Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), Wonju, Korea.
Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231160892. doi: 10.1177/00469580231160892.
Insufficient information exists on the associations between hospitals' adoption of mobile-based personal health record (mPHR) systems and patients' characteristics. This study explored the associations between patients' characteristics and hospitals' adoption of mPHR systems in Korea. This cross-sectional study used 316 hospitals with 100 or more beds as the unit of analysis. Previously collected data on mPHR adoption from May 1 to June 30, 2020 were analyzed. National health insurance claims data for 2019 were also used to analyze patients' characteristics. The dependent variable was mPHR system adoption (0 vs 1) and the main independent variables were the number of patients, age distribution, and proportions of patients with cancer, diabetes, and hypertension among inpatients and outpatients. The number of inpatients was significantly associated with mPHR adoption (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.174; 1.117-1.233, P < .001), as was the number of outpatients (aOR: 1.041; 1.028-1.054, < .001). The proportion of inpatients aged 31 to 60 years to those aged 31 years and older was also associated with hospital mPHR adoption (aOR: 1.053; 1.022-1.085, = .001). mPHR system adoption was significantly associated with the proportion of inpatients (aOR: 1.089; 1.012-1.172, = .024) and outpatients (aOR: 1.138; 1.026-1.263, = .015) with cancer and outpatients (aOR: 1.271; 1.101-1.466, = .001) with hypertension. Although mPHR systems are useful for the management of chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, the number of patients, younger age distribution, and the proportion of cancer patients were closely associated with hospitals' introduction of mPHR systems.
关于医院采用移动个人健康记录(mPHR)系统与患者特征之间的关联,目前的信息还不够充分。本研究探讨了韩国患者特征与医院采用 mPHR 系统之间的关联。本横断面研究以 100 张或以上病床的 316 家医院为分析单位。分析了 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间收集的 mPHR 采用情况的先前数据。还使用了 2019 年的国家健康保险索赔数据来分析患者特征。因变量为 mPHR 系统采用(0 与 1),主要自变量为住院患者和门诊患者的患者人数、年龄分布以及癌症、糖尿病和高血压患者的比例。住院患者人数与 mPHR 采用显著相关(调整后的优势比[aOR]:1.174;1.117-1.233,P<.001),门诊患者人数也与 mPHR 采用显著相关(aOR:1.041;1.028-1.054,P<.001)。31 至 60 岁的住院患者比例与 31 岁及以上的住院患者比例也与医院采用 mPHR 相关(aOR:1.053;1.022-1.085,P=.001)。mPHR 系统的采用与癌症住院患者(aOR:1.089;1.012-1.172,P=.024)和门诊患者(aOR:1.138;1.026-1.263,P=.015)以及高血压门诊患者(aOR:1.271;1.101-1.466,P=.001)的比例显著相关。虽然 mPHR 系统对于糖尿病和高血压等慢性病的管理很有用,但患者人数、更年轻的年龄分布以及癌症患者的比例与医院引入 mPHR 系统密切相关。