• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于全血细胞计数的COVID-19检测机器学习模型的外部验证

External validation of Machine Learning models for COVID-19 detection based on Complete Blood Count.

作者信息

Campagner Andrea, Carobene Anna, Cabitza Federico

机构信息

DISCo, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Laboratory Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Oct 23;9(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00167-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1007/s13755-021-00167-3
PMID:34721844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8540880/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The rRT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis is affected by long turnaround time, potential shortage of reagents, high false-negative rates and high costs. Routine hematochemical tests are a faster and less expensive alternative for diagnosis. Thus, Machine Learning (ML) has been applied to hematological parameters to develop diagnostic tools and help clinicians in promptly managing positive patients. However, few ML models have been externally validated, making their real-world applicability unclear.

METHODS

We externally validate 6 state-of-the-art diagnostic ML models, based on Complete Blood Count (CBC) and trained on a dataset encompassing 816 COVID-19 positive cases. The external validation was performed based on two datasets, collected at two different hospitals in northern Italy and encompassing 163 and 104 COVID-19 positive cases, in terms of both error rate and calibration.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

We report an average AUC of 95% and average Brier score of 0.11, out-performing existing ML methods, and showing good cross-site transportability. The best performing model (SVM) reported an average AUC of 97.5% (Sensitivity: 87.5%, Specificity: 94%), comparable with the performance of RT-PCR, and was also the best calibrated. The validated models can be useful in the early identification of potential COVID-19 patients, due to the rapid availability of CBC exams, and in multiple test settings.

摘要

目的

用于新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)诊断的逆转录实时聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)受到周转时间长、试剂可能短缺、高假阴性率和高成本的影响。常规血液生化检查是一种更快且成本更低的诊断替代方法。因此,机器学习(ML)已应用于血液学参数以开发诊断工具,并帮助临床医生及时管理阳性患者。然而,很少有ML模型经过外部验证,其在现实世界中的适用性尚不清楚。

方法

我们基于全血细胞计数(CBC)对6个最先进的诊断ML模型进行了外部验证,这些模型在包含816例COVID-19阳性病例的数据集上进行训练。外部验证基于在意大利北部两家不同医院收集的两个数据集进行,这两个数据集分别包含163例和104例COVID-19阳性病例,评估指标包括错误率和校准情况。

结果与结论

我们报告的平均曲线下面积(AUC)为95%,平均布里尔评分(Brier score)为0.11,优于现有的ML方法,并显示出良好的跨站点可移植性。表现最佳的模型(支持向量机,SVM)报告的平均AUC为97.5%(敏感性:87.5%,特异性:94%),与逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的性能相当,并且校准效果也是最好的。由于CBC检查可快速获得,经过验证的模型在早期识别潜在的COVID-19患者以及在多种检测环境中可能会很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/b2579c771b75/13755_2021_167_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/be2ccef51bd1/13755_2021_167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/5c7da209f23b/13755_2021_167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/76a691669bad/13755_2021_167_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/743f823f4489/13755_2021_167_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/311ce42419b0/13755_2021_167_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/42bf7c49cb84/13755_2021_167_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/7c4177430079/13755_2021_167_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/504df6b108f4/13755_2021_167_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/0b65a0f95121/13755_2021_167_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/b2579c771b75/13755_2021_167_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/be2ccef51bd1/13755_2021_167_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/5c7da209f23b/13755_2021_167_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/76a691669bad/13755_2021_167_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/743f823f4489/13755_2021_167_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/311ce42419b0/13755_2021_167_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/42bf7c49cb84/13755_2021_167_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/7c4177430079/13755_2021_167_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/504df6b108f4/13755_2021_167_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/0b65a0f95121/13755_2021_167_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8f/8542028/b2579c771b75/13755_2021_167_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
External validation of Machine Learning models for COVID-19 detection based on Complete Blood Count.基于全血细胞计数的COVID-19检测机器学习模型的外部验证
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Oct 23;9(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00167-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Development, evaluation, and validation of machine learning models for COVID-19 detection based on routine blood tests.基于常规血液检测的 COVID-19 检测机器学习模型的开发、评估和验证。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Oct 21;59(2):421-431. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1294.
3
QCovSML: A reliable COVID-19 detection system using CBC biomarkers by a stacking machine learning model.QCovSML:一种通过堆叠机器学习模型使用全血细胞计数生物标志物的可靠的新冠病毒检测系统。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Apr;143:105284. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105284. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
4
Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study.利用机器学习从常规血液检查中检测 COVID-19 感染:一项可行性研究。
J Med Syst. 2020 Jul 1;44(8):135. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01597-4.
5
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.
6
Development and Validation of a Robust and Interpretable Early Triaging Support System for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Predictive Algorithm Modeling and Interpretation Study.开发和验证用于 COVID-19 住院患者的强大且可解释的早期分诊支持系统:预测算法建模和解释研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 11;26:e52134. doi: 10.2196/52134.
7
How is test laboratory data used and characterised by machine learning models? A systematic review of diagnostic and prognostic models developed for COVID-19 patients using only laboratory data.测试实验室数据如何被机器学习模型使用和表征?对仅使用实验室数据为新冠肺炎患者开发的诊断和预后模型的系统评价。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 May 5;60(12):1887-1901. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0182. Print 2022 Nov 25.
8
Machine learning-based derivation and external validation of a tool to predict death and development of organ failure in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.基于机器学习的工具的推导和外部验证,用于预测住院 COVID-19 患者的死亡和器官衰竭的发展。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 8;12(1):16913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20724-4.
9
Routine blood tests as a potential diagnostic tool for COVID-19.常规血液检查可作为 COVID-19 的潜在诊断工具。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1095-1099. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0398.
10
The importance of being external. methodological insights for the external validation of machine learning models in medicine.重视外部性。医学中机器学习模型外部验证的方法学见解。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Sep;208:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106288. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning in the discovery of antiviral peptides and peptidomimetics: databases and prediction tools.抗病毒肽和肽模拟物发现中的深度学习:数据库与预测工具
Mol Divers. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s11030-025-11173-y.
2
Sharing reliable information worldwide: healthcare strategies based on artificial intelligence need external validation. Position paper.在全球范围内分享可靠信息:基于人工智能的医疗保健策略需要外部验证。立场文件。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02883-2.
3
The external validity of machine learning-based prediction scores from hematological parameters of COVID-19: A study using hospital records from Brazil, Italy, and Western Europe.

本文引用的文献

1
The need to separate the wheat from the chaff in medical informatics: Introducing a comprehensive checklist for the (self)-assessment of medical AI studies.需要在医学信息学中去芜存菁:引入全面的清单,用于(自我)评估医学人工智能研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Sep;153:104510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104510. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
2
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.具有二元结局的临床预测模型外部验证的最小样本量
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4230-4251. doi: 10.1002/sim.9025. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
COVID-19 diagnosis by routine blood tests using machine learning.
基于新冠肺炎血液学参数的机器学习预测评分的外部有效性:一项使用巴西、意大利和西欧医院记录的研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 4;20(2):e0316467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316467. eCollection 2025.
4
Comparing machine learning screening approaches using clinical data and cytokine profiles for COVID-19 in resource-limited and resource-abundant settings.比较资源有限和资源丰富环境下使用临床数据和细胞因子谱进行 COVID-19 机器学习筛查方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 28;14(1):14892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63707-3.
5
Artificial intelligence-based framework to identify the abnormalities in the COVID-19 disease and other common respiratory diseases from digital stethoscope data using deep CNN.基于人工智能的框架,利用深度卷积神经网络从数字听诊器数据中识别新冠肺炎及其他常见呼吸道疾病的异常情况。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2024 Mar 9;12(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s13755-024-00283-w. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Leukocyte cell population data as potential markers of COVID-19 disease characterization.白细胞细胞群体数据作为新冠病毒疾病特征的潜在标志物。
J Med Biochem. 2023 Aug 25;42(3):454-459. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-41589.
7
How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey.家庭医生如何诊断 COVID-19?全血细胞计数作为 COVID-19 诊断工具的可用性:土耳其的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):e069493. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069493.
8
Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Search for New Information Through Routine Laboratory Tests: Systematic Review.通过常规实验室检查利用人工智能搜索新信息:系统评价
JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2022 Dec 23;3(1):e40473. doi: 10.2196/40473. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Use of Machine Learning and Routine Laboratory Tests for Diabetes Mellitus Screening.使用机器学习和常规实验室检测进行糖尿病筛查。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 29;2022:8114049. doi: 10.1155/2022/8114049. eCollection 2022.
利用机器学习通过常规血液检测诊断 COVID-19。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10738. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90265-9.
4
Rapid triage for COVID-19 using routine clinical data for patients attending hospital: development and prospective validation of an artificial intelligence screening test.利用常规临床数据对就诊患者进行 COVID-19 的快速分诊:人工智能筛查测试的开发和前瞻性验证。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Feb;3(2):e78-e87. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30274-0. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.
6
Development, evaluation, and validation of machine learning models for COVID-19 detection based on routine blood tests.基于常规血液检测的 COVID-19 检测机器学习模型的开发、评估和验证。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Oct 21;59(2):421-431. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1294.
7
A survey on artificial intelligence approaches in supporting frontline workers and decision makers for the COVID-19 pandemic.关于人工智能方法在支持一线工作者和决策者应对新冠疫情方面的一项调查。
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Dec;141:110337. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110337. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
The sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19.胸部 CT 诊断 COVID-19 的敏感性和特异性。
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2819-2824. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07347-x. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
9
Deus Ex Machina? Predicting SARS-CoV-2 Infection from Lab Tests Using Machine Learning.解围之神?利用机器学习通过实验室检测预测新冠病毒感染
Clin Chem. 2020 Nov 1;66(11):1365-1366. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa212.
10
Chest x-ray in the COVID-19 pandemic: Radiologists' real-world reader performance.COVID-19 大流行期间的胸部 X 光片:放射科医生的真实世界读者表现。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Nov;132:109272. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109272. Epub 2020 Sep 10.