Department of Neurology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jan;31(1):106143. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106143. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has the highest morbidity and mortality rate of any stroke subtype and clinicians often administer prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) as a means of preventing post-stroke seizures, particularly following lobar ICH. However, evidence for ASM efficacy in preventing seizures and reducing disability is lacking given limited randomized trials. Herein, we report analysis from a large prospective observational study that evaluates the effect of primary prophylactic ASM administration on seizure occurrence and disability following ICH.
Primary analysis was performed on 1630 patients with ICH enrolled in the ERICH study. A propensity score for administration of prophylactic ASM was developed and patients were matched by the closest propensity score (difference < 0.1). McNemar's test was used to compare occurrence of in-hospital seizure and disability, defined by modified Rankin Score (mRS) ≥ 3 at 3 months post ICH.
Of the 815 matched pairs of patients treated with primary prophylactic ASM, there was no significant difference in seizure occurrence (p = 0.4631) or disability (p = 0.4653). Subset analysis of 280 matched pairs of patients with primary lobar ICH similarly revealed no significant difference in seizure occurrence (p = 0.1011) or disability (p = 1.00) between prophylactically treated and untreated patients.
Although current guidelines do not recommend primary prophylactic ASM following ICH, clinical use remains widespread. Data from the ERICH study did not find an association between administering primary prophylactic ASM and preventing seizures or reducing disability following ICH, thus providing evidence to influence clinical practice and patient care.
脑出血 (ICH) 是所有脑卒中亚型中发病率和死亡率最高的,临床医生通常会预防性使用抗癫痫药物 (ASM) 来预防脑卒中后癫痫,尤其是在大脑半球 ICH 后。然而,鉴于随机试验有限,ASM 预防癫痫和减少残疾的疗效证据不足。在此,我们报告了一项大型前瞻性观察研究的分析结果,该研究评估了原发性预防性 ASM 给药对 ICH 后癫痫发作和残疾的影响。
对 ERICH 研究中纳入的 1630 名 ICH 患者进行了主要分析。制定了预防性 ASM 给药的倾向评分,并通过最接近的倾向评分 (差异 < 0.1) 进行患者匹配。采用 McNemar 检验比较住院期间癫痫发作和残疾的发生率,残疾定义为 ICH 后 3 个月改良 Rankin 评分 (mRS) ≥ 3。
在接受原发性预防性 ASM 治疗的 815 对患者中,癫痫发作的发生率(p=0.4631)或残疾(p=0.4653)无显著差异。对 280 对原发性大脑半球 ICH 患者的亚组分析同样显示,预防性治疗和未治疗患者之间癫痫发作(p=0.1011)或残疾(p=1.00)的发生率无显著差异。
尽管目前的指南不建议在 ICH 后进行原发性预防性 ASM,但临床应用仍然广泛。来自 ERICH 研究的数据并未发现给予原发性预防性 ASM 与预防 ICH 后癫痫发作或减少残疾之间存在关联,从而为影响临床实践和患者护理提供了证据。