• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人技术对前列腺癌患者根治性治疗选择的影响。

Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients' Choice for Radical Treatment.

作者信息

Esperto Francesco, Cacciatore Loris, Tedesco Francesco, Testa Antonio, Callè Pasquale, Ragusa Alberto, Deanesi Noemi, Minore Antonio, Prata Francesco, Brassetti Aldo, Papalia Rocco, Scarpa Roberto Mario

机构信息

Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy.

Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 May 5;13(5):794. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050794.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13050794
PMID:37240964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10220733/
Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) surgery has a strong impact on men's social and sexual lives. For this reason, many patients ask for robotic surgery. To assess the rate of lost patients due to the lack of a robotic platform (RPl) at our center, we retrospectively selected 577 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2020 and 2021 who were eligible for radical prostatectomy (RP) (ISUP ≥ 2; age ≤ 70 yr). Patients eligible for surgery who decided to be operated received a phone call interview asking the reason for their choice. Overall, 230 patients (31.7%) underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LaRP) at our center, while 494 patients (68.3%) were not treated in our hospital. Finally, 347 patients were included: 87 patients (25.1%) underwent radiotherapy; 59 patients (17%) were already under another urologist's care; 113 patients (32.5%) underwent robotic surgery elsewhere; and 88 patients (25.4%) followed the suggestion of friends or relatives based on their surgical experience. Despite no surgical technique for RP having shown superiority in terms of oncological or functional outcomes, patients eligible for PCa treatment decided to be operated on elsewhere because of the lack of an RPl. Our results show how the presence of an RPl may increase the case volume of RP by 49% at our center.

摘要

前列腺癌(PCa)手术对男性的社交和性生活有重大影响。因此,许多患者要求进行机器人手术。为了评估由于我们中心缺乏机器人平台(RP1)而导致的患者流失率,我们回顾性选择了2020年至2021年间接受前列腺活检且符合根治性前列腺切除术(RP)条件的577例患者(国际泌尿病理学会[ISUP]≥2;年龄≤70岁)。决定接受手术的符合手术条件的患者接受了电话访谈,询问他们选择的原因。总体而言,230例患者(31.7%)在我们中心接受了腹腔镜辅助根治性前列腺切除术(LaRP),而494例患者(68.3%)未在我们医院接受治疗。最后,纳入了347例患者:87例患者(25.1%)接受了放疗;59例患者(17%)已在另一位泌尿科医生的治疗下;113例患者(32.5%)在其他地方接受了机器人手术;88例患者(25.4%)根据朋友或亲属的手术经验听从了他们的建议。尽管没有一种RP手术技术在肿瘤学或功能结果方面显示出优越性,但符合PCa治疗条件的患者因缺乏RP1而决定在其他地方接受手术。我们的结果表明,RP1的存在可能会使我们中心的RP病例量增加49%。

相似文献

1
Impact of Robotic Technologies on Prostate Cancer Patients' Choice for Radical Treatment.机器人技术对前列腺癌患者根治性治疗选择的影响。
J Pers Med. 2023 May 5;13(5):794. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050794.
2
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
3
A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.一项多国、多机构的研究比较了 22393 例开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的阳性切缘率。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
4
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: 12-month Outcomes of the Multicentre Randomised Controlled LAP-01 Trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:多中心随机对照LAP-01试验的12个月结果
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.基于社区的开放式与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.027. Epub 2017 May 9.
6
Comparison of extraperitoneal laparoscopic and extraperitoneal Senhance radical prostatectomy.腹膜外腹腔镜与腹膜外 Senhance 根治性前列腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Feb;18(1):e2344. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2344. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
May Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Performed After an Initial Surveillance Strategy Differ from Those from Immediate Surgery? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on 362 Patients Undergoing Surgery at a Referral Center.初始监测策略后行机器人根治性前列腺切除术的结果是否与即刻手术不同?一家转诊中心对 362 例行手术患者进行倾向评分匹配分析的结果
J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1302-1308. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0812.
8
Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.接受机器人辅助腹腔镜或开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的患者的术前期望。
J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):894-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.135. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
10
Impact of a robotic surgical system on treatment choice for men with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer.机器人手术系统对临床局限性前列腺癌患者治疗选择的影响。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;23(2):347-352. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1203-1. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The predictive utility of the E-PASS score for postoperative complications in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.E-PASS评分对机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后并发症的预测效用:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01899-0.
2
Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Elderly Patients.老年患者单孔与多孔机器人根治性前列腺切除术
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 31;17(11):1857. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111857.
3
Correlation between oxygen reserve index monitoring and blood gas oxygen values during anesthesia in robotic total prostatectomy surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Versius Robotic Surgical System: First Description of a Clinical Case.使用Versius机器人手术系统进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:首例临床病例描述
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Jan 2;48:82-83. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.019. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Retzius-sparing vs. standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer: a comparative study.保留Retzius 间隙与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Sep;26(3):568-574. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00625-3. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Medico-economic impact of onco-urological robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery in a high-volume centre.
机器人辅助全前列腺切除术麻醉期间氧储备指数监测与血气氧值的相关性
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02877-z.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short-term efficacy of the KangDuo surgical robot with the da Vinci robotic system in radical prostatectomy.一项比较康多手术机器人与达芬奇机器人系统在前列腺癌根治术中短期疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 12;19(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02188-y.
5
Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer.术前多学科团队会议可提高病理 T2 期前列腺癌中阳性切缘的发生率。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 9;42(1):571. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1.
6
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy by Lateral Approach: Technique, Reproducibility and Outcomes.经侧方入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:技术、可重复性及结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 16;15(22):5442. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225442.
7
Robotic Medtronic Hugo™ RAS System Is Now Reality: Introduction to a New Simulation Platform for Training Residents.机器人美敦力 Hugo™ RAS 系统现已成为现实:一种新的住院医师培训模拟平台介绍。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;23(17):7348. doi: 10.3390/s23177348.
8
Robotic Surgery in Urology: History from PROBOT to HUGO.机器人外科学在泌尿科的应用:从 PROBOT 到 HUGO 的历史。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;23(16):7104. doi: 10.3390/s23167104.
高容量中心的肿瘤泌尿机器人辅助微创手术的医学经济学影响。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Dec;18(6):e2462. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2462. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with the novel HUGO™ RAS System: feasibility, setting, and perioperative outcomes.使用新型HUGO™机器人辅助手术系统进行单纯前列腺切除术:可行性、手术环境及围手术期结果
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023 Apr;75(2):235-239. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.05031-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
5
Survivorship in prostate cancer following robotic assisted radical prostatectomy-the time to act is now!机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌的生存情况——现在是行动的时候了!
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):46-47. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00589-4. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
The new surgical robotic platform HUGO RAS: System description and docking settings for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.新型手术机器人平台HUGO RAS:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的系统描述与对接设置
Urologia. 2022 Nov;89(4):603-609. doi: 10.1177/03915603221107855. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
7
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy feasibility and setting with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system.使用Hugo™机器人辅助手术系统进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的可行性及设置
BJU Int. 2022 Nov;130(5):671-675. doi: 10.1111/bju.15819. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
8
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Novel Hugo Robotic System: Initial Experience and Optimal Surgical Set-up at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与新型 Hugo 机器人系统:在一家三级转诊机器人中心的初步经验和最佳手术设置。
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):233-237. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.029. Epub 2022 May 12.
9
Future Platforms of Robotic Surgery.机器人手术的未来平台。
Urol Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;49(1):23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
10
Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?保留耻骨后间隙与保留耻骨前间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:该方法真的有区别吗?
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;74(2):137-145. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04623-1. Epub 2021 Oct 29.