Suppr超能文献

医疗保健、责任与黄金机遇。

Healthcare, Responsibility and Golden Opportunities.

作者信息

De Marco Gabriel, Douglas Thomas, Savulescu Julian

机构信息

Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Jesus College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2021;24(3):817-831. doi: 10.1007/s10677-021-10208-1. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

Abstract

When it comes to determining how healthcare resources should be allocated, there are many factors that could-and perhaps should-be taken into account. One such factor is a patient's responsibility for his or her illness, or for the behavior that caused it. Policies that take responsibility for the unhealthy lifestyle or its outcomes into account-responsibility-sensitive policies-have faced a series of criticisms. One holds that agents often fail to meet either the control or epistemic conditions on responsibility with regard to their unhealthy lifestyles or their outcomes. Another holds that even if patients sometimes are responsible for these items, we cannot know whether a patient is responsible for them. In this article, we propose a type of responsibility-sensitive policy that may be able to surmount these difficulties. Under this type of policy, patients are empowered to change to a healthier lifestyle by being given what we call a 'Golden Opportunity' to change. Such a policy would not only avoid concerns about patients' fulfilment of conditions on responsibility for their lifestyles, it would also allow healthcare authorities to be justified in believing that a patient who does not change her lifestyle is responsible for the unhealthy lifestyle. We conclude with a discussion of avenues for further work, and place this policy in the broader context of the debate on responsibility for health.

摘要

在确定医疗资源应如何分配时,有许多因素可能且或许应该被考虑在内。其中一个因素是患者对其疾病或导致疾病的行为所应承担的责任。考虑到不健康生活方式或其后果的政策——责任敏感型政策——面临着一系列批评。一种观点认为,主体往往在对其不健康生活方式或后果的责任方面,未能满足控制或认知条件。另一种观点认为,即使患者有时对这些事项负有责任,我们也无法知道某个患者是否对此负责。在本文中,我们提出一种可能能够克服这些困难的责任敏感型政策。在这种政策下,患者通过获得我们所称的“黄金机会”来改变,从而有能力转向更健康的生活方式。这样的政策不仅可以避免对患者是否满足对其生活方式的责任条件的担忧,还能让医疗当局有理由相信,不改变生活方式的患者应对不健康生活方式负责。我们最后讨论了进一步工作的途径,并将这项政策置于关于健康责任辩论的更广泛背景中。

相似文献

1
Healthcare, Responsibility and Golden Opportunities.医疗保健、责任与黄金机遇。
Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2021;24(3):817-831. doi: 10.1007/s10677-021-10208-1. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Responsibility amid the social determinants of health.健康社会决定因素中的责任。
Bioethics. 2021 Jan;35(1):6-14. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12782. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
Evidence, alarm, and the debate over e-cigarettes.证据、警示与电子烟之争。
Science. 2019 Dec 13;366(6471):1318-1320. doi: 10.1126/science.aba0032.
4
Response to Commentaries on 'Responsibility in Healthcare Across Time and Agents'.
J Med Ethics. 2019 Oct;45(10):652-653. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105804. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
6
Solidarity and Responsibility in Health Care.医疗保健中的团结与责任。
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Jul 4;12(2):133-144. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz008. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
Taking Responsibility for Responsibility.对责任负责。
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Feb 11;12(2):103-113. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz001. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
Responsibility in healthcare across time and agents.医疗保健中的责任:时间和代理人的视角
J Med Ethics. 2019 Oct;45(10):636-644. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105382. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10
Responsibility, prudence and health promotion.责任、谨慎和促进健康。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Sep 30;41(3):561-565. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy113.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验