• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《永恒之战:理解、科幻小说与思想实验》

The Forever War: understanding, science fiction, and thought experiments.

作者信息

Wiltsche Harald A

机构信息

Department for Culture and Communication, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Synthese. 2021;198(4):3675-3698. doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02306-6. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11229-019-02306-6
PMID:34720221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8550122/
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show that scientific thought experiments and works of science fiction are highly suitable tools for facilitating and increasing understanding of science. After comparing one of Einstein's most famous thought experiments with the science fiction novel "The Forever War", I shall argue that both proceed similarly in making some of the more outlandish consequences of special relativity theory intelligible. However, as I will also point out, understanding in thought experiments and understanding in science fiction differ in one important respect: While the former aim at what I shall call "physical understanding", science fiction novels typically have "existential understanding" as their target.

摘要

本文的目的是表明,科学思想实验和科幻作品是促进和加深对科学理解的高度合适的工具。在将爱因斯坦最著名的思想实验之一与科幻小说《永恒的战争》进行比较之后,我将论证,两者在使狭义相对论的一些更离奇的后果变得易懂方面的进展相似。然而,正如我也将指出的,思想实验中的理解和科幻作品中的理解在一个重要方面有所不同:前者旨在达到我所称的“物理理解”,而科幻小说通常以“存在理解”为目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/ae26773ff4ee/11229_2019_2306_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/de75a74c0910/11229_2019_2306_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/99520f65e583/11229_2019_2306_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/1a99caa1f0bf/11229_2019_2306_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/ae26773ff4ee/11229_2019_2306_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/de75a74c0910/11229_2019_2306_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/99520f65e583/11229_2019_2306_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/1a99caa1f0bf/11229_2019_2306_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/8550122/ae26773ff4ee/11229_2019_2306_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Forever War: understanding, science fiction, and thought experiments.《永恒之战:理解、科幻小说与思想实验》
Synthese. 2021;198(4):3675-3698. doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02306-6. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
2
Taming theory with thought experiments: Understanding and scientific progress.用思想实验驾驭理论:理解与科学进步。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Aug;58:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 6.
3
"Becoming Acquainted with All That Pain": Nursing as Activism in Naomi Mitchison's Science Fiction.
Lit Med. 2019;37(2):278-297. doi: 10.1353/lm.2019.0013.
4
Mental Writing and Mental Health and Cultural Identity in Doris Lessing's Science Fiction.多丽丝·莱辛科幻小说中的精神书写与心理健康和文化认同。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Aug 27;2022:2215829. doi: 10.1155/2022/2215829. eCollection 2022.
5
Science fiction authors' perspectives on human genetic engineering.科幻小说作家对人类基因工程的看法。
Med Humanit. 2022 Sep;48(3):285-297. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2020-012041. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
The psychologist, the psychoanalyst and the 'extraordinary child' in postwar British science fiction.战后英国科幻小说中的心理学家、精神分析学家与“非凡儿童”
Med Humanit. 2016 Dec;42(4):e4-e9. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2016-010912.
7
The princess at the conference: Science, pacifism, and Habsburg society.会议上的公主:科学、和平主义与哈布斯堡社会。
Hist Sci. 2021 Dec;59(4):434-460. doi: 10.1177/0073275320977750. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
New ways: the pandemics of science fiction.新途径:科幻小说中的大流行病。
Interface Focus. 2021 Oct 12;11(6):20210027. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0027. eCollection 2021 Dec 6.
9
[The democratic side of science-fiction].[科幻小说的民主一面]
Med Sci (Paris). 2011 Apr;27(4):433-8. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2011274021. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
10
Science fiction and the medical humanities.科幻小说与医学人文学科。
Med Humanit. 2016 Dec;42(4):213-218. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2016-011144.

本文引用的文献

1
Taming theory with thought experiments: Understanding and scientific progress.用思想实验驾驭理论:理解与科学进步。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Aug;58:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 6.
2
The hazards of space travel.太空旅行的危害。
EMBO Rep. 2003 Nov;4(11):1013-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor7400016.
3
Concepts do more than categorize.概念的作用不止于分类。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Mar;3(3):99-105. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01288-7.
4
Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence.数学思维的来源:行为学和脑成像证据
Science. 1999 May 7;284(5416):970-4. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5416.970.