The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY.
Mount Sinai Clinical Intelligence Center (MSCIC)Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e021916. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021916. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Background Despite advances in cardiovascular disease and risk factor management, mortality from ischemic heart failure (HF) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains high. Given the partial role of genetics in HF and lack of reliable risk stratification tools, we developed and validated a polygenic risk score for HF in patients with CAD, which we term HF-PRS. Methods and Results Using summary statistics from a recent genome-wide association study for HF, we developed candidate PRSs in the Mount Sinai Bio CAD patient cohort (N=6274) by using the pruning and thresholding method and LDPred. We validated the best score in the Penn Medicine BioBank (N=7250) and performed a subgroup analysis in a high-risk cohort who had undergone coronary catheterization. We observed a significant association between HF-PRS score and ischemic HF even after adjusting for evidence of obstructive CAD in patients of European ancestry in both Bio (odds ratio [OR], 1.14 per SD; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24; =0.003) and Penn Medicine BioBank (OR, 1.07 per SD; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13; =0.016). In European patients with CAD in Penn Medicine BioBank who had undergone coronary catheterization, individuals in the top 10th percentile of PRS had a 2-fold increased odds of ischemic HF (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7; =0.02) compared with the bottom 10th percentile. Conclusions A PRS for HF enables risk stratification in patients with CAD. Future prospective studies aimed at demonstrating clinical utility are warranted for adoption in the patient setting.
背景 尽管在心血管疾病和危险因素管理方面取得了进展,但冠心病患者的缺血性心力衰竭(HF)死亡率仍然很高。鉴于遗传因素在 HF 中的部分作用以及缺乏可靠的风险分层工具,我们开发并验证了一种用于 CAD 患者 HF 的多基因风险评分(HF-PRS)。
方法和结果 利用最近一项 HF 全基因组关联研究的汇总统计数据,我们通过使用修剪和阈值方法和 LDPred 在 Mount Sinai Bio CAD 患者队列(N=6274)中开发候选 PRS。我们在 Penn Medicine BioBank(N=7250)中验证了最佳评分,并在接受冠状动脉造影的高危队列中进行了亚组分析。我们观察到 HF-PRS 评分与缺血性 HF 之间存在显著关联,即使在调整了欧洲裔患者阻塞性 CAD 证据后也是如此。在 Penn Medicine BioBank 的具有 CAD 的欧洲裔患者中,HF-PRS 评分每增加 1 个标准差,HF 的优势比(OR)分别为 1.14(95%CI,1.05-1.24;=0.003)和 1.07(95%CI,1.01-1.13;=0.016)。在 Penn Medicine BioBank 中接受冠状动脉造影的具有 CAD 的欧洲患者中,PRS 位于前 10%的个体发生缺血性 HF 的几率是 PRS 位于后 10%的个体的 2 倍(OR,2.0;95%CI,1.1-3.7;=0.02)。
结论 HF 的 PRS 可实现 CAD 患者的风险分层。需要进行未来的前瞻性研究以证明其在患者中的临床实用性。