• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论沟通策略作为非药物干预措施在应对传染病中的有效性。

On the effectiveness of communication strategies as non-pharmaceutical interventions to tackle epidemics.

机构信息

Computational Biology Lab (DLab), Fundación Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile.

Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaíso, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0257995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257995. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0257995
PMID:34714848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8555801/
Abstract

When pharmaceutical interventions are unavailable to deal with an epidemic outbreak, adequate management of communication strategies can be key to reduce the contagion risks. On the one hand, accessibility to trustworthy and timely information, whilst on the other, the adoption of preventive behaviors may be both crucial. However, despite the abundance of communication strategies, their effectiveness has been scarcely evaluated or merely circumscribed to the scrutiny of public affairs. To study the influence of communication strategies on the spreading dynamics of an infectious disease, we implemented a susceptible-exposed-infected-removed-dead (SEIRD) epidemiological model, using an agent-based approach. Agents in our systems can obtain information modulating their behavior from two sources: (i) through the local interaction with other neighboring agents and, (ii) from a central entity delivering information with a certain periodicity. In doing so, we highlight how global information delivered from a central entity can reduce the impact of an infectious disease and how informing even a small fraction of the population has a remarkable impact, when compared to not informing the population at all. Moreover, having a scheme of delivering daily messages makes a stark difference on the reduction of cases, compared to the other evaluated strategies, denoting that daily delivery of information produces the largest decrease in the number of cases. Furthermore, when the information spreading relies only on local interactions between agents, and no central entity takes actions along the dynamics, then the epidemic spreading is virtually independent of the initial amount of informed agents. On top of that, we found that local communication plays an important role in an intermediate regime where information coming from a central entity is scarce. As a whole, our results highlight the importance of proper communication strategies, both accurate and daily, to tackle epidemic outbreaks.

摘要

当无法通过药物干预来应对疫情爆发时,充分管理传播策略可能是降低传染风险的关键。一方面,获取可靠和及时的信息至关重要,另一方面,采取预防措施也同样重要。然而,尽管存在大量的传播策略,但它们的有效性很少得到评估,或者仅仅局限于公共事务的审查。为了研究传播策略对传染病传播动态的影响,我们采用基于代理的方法实现了一个易感-暴露-感染-移除-死亡(SEIRD)的流行病学模型。我们的系统中的代理可以从两个来源获取信息,从而调整其行为:(i)通过与其他邻近代理的本地交互,以及(ii)通过定期向代理发送信息的中央实体。通过这种方式,我们强调了中央实体提供的全局信息如何能够减少传染病的影响,以及即使只向一小部分人群提供信息,与不向人群提供信息相比,也会产生显著的影响。此外,与其他评估策略相比,每天发送消息的方案在减少病例方面产生了显著的差异,这表明每天发送信息会产生最大程度的病例减少。此外,当信息传播仅依赖于代理之间的本地交互,且没有中央实体在动态中采取行动时,那么传染病的传播实际上与初始数量的知情代理无关。最重要的是,我们发现,在中央实体信息稀缺的中间阶段,本地交流起着重要作用。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了正确的传播策略的重要性,无论是准确的还是日常的,都有助于应对疫情爆发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/c03606b7c851/pone.0257995.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/a1ff9003fc94/pone.0257995.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/f65f86ed51b1/pone.0257995.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/acdf5467df50/pone.0257995.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/c03606b7c851/pone.0257995.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/a1ff9003fc94/pone.0257995.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/f65f86ed51b1/pone.0257995.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/acdf5467df50/pone.0257995.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a67/8555801/c03606b7c851/pone.0257995.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
On the effectiveness of communication strategies as non-pharmaceutical interventions to tackle epidemics.论沟通策略作为非药物干预措施在应对传染病中的有效性。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0257995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257995. eCollection 2021.
2
Optimal control analysis of Ebola disease with control strategies of quarantine and vaccination.埃博拉病的最优控制分析及检疫和疫苗接种控制策略。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Jul 13;5(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0161-6.
3
Selected aspects of filoviruses in the view of Ebola virus disease epidemic.从埃博拉病毒病疫情角度看丝状病毒的某些方面
Przegl Epidemiol. 2015;69(1):15-21, 125-30.
4
Evaluating Subcriticality during the Ebola Epidemic in West Africa.评估西非埃博拉疫情期间的次临界状态。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 20;10(10):e0140651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140651. eCollection 2015.
5
Vaccination strategies to control Ebola epidemics in the context of variable household inaccessibility levels.在家庭可达性水平不同的情况下控制埃博拉疫情的疫苗接种策略。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Nov 21;13(11):e0007814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007814. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
The Ebola outbreak, 2013-2016: old lessons for new epidemics.2013 - 2016年埃博拉疫情:新疫情的旧教训
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 May 26;372(1721). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0297.
7
Sending the Right Message: Wild Game and the West Africa Ebola Outbreak.传递正确信息:野味与西非埃博拉疫情爆发。
Health Secur. 2018 Jan/Feb;16(1):48-57. doi: 10.1089/hs.2017.0086.
8
Spatial and temporal dynamics of superspreading events in the 2014-2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic.2014 - 2015年西非埃博拉疫情中超传播事件的时空动态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 28;114(9):2337-2342. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614595114. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
9
Key data for outbreak evaluation: building on the Ebola experience.疫情评估的关键数据:借鉴埃博拉疫情的经验
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 May 26;372(1721). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0371.
10
Transmission, Human Population, and Pathogenicity: the Ebola Case in Point.传播、人口和致病性:以埃博拉病例为例。
Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Mar;6(2). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MTBP-0003-2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the spread of fake news on Twitter.在 Twitter 上模拟假新闻的传播。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250419. eCollection 2021.
2
Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in post-mortem swab 35 days after death: A case report.死亡后 35 天尸检拭子中持续存在 SARS-CoV-2 RNA:一例报告。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Feb;319:110653. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110653. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
美国新冠疫情大流行第一周期间风险认知及自我报告的防护行为变化
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200742. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed.对新冠疫情的预测失败了。
Int J Forecast. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):423-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Inside out and outside in: How the COVID-19 pandemic affects self-disclosure on social media.由内而外与由外而内:新冠疫情如何影响社交媒体上的自我表露。
Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Dec;55:102188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102188. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
6
Behavioral immune system linked to responses to the threat of COVID-19.行为免疫系统与对新冠病毒威胁的反应有关。
Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Dec 1;167:110221. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110221. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
Community engagement in outbreak response: lessons from the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone.社区参与疫情应对:2014-2016 年塞拉利昂埃博拉疫情的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002145.
8
Review: The safe handling of a corpse (suspected) with COVID-19.综述:新型冠状病毒肺炎疑似尸体的安全处理
J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Jul;73:101999. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101999. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
9
Postmortem Swabs in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pandemic: Report on 12 Complete Clinical Autopsy Cases.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间的尸检拭子:12 例完整临床尸检病例报告。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;144(11):1298-1302. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0362-SA.
10
Wrong but Useful - What Covid-19 Epidemiologic Models Can and Cannot Tell Us.错误但有用——新冠疫情流行病学模型能告诉我们什么及不能告诉我们什么
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 23;383(4):303-305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2016822. Epub 2020 May 15.