Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Central Finland Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 29;22(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04807-3.
Neck pain has been associated with weaker neck muscle strength and decreased cervical spine range of motion. However, whether neck muscle strength or cervical spine mobility predict later neck disability has not been demonstrated. In this 16-year prospective study, we investigated whether neck muscle strength and cervical spine mobility are associated with future neck pain and related disability in women pain-free at baseline.
Maximal isometric neck muscle strength and passive range of motion (PROM) of the cervical spine of 220 women (mean age 40, standard deviation (SD) 12 years) were measured at baseline between 2000 and 2002. We conducted a postal survey 16 years later to determine whether any subjects had experienced neck pain and related disability. Linear regression analysis adjusted for age and body mass index was used to determine to what extent baseline neck strength and PROM values were associated with future neck pain and related disability assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
The regression analysis Beta coefficient remained below 0.1 for all the neck strength and PROM values, indicating no association between neck pain and related disability. Of the 149 (68%) responders, mean NDI was lowest (3.3, SD 3.8) in participants who had experienced no neck pain (n = 50), second lowest (7.7, SD 7.1) in those who had experienced occasional neck pain (n = 94), and highest (19.6, SD 22.0) in those who had experienced chronic neck pain (n = 5).
This 16-year prospective study found no evidence for an association between either neck muscle strength or mobility and the occurrence in later life of neck pain and disability. Therefore, screening healthy subjects for weaker neck muscle strength or poorer cervical spine mobility cannot be recommended for preventive purposes.
颈部疼痛与颈部肌肉力量较弱和颈椎活动范围减小有关。然而,颈部肌肉力量或颈椎活动度是否能预测未来的颈部疼痛和相关残疾尚未得到证实。在这项为期 16 年的前瞻性研究中,我们调查了在基线时无症状的女性中,颈部肌肉力量和颈椎活动度是否与未来的颈部疼痛和相关残疾有关。
在 2000 年至 2002 年期间,对 220 名女性(平均年龄 40 岁,标准差 12 岁)的最大等长颈部肌肉力量和颈椎被动活动度(PROM)进行了基线测量。16 年后进行了邮寄调查,以确定是否有任何受试者经历过颈部疼痛和相关残疾。使用线性回归分析,调整年龄和体重指数,以确定基线颈部力量和 PROM 值与使用颈痛残疾指数(NDI)评估的未来颈部疼痛和相关残疾有多大程度的关联。
回归分析的 Beta 系数对于所有颈部力量和 PROM 值均低于 0.1,表明颈部疼痛和相关残疾之间没有关联。在 149 名(68%)应答者中,从未经历过颈部疼痛的参与者(n=50)的平均 NDI 最低(3.3,标准差 3.8),偶尔经历过颈部疼痛的参与者(n=94)的平均 NDI 次之(7.7,标准差 7.1),而经常经历过颈部疼痛的参与者(n=5)的平均 NDI 最高(19.6,标准差 22.0)。
这项为期 16 年的前瞻性研究没有发现颈部肌肉力量或活动度与以后发生颈部疼痛和残疾之间存在关联的证据。因此,不能为了预防目的而建议对健康受试者进行颈部肌肉力量较弱或颈椎活动度较差的筛查。