Ruhle Sascha Alexander, Schmoll René
Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:734106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734106. eCollection 2021.
This study explored (virtual) sickness presenteeism in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using qualitative data from 505 members of the German working population, it investigates how working from home, which rapidly increased because of the COVID-19 outbreak, is perceived with regard to the pandemic. The study explored how this development affects the decision to show absence or presence in case of illness. More than 1,300 responses to different open-end questions by presenteeists and non-presenteeists were analyzed. The findings suggest that many previously identified reasons for deciding for or against presenteeism are still applicable. However, noteworthy differences with regard to both telecommuting and the pandemic occurred. Virtual sickness presenteeism seems to be strongly encouraged by the possibility to adjust working conditions at home. Additionally, COVID-19 has affected the perceptions of health at work. The study contributes to a more in-depth understanding of (virtual) sickness presenteeism during a global pandemic. Six propositions for future research are developed, and the importance of context for the consequences of virtual sickness presenteeism is discussed.
本研究探讨了新冠疫情背景下的(虚拟)带病出勤现象。利用来自505名德国在职人员的定性数据,调查了因新冠疫情爆发而迅速增加的居家办公在疫情方面是如何被看待的。该研究探讨了这一发展如何影响患病时缺勤或出勤的决定。对带病出勤者和非带病出勤者针对不同开放式问题的1300多条回复进行了分析。研究结果表明,许多先前确定的支持或反对带病出勤的理由仍然适用。然而,在远程办公和疫情方面出现了值得注意的差异。在家调整工作条件的可能性似乎强烈助长了虚拟带病出勤现象。此外,新冠疫情影响了对工作场所健康的认知。该研究有助于更深入地理解全球疫情期间的(虚拟)带病出勤现象。提出了六个未来研究的命题,并讨论了背景对于虚拟带病出勤后果的重要性。