Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium -
Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;74(2):137-145. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04623-1. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Retzius-sparing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RS-RARP) is a novel surgical approach to radical prostatectomy. Its pioneers have suggested an improved recovery of urinary continence, while maintaining adequate cancer control. The aim of this systematic review was to explore available data on RS-RALP and compare functional, oncologic, and perioperative results of RS-RARP compared to anterior RARP.
A search following PRISMA guidelines was performed including the combination of the following words: "Retzius" AND "sparing" AND "radical" AND "prostatectomy." Ninety-three articles were identified and 13 were included in the systematic review, including 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 4 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies.
All available randomized trials confirmed an improved immediate continence for RS-RARP, with rates ranging 51-71%, compared to 21-48% for anterior RARP. However, this advantage was progressively lost with no significant difference found after 6 months. Moreover, a prospective study found no discrepancy in terms of quality of life across the two techniques. Erectile function was difficult to compare, as patients had different baseline erectile function across studies and rate of neurovascular preservation was not comparable. Surgical approach remains controversial regarding positive margin rate, although related to the surgeon's experience and clinical stage. Biochemical recurrence-free survival appears similar between the two approaches.
RS-RARP improves early urinary continence recovery compared to anterior RARP, with this advantage being lost after 3 to 6 months. Erectile function and quality of life were however comparable between the two techniques. The results concerning the rate of positive margins remained controversial. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to better assess oncologic outcomes.
保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RS-RARP)是一种新的根治性前列腺切除术方法。其先驱者提出,这种手术方法可以改善尿控的恢复,同时保持足够的癌症控制效果。本系统评价的目的是探讨 RS-RALP 的现有数据,并比较 RS-RARP 与前入路 RARP 的功能、肿瘤学和围手术期结果。
按照 PRISMA 指南进行了搜索,包括以下单词的组合:“Retzius”和“sparing”和“radical”和“prostatectomy”。共确定了 93 篇文章,其中 13 篇被纳入系统评价,包括 3 项随机对照试验(RCT)、4 项前瞻性研究和 6 项回顾性研究。
所有可用的随机试验都证实 RS-RARP 即刻控尿效果更好,即时控尿率为 51-71%,而前入路 RARP 为 21-48%。然而,这种优势随着时间的推移逐渐丧失,6 个月后没有发现显著差异。此外,一项前瞻性研究发现两种技术在生活质量方面没有差异。由于研究中患者的基线勃起功能不同,且神经血管保留率不可比,因此勃起功能难以比较。关于阳性切缘率,手术方法仍存在争议,尽管这与外科医生的经验和临床分期有关。生化无复发生存率在两种方法之间似乎相似。
与前入路 RARP 相比,RS-RARP 可改善早期尿控恢复,3 至 6 个月后这种优势丧失。然而,两种技术的勃起功能和生活质量相当。阳性切缘率的结果仍存在争议。需要进行随访时间更长的未来研究,以更好地评估肿瘤学结果。