• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能结合大数据预测前列腺癌淋巴结转移:一项基于人群的研究。

Artificial Intelligence Combined With Big Data to Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

作者信息

Wei Liwei, Huang Yongdi, Chen Zheng, Lei Hongyu, Qin Xiaoping, Cui Lihong, Zhuo Yumin

机构信息

Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

College of Mathematics and Physics, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 14;11:763381. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.763381. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.763381
PMID:34722318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8551611/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A more accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node involvement (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) would improve clinical treatment and follow-up strategies of this disease. We developed a predictive model based on machine learning (ML) combined with big data to achieve this.

METHODS

Clinicopathological characteristics of 2,884 PCa patients who underwent extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were collected from the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Eight variables were included to establish an ML model. Model performance was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots for predictive accuracy. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and cutoff values were obtained to estimate its clinical utility.

RESULTS

Three hundred and forty-four (11.9%) patients were identified with LNI. The five most important factors were the Gleason score, T stage of disease, percentage of positive cores, tumor size, and prostate-specific antigen levels with 158, 137, 128, 113, and 88 points, respectively. The XGBoost (XGB) model showed the best predictive performance and had the highest net benefit when compared with the other algorithms, achieving an area under the curve of 0.883. With a 5%~20% cutoff value, the XGB model performed best in reducing omissions and avoiding overtreatment of patients when dealing with LNI. This model also had a lower false-negative rate and a higher percentage of ePLND was avoided. In addition, DCA showed it has the highest net benefit across the whole range of threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

We established an ML model based on big data for predicting LNI in PCa, and it could lead to a reduction of approximately 50% of ePLND cases. In addition, only ≤3% of patients were misdiagnosed with a cutoff value ranging from 5% to 20%. This promising study warrants further validation by using a larger prospective dataset.

摘要

背景

对前列腺癌(PCa)淋巴结受累情况(LNI)进行更准确的术前预测,将改善该疾病的临床治疗和随访策略。我们基于机器学习(ML)结合大数据开发了一种预测模型来实现这一目标。

方法

从美国国立癌症研究所的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中收集了2010年至2015年期间接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)的2884例PCa患者的临床病理特征。纳入八个变量建立ML模型。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线和校准图评估模型性能以预测准确性。获得决策曲线分析(DCA)和临界值以评估其临床实用性。

结果

344例(11.9%)患者被确诊为LNI。五个最重要的因素分别是 Gleason评分、疾病T分期、阳性核心百分比、肿瘤大小和前列腺特异性抗原水平,分别为158分、137分、128分、113分和88分。与其他算法相比,XGBoost(XGB)模型显示出最佳的预测性能和最高的净效益,曲线下面积达到0.883。在5%至20%的临界值下,XGB模型在处理LNI时减少漏诊和避免患者过度治疗方面表现最佳。该模型还具有较低的假阴性率,避免ePLND的比例更高。此外,DCA显示在整个阈值概率范围内它具有最高的净效益。

结论

我们基于大数据建立了一种用于预测PCa中LNI的ML模型,它可使ePLND病例减少约50%。此外,在5%至20%的临界值范围内,只有≤3%的患者被误诊。这项有前景的研究值得使用更大的前瞻性数据集进行进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence Combined With Big Data to Predict Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.人工智能结合大数据预测前列腺癌淋巴结转移:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 14;11:763381. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.763381. eCollection 2021.
2
Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer.开发并内部验证一种新型模型,以确定前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的候选者。
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):632-640. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.049. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
3
Development and internal validation of a novel nomogram for predicting lymph node invasion for prostate cancer patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.一种用于预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯的新型列线图的开发与内部验证
Front Oncol. 2023 May 8;13:1186319. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1186319. eCollection 2023.
4
Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores.更新的列线图预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者的淋巴结侵犯:阳性核心百分比的重要性。
Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
5
Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients: the additional value depends on preoperative data.前列腺癌患者的腹腔镜前哨淋巴结清扫术:附加价值取决于术前数据。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Sep;43(10):1849-56. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3397-2. Epub 2016 May 11.
6
External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯的更新列线图的外部验证
Urol Int. 2013;90(3):277-82. doi: 10.1159/000343993. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
7
External Validation of Models Predicting the Probability of Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients.模型预测前列腺癌患者淋巴结受累概率的外部验证。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies.一种新的列线图模型,用于识别经 MRI 靶向和系统活检诊断为局限性前列腺癌患者中需要行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的候选者。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
9
External Validation of the 2019 Briganti Nomogram for the Identification of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Should Be Considered for an Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.2019 年 Briganti 列线图对前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的评估作用的外部验证。
Eur Urol. 2020 Aug;78(2):138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
10
Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.当代接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗的前列腺癌患者中 CT 检测淋巴结转移的性能特征。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中的人工智能
Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 Aug 5;138(15):1769-1782. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003689. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Utility of Machine Learning Models to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis of Japanese Localized Prostate Cancer.机器学习模型预测日本局限性前列腺癌淋巴结转移的效用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;16(23):4073. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234073.
3
A Comparison of Systematic, Targeted, and Combined Biopsy Using Machine Learning for Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk: A Multi-Center Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning for Early Warning of Septic Shock in Children With Hematological Malignancies Accompanied by Fever or Neutropenia: A Single Center Retrospective Study.机器学习用于伴有发热或中性粒细胞减少的血液系统恶性肿瘤儿童脓毒性休克的早期预警:一项单中心回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 15;11:678743. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.678743. eCollection 2021.
2
External Validation of the Briganti Nomogram to Predict Lymph Node Invasion in Prostate Cancer-Setting a New Threshold Value.用于预测前列腺癌淋巴结浸润的布里甘蒂列线图的外部验证——设定新的阈值
Life (Basel). 2021 May 25;11(6):479. doi: 10.3390/life11060479.
3
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prognostic Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Surgical Resection.
基于机器学习的系统、靶向和联合活检预测前列腺癌风险的比较:一项多中心研究。
Med Princ Pract. 2024;33(5):491-500. doi: 10.1159/000540425. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
4
The predictive value of machine learning and nomograms for lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习和列线图预测前列腺癌淋巴结转移的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Sep;26(3):602-613. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00704-z. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
5
A machine learning-based model for predicting the risk of early-stage inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.一种基于机器学习的模型,用于预测阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者早期腹股沟淋巴结转移的风险。
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 17;10:1095545. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1095545. eCollection 2023.
6
A Machine Learning Approach Using XGBoost Predicts Lung Metastasis in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.基于 XGBoost 的机器学习方法预测卵巢癌患者的肺转移。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 12;2022:8501819. doi: 10.1155/2022/8501819. eCollection 2022.
7
Machine learning model for the prediction of prostate cancer in patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels: A multicenter retrospective analysis.用于预测前列腺特异性抗原水平低的患者患前列腺癌的机器学习模型:一项多中心回顾性分析。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 18;12:985940. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.985940. eCollection 2022.
8
Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy-Do We Know the Proper Way of Management?根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后淋巴结阳性的患者——我们知道正确的处理方法吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 8;14(9):2326. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092326.
一种用于肝细胞癌手术切除后复发的机器学习预后模型的开发与验证
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 1;10:593741. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.593741. eCollection 2020.
4
Eight ways machine learning is assisting medicine.机器学习助力医学的八种方式。
Nat Med. 2021 Jan;27(1):2-3. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01197-2.
5
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2020 版更新。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
7
KLK3 and TMPRSS2 for molecular lymph-node staging in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.KLK3 和 TMPRSS2 用于接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的分子淋巴结分期。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):362-369. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00283-3. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Indications for and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: accuracy of available nomograms for the prediction of lymph node invasion.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫的适应证与并发症:预测淋巴结侵犯的现有列线图的准确性
BJU Int. 2021 Mar;127(3):318-325. doi: 10.1111/bju.15220. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
9
Cancer survival statistics for patients and healthcare professionals - a tutorial of real-world data analysis.癌症患者和医疗保健专业人员的生存统计数据——真实世界数据分析教程。
J Intern Med. 2021 Jan;289(1):12-28. doi: 10.1111/joim.13139. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Utility of index lesion volume assessed by multiparametric MRI combined with Gleason grade for assessment of lymph node involvement in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.多参数 MRI 评估的指数病变体积联合 Gleason 分级在评估高危前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯中的作用。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 9;50(3):333-337. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz170.