Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Becker); PracticeWise, Satellite Beach, Florida (Daleiden); Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, and Jane and Terry Semel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles (Kataoka, Best); Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Edwards, Donohue); Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (Chorpita).
Am J Psychother. 2022 Jun 15;75(2):82-88. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210010. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
This pilot study aimed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility, acceptability, and instructional efficacy of the Managing and Adapting Practice (MAP) curriculum for enhancing the teaching of psychotherapy to child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) fellows. MAP is a system of resources and decision models that supports practitioners in selecting and implementing psychotherapeutic interventions for children and adolescents. The MAP curriculum includes modules to guide education about psychotherapeutic procedures (e.g., behavioral activation) common in evidence-based treatments for an array of childhood problems and to support development of competencies in assessment, treatment planning, and reflective practice.
Curriculum coding was used to examine the relevance of MAP's core components to the skills articulated in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) CAP milestones. Feasibility, acceptability, and learning outcomes were examined after delivery of the MAP curriculum to 12 CAP fellows at two sites, with instructional features tailored according to faculty preferences and training program structure.
Coding suggested that the MAP curriculum was relevant to 95% of the 21 ACGME CAP training subcompetencies. Feasibility was indicated by the successful delivery of 100% of the planned MAP curriculum across the two sites. Acceptability was supported by positive feedback from the CAP fellows, and psychotherapy knowledge increased significantly. Finally, case review scores (mean±SD=2.21±0.15) showed positive posttraining application of MAP to two patients and exceeded scores achieved by other samples of mental health professionals.
This pilot study demonstrated the potential for the MAP curriculum to support CAP education. MAP's versatility as a curriculum supports broader adoption, with continuing rigorous empirical evaluation.
本初步研究旨在评估管理和适应实践(MAP)课程对于增强儿童和青少年精神病学(CAP)研究员心理治疗教学的相关性、可行性、可接受性和教学效果。MAP 是一种资源和决策模型系统,支持从业者为儿童和青少年选择和实施心理治疗干预措施。MAP 课程包括指导有关常见于各种儿童问题的循证治疗的心理治疗程序(例如行为激活)的教育模块,并支持评估、治疗计划和反思实践方面的能力发展。
使用课程编码来检查 MAP 的核心组成部分与研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)CAP 里程碑中阐述的技能的相关性。在两个地点向 12 名 CAP 研究员提供 MAP 课程后,检查了可行性、可接受性和学习成果,并根据教师偏好和培训计划结构调整了教学特点。
编码表明,MAP 课程与 21 项 ACGME CAP 培训子能力中的 95%相关。在两个地点成功完成了 100%的计划 MAP 课程,这表明可行性。CAP 研究员的积极反馈支持了可接受性,并且心理治疗知识显著增加。最后,病例审查评分(平均值±标准差=2.21±0.15)显示 MAP 在两名患者中的应用具有积极的培训后效果,超过了其他心理健康专业人员样本的分数。
本初步研究表明,MAP 课程有可能支持 CAP 教育。MAP 作为课程的多功能性支持更广泛的采用,并继续进行严格的实证评估。