• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行、中国、印度、伊朗和巴基斯坦(CIIP)的政府应对措施和政策影响。

COVID-19 pandemic, government response, and policy implications in China, India, Iran, and Pakistan (CIIP).

机构信息

College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8554-5485.

College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

J Emerg Manag. 2021;18(7):49-61. doi: 10.5055/jem.0529.

DOI:10.5055/jem.0529
PMID:34723347
Abstract

COVID-19 has been considered as a catastrophic global health response mechanism and demonstrated the international preparedness for the outbreak as well as government initiatives. This study aims to evaluate the comparative analysis of government response in China, India, Iran, and Pakistan (CIIP) countries regarding their policy enforcement on combating COVID-19 by using stringency, socioeconomic, and health containment indices. The proposed study analyzed the policy implications in CIIP from January 1, 2020 through July 21, 2020. Data have been collected from the European Union, World Health Organization, Humanitarian Exchange, and a selected National Database. Results show that despite a high degree of government's strict policies in India and Pakistan, they have been failing to control the brutality of the COVID-19. In contrast, the politics of China and Iran appear to be very successful in combating the situation in COVID-19. This study concludes that countries with ample resources and stronger coping strategies should provide developing countries with the mean for mitigating and improve their socioeconomic and economic crises, which hindered their consistent policy enforcement during the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

COVID-19 被认为是一场灾难性的全球卫生应对机制,它展示了国际社会对疫情的准备情况以及各国政府的应对举措。本研究旨在评估中国、印度、伊朗和巴基斯坦(CIIP)四国政府在应对 COVID-19 方面的比较分析,使用了严格程度、社会经济和卫生控制指数。本研究分析了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 7 月 21 日期间 CIIP 的政策影响。数据来自欧盟、世界卫生组织、人道主义交流以及选定的国家数据库。结果表明,尽管印度和巴基斯坦政府采取了高度严格的政策,但仍未能控制 COVID-19 的肆虐。相比之下,中国和伊朗的政治似乎在应对 COVID-19 方面非常成功。本研究得出结论,资源充足且应对策略更强的国家应向发展中国家提供缓解和改善其社会经济和经济危机的手段,这阻碍了它们在 COVID-19 大流行期间持续执行政策。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 pandemic, government response, and policy implications in China, India, Iran, and Pakistan (CIIP).COVID-19 大流行、中国、印度、伊朗和巴基斯坦(CIIP)的政府应对措施和政策影响。
J Emerg Manag. 2021;18(7):49-61. doi: 10.5055/jem.0529.
2
Pakistan's COVID-19 Outbreak Preparedness and Response: A Situational Analysis.巴基斯坦的 COVID-19 疫情暴发准备和应对情况:形势分析。
Health Secur. 2021 Nov;19(6):605-615. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0006. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
3
COVID-19 Pandemic and Comparative Health Policy Learning in Iran.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情与伊朗的比较健康政策学习。
Arch Iran Med. 2020 Apr 1;23(4):220-234. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.02.
4
Pakistan's Response to COVID-19: Overcoming National and International Hypes to Fight the Pandemic.巴基斯坦应对 COVID-19 大流行:克服国内外炒作,共同抗击疫情。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 May 19;7(5):e28517. doi: 10.2196/28517.
5
Coronavirus pandemic in the South Asia region: Health policy and economy trade-off.南亚地区的冠状病毒大流行:卫生政策与经济权衡。
J Glob Health. 2023 May 5;13:06014. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06014.
6
Reasons behind declining of cases during the COVID-19 wavelets in Pakistan: public healthcare system or government smart lockdown policy?巴基斯坦新冠疫情小波期间病例下降的原因:公共医疗体系还是政府明智的封锁政策?
Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Aug;27(8):2973-2984. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232022278.06012022. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
8
Requestioning the Indonesia Government's Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Black Box Analysis for the Period of January-July 2020.质疑印尼政府对 COVID-19 大流行的公共政策反应:2020 年 1 月至 7 月期间的黑箱分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 10;9:612994. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.612994. eCollection 2021.
9
Strengthening health system building blocks: configuring post-COVID-19 scenario in Pakistan.加强卫生系统建设:为巴基斯坦 COVID-19 后情景配置。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Mar 25;22:e9. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000128.
10
Searching for Digital Technologies in Containment and Mitigation Strategies: Experience from South Korea COVID-19.搜索遏制和缓解策略中的数字技术:来自韩国 COVID-19 的经验。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Aug 31;86(1):109. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2993.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of administrative state capacity determinants on sustainable healthcare.行政国家能力决定因素对可持续医疗保健的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 14;9(7):e18273. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18273. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Impacts of COVID-19 Pandemic on Dermatology Outpatient Department at a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern China: A Pre-Post Study.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情对中国东部一家三级医院皮肤科门诊的影响:一项前后对照研究
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Nov 18;15:2507-2518. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S389496. eCollection 2022.
3
Impact of cybersecurity measures on improving institutional governance and digitalization for sustainable healthcare.
网络安全措施对改善机构治理和实现可持续医疗数字化的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 15;17(11):e0274550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274550. eCollection 2022.
4
Uneven Implications of Lockdown Amid COVID-19 in India: From Harassment, Stigma, Crime, and Internally Displaced People to Stress and Coping Strategies in the Middle/Upper Class.印度新冠疫情封锁措施的不均衡影响:从骚扰、污名化、犯罪和国内流离失所者到中/上层阶级的压力与应对策略
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;12(10):348. doi: 10.3390/bs12100348.
5
Handling COVID-19 in the capital city of Jakarta with innovation policy: the scale of social restrictions policy.通过创新政策应对雅加达首都特区的新冠疫情:社会限制政策的规模
Heliyon. 2022 May;8(5):e09467. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09467. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
COVID-19 pandemic control and administrative issues in Pakistan: How Pakistan mitigated both pandemic and administration issues?巴基斯坦的新冠疫情防控与行政问题:巴基斯坦如何缓解疫情及行政问题?
J Public Aff. 2021 Sep 13:e2760. doi: 10.1002/pa.2760.