antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence club (AC) model has supported clinically stable HIV patients' retention with group ART refills and psychosocial support. Reducing visit frequency by increasing ART refills to six months could further benefit patients and unburden health systems. We conducted a pragmatic non-inferiority cluster randomized trial comparing standard of care (SoC) ACs and six-month refill intervention ACs in a primary care facility in Khayelitsha, South Africa.
Existing community-based and facility-based ACs were randomized to either SoC or intervention ACs. SoC ACs met five times annually, receiving two-month refills with a four-month refill over year-end. Blood was drawn at one AC visit with a clinical assessment at the next. Intervention ACs met twice annually receiving six-month refills, with an individual blood collection visit before the annual clinical assessment AC visit. The first study visits were in October and November 2017 and participants followed for 27 months. We report retention in care, viral load completion and viral suppression (<400 copies/mL) 24 months after enrolment and calculated intention-to-treat risk differences for the primary outcomes using generalized estimating equations specifying for clustering by AC.
Of 2150 participants included in the trial, 977 were assigned to the intervention arm (40 ACs) and 1173 to the SoC (48 ACs). Patient characteristics at enrolment were similar across groups. Retention in care at 24 months was similarly high in both arms: 93.6% (1098/1173) in SoC and 92.6% (905/977) in the intervention arm, with a risk difference of -1.0% (95% CI: -3.2 to 1.3). The intervention arm had higher viral load completion (90.8% (999/1173) versus 85.1% (887/977)) and suppression (87.3% (969 /1173) versus 82.6% (853/977)) at 24 months, with a risk difference for completion of 5.5% (95% CI: 1.5 to 9.5) and suppression of 4.6% (95% CI: 0.2 to 9.0).
Intervention AC patients receiving six-month ART refills showed non-inferior retention in care, viral load completion and viral load suppression to those in SoC ACs, adding to a growing literature showing good outcomes with extended ART dispensing intervals.
抗逆转录病毒疗法 (ART) 依从俱乐部 (AC) 模式通过团体 ART 补充和心理社会支持,支持临床稳定的 HIV 患者的保留率。将就诊频率减少到 6 个月,增加 ART 补充剂,将进一步使患者受益,并减轻卫生系统的负担。我们在南非开普敦的一个初级保健机构进行了一项实用的非劣效性集群随机试验,比较了标准护理 (SoC) AC 和 6 个月补充干预 AC。
现有的基于社区和基于设施的 AC 被随机分配到 SoC 或干预 AC。SoC AC 每年聚会五次,接受两个月的补充治疗,在年底再补充四个月。每次 AC 就诊时都要抽取一次血样,并在下一次就诊时进行临床评估。干预 AC 每年聚会两次,接受六个月的补充治疗,在每年的临床评估就诊前进行一次单独的血液采集就诊。第一次研究访问是在 2017 年 10 月和 11 月,参与者随访了 27 个月。我们报告了在招募后 24 个月的护理保留率、病毒载量完成率和病毒抑制率(<400 拷贝/ml),并使用广义估计方程计算了意向治疗的主要结局风险差异,该方程指定了通过 AC 聚类。
在 2150 名参加试验的参与者中,977 名被分配到干预组(40 个 AC),1173 名被分配到 SoC 组(48 个 AC)。两组患者的入组特征相似。在 24 个月时,两组的护理保留率均很高:SoC 组为 93.6%(1098/1173),干预组为 92.6%(905/977),风险差异为-1.0%(95%CI:-3.2 至 1.3)。干预组在 24 个月时的病毒载量完成率(90.8%(999/1173)比 85.1%(887/977))和抑制率(87.3%(969/1173)比 82.6%(853/977))更高,完成率的风险差异为 5.5%(95%CI:1.5 至 9.5),抑制率的风险差异为 4.6%(95%CI:0.2 至 9.0)。
接受 6 个月 ART 补充剂的干预 AC 患者在护理保留率、病毒载量完成率和病毒载量抑制率方面与 SoC AC 患者相似,这增加了越来越多的文献表明,延长 ART 配药间隔可取得良好的效果。