• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于预期意向的生活方式合同:移动医疗技术与医疗保健中的责任。

Prospective Intention-Based Lifestyle Contracts: mHealth Technology and Responsibility in Healthcare.

机构信息

Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2021 Sep;29(3):189-212. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00424-8. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-020-00424-8
PMID:33428016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8321967/
Abstract

As the rising costs of lifestyle-related diseases place increasing strain on public healthcare systems, the individual's role in disease may be proposed as a healthcare rationing criterion. Literature thus far has largely focused on retrospective responsibility in healthcare. The concept of prospective responsibility, in the form of a lifestyle contract, warrants further investigation. The responsibilisation in healthcare debate also needs to take into account innovative developments in mobile health technology, such as wearable biometric devices and mobile apps, which may change how we hold others accountable for their lifestyles. Little is known about public attitudes towards lifestyle contracts and the use of mobile health technology to hold people responsible in the context of healthcare. This paper has two components. Firstly, it details empirical findings from a survey of 81 members of the United Kingdom general public on public attitudes towards individual responsibility and rationing healthcare, prospective and retrospective responsibility, and the acceptability of lifestyle contracts in the context of mobile health technology. Secondly, we draw on the empirical findings and propose a model of prospective intention-based lifestyle contracts, which is both more aligned with public intuitions and less ethically objectionable than more traditional, retrospective models of responsibility in healthcare.

摘要

随着与生活方式相关的疾病导致的医疗成本不断上升,对公共医疗体系造成了越来越大的压力,个人在疾病中的作用可能被提议作为医疗资源配给的标准。迄今为止,文献主要集中在医疗保健中的回顾性责任上。以生活方式合同形式出现的前瞻性责任这一概念值得进一步研究。医疗保健责任争论也需要考虑移动健康技术的创新发展,例如可穿戴生物识别设备和移动应用程序,这些创新可能会改变我们追究他人生活方式责任的方式。对于公众对生活方式合同的态度以及在医疗保健背景下使用移动健康技术来追究人们责任的态度,我们知之甚少。本文有两个部分。首先,它详细介绍了对英国 81 名普通公众进行的一项调查的实证发现,该调查涉及公众对个人责任和医疗资源配给、前瞻性和回溯性责任的看法,以及在移动健康技术背景下生活方式合同的可接受性。其次,我们借鉴实证发现,提出了一种基于前瞻性意图的生活方式合同模型,该模型与公众的直觉更为一致,并且比医疗保健中更传统的回溯性责任模型在伦理上更不易受到反对。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d39/8321967/1a500ba9ff9b/10728_2020_424_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d39/8321967/1a500ba9ff9b/10728_2020_424_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d39/8321967/1a500ba9ff9b/10728_2020_424_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective Intention-Based Lifestyle Contracts: mHealth Technology and Responsibility in Healthcare.基于预期意向的生活方式合同:移动医疗技术与医疗保健中的责任。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Sep;29(3):189-212. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00424-8. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
2
Applying an Extended UTAUT2 Model to Explain User Acceptance of Lifestyle and Therapy Mobile Health Apps: Survey Study.应用扩展的 UTAUT2 模型解释生活方式和治疗移动健康应用的用户接受度:调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 18;10(1):e27095. doi: 10.2196/27095.
3
Assessment of the Intention to Use Mobile Health Applications Using a Technology Acceptance Model in an Israeli Adult Population.在以色列成年人群体中使用技术接受模型评估使用移动健康应用程序的意愿
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Sep;26(9):1141-1149. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0144. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
4
Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.卫生工作者对使用移动健康技术提供初级卫生保健服务的看法和体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 26;3(3):CD011942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011942.pub2.
5
Perceptions of healthcare professionals and patients with cardiovascular diseases on mHealth lifestyle apps: A qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员和心血管疾病患者对移动健康生活方式应用程序的认知:一项定性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Feb;194:105706. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105706. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
6
Comparison of Mobile Health Technology Use for Self-Tracking Between Older Adults and the General Adult Population in Canada: Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大老年人与普通成年人群体使用移动健康技术进行自我追踪的比较:横断面调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 27;8(11):e24718. doi: 10.2196/24718.
7
The Mediating Influence of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology on the Relationship Between Internal Health Locus of Control and Mobile Health Adoption: Cross-sectional Study.统一科技接受与使用理论在内部控制健康源与移动医疗采纳关系中的中介作用:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 29;23(12):e28086. doi: 10.2196/28086.
8
mHealth Apps: Disruptive Innovation, Regulation, and Trust-A Need for Balance.移动医疗应用程序:颠覆性创新、监管和信任——需要平衡。
Med Law Rev. 2020 Aug 1;28(3):549-572. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa019.
9
The Usability and Effectiveness of Mobile Health Technology-Based Lifestyle and Medical Intervention Apps Supporting Health Care During Pregnancy: Systematic Review.基于移动健康技术的生活方式和医疗干预应用程序在孕期支持医疗保健中的可用性和有效性:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 24;6(4):e109. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8834.
10
Understanding Use Intention of mHealth Applications Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT-2) Model in China.基于统一科技接受与使用理论 2 (UTAUT-2)模型理解中国移动医疗应用的使用意图。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043139.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Individual Responsibilisation: How Social Relations are Mobilised in Communication About a Dementia Self-Testing App.超越个人责任化:痴呆自我检测应用程序传播中社会关系的动员方式
Health Care Anal. 2024 Dec 27. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00498-8.
2
Personal responsibility for health in Bulgarian public health law and social legislation.保加利亚公共卫生法和社会立法中的个人健康责任。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 5;24(1):1189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11624-6.
3
Scoping Review Shows the Dynamics and Complexities Inherent to the Notion of "Responsibility" in Artificial Intelligence within the Healthcare Context.

本文引用的文献

1
Developments in Privacy and Data Ownership in Mobile Health Technologies, 2016-2019.移动医疗技术中隐私和数据所有权的发展,2016-2019。
Yearb Med Inform. 2020 Aug;29(1):32-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701987. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
2
Solidarity and Responsibility in Health Care.医疗保健中的团结与责任。
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Jul 4;12(2):133-144. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz008. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Social determinants and non-communicable diseases: time for integrated action.社会决定因素与非传染性疾病:采取综合行动的时刻到了。
范围审查揭示了医疗保健背景下人工智能中“责任”概念所固有的动态性和复杂性。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun 11;16(3):315-344. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00292-7. eCollection 2024 Jul.
BMJ. 2019 Jan 28;364:l251. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l251.
4
Rationing elective surgery for smokers and obese patients: responsibility or prognosis?对吸烟者和肥胖患者的择期手术进行配给:是责任还是预后?
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0272-7.
5
Investing in non-communicable diseases: an estimation of the return on investment for prevention and treatment services.投资于非传染性疾病:预防和治疗服务投资回报的估计。
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):2071-2078. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30665-2. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
6
Benefit in liver transplantation: a survey among medical staff, patients, medical students and non-medical university staff and students.肝移植的益处:对医务人员、患者、医学生以及非医学专业的大学教职工和学生的一项调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 12;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0248-7.
7
Digital healthcare: regulating the revolution.数字医疗:规范变革
BMJ. 2018 Jan 15;360:k6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k6.
8
Golden opportunity, reasonable risk and personal responsibility for health.黄金机遇、合理风险与个人健康责任。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):59-61. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104428. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review.公共卫生干预措施的投资回报:系统评价。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):827-834. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208141. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
10
Privacy and Security Issues Surrounding the Protection of Data Generated by Continuous Glucose Monitors.围绕持续葡萄糖监测仪所产生数据保护的隐私与安全问题。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;11(2):216-219. doi: 10.1177/1932296816681585. Epub 2017 Feb 13.