• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰理赔数据中慢性心力衰竭患者长期住院和全因死亡率的预测:一种机器学习方法。

Prediction of long-term hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure on Dutch claims data: a machine learning approach.

机构信息

Zilveren Kruis Achmea, Zeist, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 1;21(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01657-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01657-w
PMID:34724933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8561992/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurately predicting which patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are particularly vulnerable for adverse outcomes is of crucial importance to support clinical decision making. The goal of the current study was to examine the predictive value on long term heart failure (HF) hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in CHF patients, by exploring and exploiting machine learning (ML) and traditional statistical techniques on a Dutch health insurance claims database.

METHODS

Our study population consisted of 25,776 patients with a CHF diagnosis code between 2012 and 2014 and one year and three years follow-up HF hospitalisation (1446 and 3220 patients respectively) and all-cause mortality (2434 and 7882 patients respectively) were measured from 2015 to 2018. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated after modelling the data using Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Elastic Net regression and Neural Networks.

RESULTS

AUC rates ranged from 0.710 to 0.732 for 1-year HF hospitalisation, 0.705-0.733 for 3-years HF hospitalisation, 0.765-0.787 for 1-year mortality and 0.764-0.791 for 3-years mortality. Elastic Net performed best for all endpoints. Differences between techniques were small and only statistically significant between Elastic Net and Logistic Regression compared with Random Forest for 3-years HF hospitalisation.

CONCLUSION

In this study based on a health insurance claims database we found clear predictive value for predicting long-term HF hospitalisation and mortality of CHF patients by using ML techniques compared to traditional statistics.

摘要

背景

准确预测哪些慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者特别容易出现不良结局对于支持临床决策至关重要。本研究的目的是通过探索和利用荷兰医疗保险索赔数据库中的机器学习(ML)和传统统计技术,检查其对 CHF 患者长期心力衰竭(HF)住院和全因死亡率的预测价值。

方法

我们的研究人群由 25776 名 2012 年至 2014 年间患有 CHF 诊断代码且在 2015 年至 2018 年间有一年和三年随访 HF 住院(分别为 1446 和 3220 名患者)和全因死亡率(分别为 2434 和 7882 名患者)的患者组成。使用 Logistic Regression、Random Forest、Elastic Net Regression 和 Neural Networks 对数据进行建模后,计算受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)。

结果

1 年 HF 住院的 AUC 率范围为 0.710 至 0.732,3 年 HF 住院的 AUC 率为 0.705-0.733,1 年死亡率的 AUC 率为 0.765-0.787,3 年死亡率的 AUC 率为 0.764-0.791。Elastic Net 在所有终点中表现最好。技术之间的差异很小,仅在与 Random Forest 相比时,Elastic Net 与 Logistic Regression 之间在 3 年 HF 住院方面具有统计学意义。

结论

在这项基于医疗保险索赔数据库的研究中,我们发现与传统统计学相比,使用 ML 技术对 CHF 患者的长期 HF 住院和死亡率具有明显的预测价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8767/8561992/987ac3d81321/12911_2021_1657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8767/8561992/bf2f3a03154d/12911_2021_1657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8767/8561992/987ac3d81321/12911_2021_1657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8767/8561992/bf2f3a03154d/12911_2021_1657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8767/8561992/987ac3d81321/12911_2021_1657_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of long-term hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure on Dutch claims data: a machine learning approach.荷兰理赔数据中慢性心力衰竭患者长期住院和全因死亡率的预测:一种机器学习方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 1;21(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01657-w.
2
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods With Traditional Models for Use of Administrative Claims With Electronic Medical Records to Predict Heart Failure Outcomes.利用电子病历中的行政索赔数据进行机器学习方法与传统模型预测心力衰竭结局的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18962.
3
Machine learning-based risk prediction of malignant arrhythmia in hospitalized patients with heart failure.基于机器学习的心力衰竭住院患者恶性心律失常风险预测。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):5363-5371. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13627. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Leveraging Machine Learning Techniques to Forecast Patient Prognosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.利用机器学习技术预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的患者预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 22;12(14):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.035. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
5
Machine learning prognosis model based on patient-reported outcomes for chronic heart failure patients after discharge.基于患者报告结局的慢性心力衰竭患者出院后机器学习预后模型。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Mar 29;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02109-x.
6
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Hospital Readmissions and Worsening Heart Failure Events in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Modeling Study.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者再入院及心力衰竭恶化事件预测的机器学习算法比较:建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 17;7:e41775. doi: 10.2196/41775.
7
Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
9
A Novel Composite Indicator of Predicting Mortality Risk for Heart Failure Patients With Diabetes Admitted to Intensive Care Unit Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的 ICU 收治糖尿病心力衰竭患者死亡风险预测的新型综合指标。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;13:917838. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.917838. eCollection 2022.
10
Machine ​learning algorithms for claims data-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure.基于索赔数据的机器学习算法预测心力衰竭患者住院死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3026-3036. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13398. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.用于预测心力衰竭死亡率和再入院的机器学习方法评估:荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04700-0.
2
Identifying Predictors of Heart Failure Readmission in Patients From a Statutory Health Insurance Database: Retrospective Machine Learning Study.从法定健康保险数据库中识别心力衰竭再入院患者的预测因素:回顾性机器学习研究。
JMIR Cardio. 2024 Jul 23;8:e54994. doi: 10.2196/54994.
3
Use of big data from health insurance for assessment of cardiovascular outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
2
Impact of sex differences in co-morbidities and medication adherence on outcome in 25 776 heart failure patients.25776例心力衰竭患者中,合并症和药物依从性方面的性别差异对预后的影响
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):63-73. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13113. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
3
Interpretation of machine learning predictions for patient outcomes in electronic health records.
利用健康保险大数据评估心血管疾病转归。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 May 3;6:1155404. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1155404. eCollection 2023.
4
Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于心电图的人工智能用于心力衰竭诊断:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Dec 28;19(12):970-980. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.12.002.
电子健康记录中患者预后机器学习预测的解读。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:572-581. eCollection 2019.
4
Machine learning can predict survival of patients with heart failure from serum creatinine and ejection fraction alone.机器学习仅通过血清肌酐和射血分数即可预测心力衰竭患者的生存情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1023-5.
5
Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling-perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences.整合机器学习与多尺度建模——生物学、生物医学和行为科学中的观点、挑战与机遇
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Nov 25;2:115. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0193-y. eCollection 2019.
6
Machine Learning Prediction of Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.机器学习预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Jan;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Machine learning for prediction of sudden cardiac death in heart failure patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction: study protocol for a retroprospective multicentre registry in China.机器学习用于预测左心室射血分数低的心力衰竭患者的心源性猝死:中国一项回顾性多中心注册研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 May 16;9(5):e023724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023724.
8
LSTM Model for Prediction of Heart Failure in Big Data.基于大数据的心力衰竭预测 LSTM 模型
J Med Syst. 2019 Mar 19;43(5):111. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1243-3.
9
Machine learning-based prediction of heart failure readmission or death: implications of choosing the right model and the right metrics.基于机器学习的心力衰竭再入院或死亡预测:选择正确模型和指标的意义。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):428-435. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12419. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Dynamic prediction of hospital admission with medical claim data.利用医疗索赔数据进行住院动态预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 31;19(Suppl 1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0734-y.