Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona Laboratory for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability (BCNUEJ), Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona Laboratory for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability (BCNUEJ), Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona Laboratory for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability (BCNUEJ), Spain.
Health Place. 2021 Nov;72:102698. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102698. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
As global cities grapple with the increasing challenge of gentrification and displacement, research in public health and urban geography has presented growing evidence about the negative impacts of those unequal urban changes on the health of historically marginalized groups. Yet, to date comprehensive research about the variety of health impacts and their pathways beyond single case sites and through an international comparative approach of different gentrification drivers and manifestations remains scarce. In this paper, we analyze qualitative data on the pathways by which gentrification impacts the health of historically marginalized residents in 14 cities in Europe and North America. We build on 77 interviews with key neighborhood stakeholders. Data analysis indicates four main concurrent processes: Threats to housing and financial security; Socio-cultural displacement; Loss of services and amenities through institutional gentrification; and Increased risks of criminal behavior and compromised public safety. Gentrification is experienced as a chain of physical and emotional community and individual traumas - an overall shock for historically marginalized groups - because of permanent pressures of insecurity, loss, state of displaceability, and the associated exacerbation of socio-environmental disadvantages.
随着全球城市越来越多地面临着内城改造和居民外迁带来的挑战,公共卫生和城市地理学领域的研究已经提供了越来越多的证据,表明这些不平等的城市变化对历史上处于边缘地位的群体的健康造成了负面影响。然而,迄今为止,关于健康影响的多样性及其途径的综合研究仍然很少,这些研究途径超越了单一案例地点,并通过对不同内城改造驱动力和表现形式的国际比较方法进行研究。在本文中,我们分析了关于内城改造如何影响欧洲和北美的 14 个城市中历史上处于边缘地位的居民健康的定性数据。我们的分析基于对 77 名关键社区利益相关者的访谈。数据分析表明存在四个主要的并发过程:住房和经济安全受到威胁;社会文化方面的居民外迁;机构内城改造导致服务和便利设施的丧失;犯罪行为风险增加以及公共安全受到损害。内城改造被视为一系列的身体和情感上的社区和个人创伤,对历史上处于边缘地位的群体来说,这是一种整体的冲击,因为他们长期处于不安全、丧失、可迁移性的状态,以及由此加剧的社会环境劣势。