• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院采用基于移动的个人健康记录系统与患者特征:一项利用国家医疗保健大数据进行的分析性横断面研究。

Hospitals' Adoption of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems and Patients' Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing National Healthcare Big Data.

机构信息

Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), Wonju, Korea.

Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231160892. doi: 10.1177/00469580231160892.

DOI:10.1177/00469580231160892
PMID:36927267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10026127/
Abstract

Insufficient information exists on the associations between hospitals' adoption of mobile-based personal health record (mPHR) systems and patients' characteristics. This study explored the associations between patients' characteristics and hospitals' adoption of mPHR systems in Korea. This cross-sectional study used 316 hospitals with 100 or more beds as the unit of analysis. Previously collected data on mPHR adoption from May 1 to June 30, 2020 were analyzed. National health insurance claims data for 2019 were also used to analyze patients' characteristics. The dependent variable was mPHR system adoption (0 vs 1) and the main independent variables were the number of patients, age distribution, and proportions of patients with cancer, diabetes, and hypertension among inpatients and outpatients. The number of inpatients was significantly associated with mPHR adoption (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.174; 1.117-1.233, P < .001), as was the number of outpatients (aOR: 1.041; 1.028-1.054,  < .001). The proportion of inpatients aged 31 to 60 years to those aged 31 years and older was also associated with hospital mPHR adoption (aOR: 1.053; 1.022-1.085,  = .001). mPHR system adoption was significantly associated with the proportion of inpatients (aOR: 1.089; 1.012-1.172,  = .024) and outpatients (aOR: 1.138; 1.026-1.263,  = .015) with cancer and outpatients (aOR: 1.271; 1.101-1.466,  = .001) with hypertension. Although mPHR systems are useful for the management of chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, the number of patients, younger age distribution, and the proportion of cancer patients were closely associated with hospitals' introduction of mPHR systems.

摘要

关于医院采用移动个人健康记录(mPHR)系统与患者特征之间的关联,目前的信息还不够充分。本研究探讨了韩国患者特征与医院采用 mPHR 系统之间的关联。本横断面研究以 100 张或以上病床的 316 家医院为分析单位。分析了 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间收集的 mPHR 采用情况的先前数据。还使用了 2019 年的国家健康保险索赔数据来分析患者特征。因变量为 mPHR 系统采用(0 与 1),主要自变量为住院患者和门诊患者的患者人数、年龄分布以及癌症、糖尿病和高血压患者的比例。住院患者人数与 mPHR 采用显著相关(调整后的优势比[aOR]:1.174;1.117-1.233,P<.001),门诊患者人数也与 mPHR 采用显著相关(aOR:1.041;1.028-1.054,P<.001)。31 至 60 岁的住院患者比例与 31 岁及以上的住院患者比例也与医院采用 mPHR 相关(aOR:1.053;1.022-1.085,P=.001)。mPHR 系统的采用与癌症住院患者(aOR:1.089;1.012-1.172,P=.024)和门诊患者(aOR:1.138;1.026-1.263,P=.015)以及高血压门诊患者(aOR:1.271;1.101-1.466,P=.001)的比例显著相关。虽然 mPHR 系统对于糖尿病和高血压等慢性病的管理很有用,但患者人数、更年轻的年龄分布以及癌症患者的比例与医院引入 mPHR 系统密切相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2f/10026127/5044240b4a7c/10.1177_00469580231160892-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2f/10026127/5044240b4a7c/10.1177_00469580231160892-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2f/10026127/5044240b4a7c/10.1177_00469580231160892-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospitals' Adoption of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems and Patients' Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing National Healthcare Big Data.医院采用基于移动的个人健康记录系统与患者特征:一项利用国家医疗保健大数据进行的分析性横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231160892. doi: 10.1177/00469580231160892.
2
Factors of quality of care and their association with smartphone based PHR adoption in South Korean hospitals.医疗照护质量因素及其与韩国医院采用基于智能手机的个人健康记录的关联。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01666-9.
3
Factors associated with the download and use of mobile personal health record applications in Korean hospitals.韩国医院中与移动个人健康记录应用程序下载和使用相关的因素。
Health Informatics J. 2023 Jul-Sep;29(3):14604582231196955. doi: 10.1177/14604582231196955.
4
Mobile personal health records: an evaluation of features and functionality.移动个人健康记录:功能和特点评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Sep;81(9):579-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
5
Identifying patterns of non-communicable diseases in developed eastern coastal China: a longitudinal study of electronic health records from 12 public hospitals.识别中国东部沿海发达地区的非传染性疾病模式:一项对12家公立医院电子健康记录的纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e016007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016007.
6
Socioeconomic deprivation, age and language are barriers to accessing personal health records: a cross-sectional study of a large hospital-based personal health record system.社会经济贫困、年龄和语言是获取个人健康记录的障碍:一项基于大型医院的个人健康记录系统的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):e054655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054655.
7
Managing Patient-Generated Health Data Through Mobile Personal Health Records: Analysis of Usage Data.通过移动个人健康记录管理患者生成的健康数据:使用数据的分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 9;6(4):e89. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9620.
8
Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems.基于移动设备的个人健康记录系统的平台与功能分析
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):311-320. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.311. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
9
Hospital adoption of interoperability functions.医院采用互操作性功能。
Healthc (Amst). 2019 Sep;7(3):100347. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Forecasting the Maturation of Electronic Health Record Functions Among US Hospitals: Retrospective Analysis and Predictive Model.预测美国医院电子健康记录功能的成熟度:回顾性分析与预测模型
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 7;20(8):e10458. doi: 10.2196/10458.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Health Record Smart Network Challenges and Trends for a Smarter World.患者健康记录智能网络:迈向更智能世界的挑战与趋势
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;25(12):3710. doi: 10.3390/s25123710.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors of quality of care and their association with smartphone based PHR adoption in South Korean hospitals.医疗照护质量因素及其与韩国医院采用基于智能手机的个人健康记录的关联。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01666-9.
2
Functionalities and Issues in the Implementation of Personal Health Records: Systematic Review.个人健康记录实施中的功能与问题:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 21;23(7):e26236. doi: 10.2196/26236.
3
Boosting Sustainability in Healthcare Sector through Fintech: Analyzing the Moderating Role of Financial and ICT Development.
通过金融科技提高医疗保健部门的可持续性:分析金融和信息通信技术发展的调节作用。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211028174. doi: 10.1177/00469580211028174.
4
Mortality in the United States, 2019.2019 年美国死亡率。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Dec(395):1-8.
5
Analysis of Platforms and Functions of Mobile-Based Personal Health Record Systems.基于移动设备的个人健康记录系统的平台与功能分析
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Oct;26(4):311-320. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.311. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
6
Exploring the use of Mobile applications by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A scoping review.探讨癌症患者在化疗期间使用移动应用程序的情况:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Dec;144:104293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104293. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Variation in Hospice Patient and Admission Characteristics by Referral Location.临终关怀患者的差异以及按转诊地点划分的入院特征
Med Care. 2020 Dec;58(12):1069-1074. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001415.
8
Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review.慢性病患者、医护人员和照护者采用和使用电子个人健康记录的障碍:系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01159-1.
9
Hospitalizations and length of stay of cancer patients: A cohort study in the Brazilian Public Health System.癌症患者的住院和住院时间:巴西公共卫生系统中的一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 20;15(5):e0233293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233293. eCollection 2020.
10
New technologies, new disparities: The intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy.新技术,新差距:电子健康与数字健康素养的交集。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;292:280-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.066. Epub 2019 May 28.