Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
BMJ. 2019 Feb 13;364:l223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l223.
To report reliable estimates of short term and long term survival rates for people with a diagnosis of heart failure and to assess trends over time by year of diagnosis, hospital admission, and socioeconomic group.
Population based cohort study.
Primary care, United Kingdom.
Primary care data for 55 959 patients aged 45 and overwith a new diagnosis of heart failure and 278 679 age and sex matched controls in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2017 and linked to inpatient Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality data.
Survival rates at one, five, and 10 years and cause of death for people with and without heart failure; and temporal trends in survival by year of diagnosis, hospital admission, and socioeconomic group.
Overall, one, five, and 10 year survival rates increased by 6.6% (from 74.2% in 2000 to 80.8% in 2016), 7.2% (from 41.0% in 2000 to 48.2% in 2012), and 6.4% (from 19.8% in 2000 to 26.2% in 2007), respectively. There were 30 906 deaths in the heart failure group over the study period. Heart failure was listed on the death certificate in 13 093 (42.4%) of these patients, and in 2237 (7.2%) it was the primary cause of death. Improvement in survival was greater for patients not requiring admission to hospital around the time of diagnosis (median difference 2.4 years; 5.3 2.9 years, P<0.001). There was a deprivation gap in median survival of 0.5 years between people who were least deprived and those who were most deprived (4.6 v 4.1 years, P<0.001) [corrected].
Survival after a diagnosis of heart failure has shown only modest improvement in the 21st century and lags behind other serious conditions, such as cancer. New strategies to achieve timely diagnosis and treatment initiation in primary care for all socioeconomic groups should be a priority for future research and policy.
报告新诊断为心力衰竭的患者短期和长期生存率的可靠估计,并按诊断年份、住院和社会经济群体评估随时间的趋势。
基于人群的队列研究。
英国初级保健。
2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间,临床实践研究数据链接中有 55959 名年龄在 45 岁及以上的新诊断为心力衰竭的患者和 278679 名年龄和性别匹配的对照患者的初级保健数据,并与住院患者的医院发病统计数据和国家统计局的死亡率数据相关联。
心力衰竭患者和无心力衰竭患者的一年、五年和十年生存率和死亡原因;以及按诊断年份、住院和社会经济群体划分的生存率随时间的变化趋势。
总体而言,1 年、5 年和 10 年的生存率分别提高了 6.6%(从 2000 年的 74.2%提高到 2016 年的 80.8%)、7.2%(从 2000 年的 41.0%提高到 2012 年的 48.2%)和 6.4%(从 2000 年的 19.8%提高到 2007 年的 26.2%)。在研究期间,心力衰竭组有 30906 人死亡。在这些患者中,有 13093 人(42.4%)的死亡证明上列出了心力衰竭,有 2237 人(7.2%)是主要死因。对于那些在诊断时不需要住院治疗的患者,生存率的改善更大(中位数差异为 2.4 年;5.3 2.9 年,P<0.001)。在最贫困和最贫困人群之间,中位生存时间存在 0.5 年的贫困差距(4.6 比 4.1 年,P<0.001)[纠正]。
在 21 世纪,心力衰竭诊断后的生存率仅略有改善,落后于其他严重疾病,如癌症。为所有社会经济群体在初级保健中实现及时诊断和治疗启动的新策略应成为未来研究和政策的重点。