Black Sara
Centre for Education Rights and Transformation, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Int Rev Educ. 2022;68(5):673-689. doi: 10.1007/s11159-021-09924-8. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
This article seeks to examine how two discourses -of and - tangle with each other in South African education policy imaginaries, particularly the latter discourse as a response to an (arguably manufactured) frame of "crisis". The author suggests that the discourse of lifelong learning constructs a relation of what Lauren Berlant terms "cruel optimism" for the marginalised majority of South Africans, sustaining a fantasy of liberatory education despite empirical evidence to the contrary. First, the prevalence of this discourse in key policy texts (predominantly education policy white papers) is examined, along with how both instrumentalist humanist framings of lifelong learning promote and sustain this relation in spite of the ordinariness of the "attrition of the subject" (in Berlant's terms) as a defining experience of everyday life. Next, the ubiquitous frame of crisis in education analysis in South Africa is considered, along with techno-solutionism (a term coined by Evgeny Morozov in 2013) as a popular response amongst the dominant middle-class minority. The article suggests that cruel optimism is sustained for this middle-class group through techno-solutionist education utopias, as what Berlant terms a "redefinitional strategy" for manufacturing ahistorical moments of agency in the face of persistent structural issues centuries in the making. The lens of cruel optimism is thus offered as a mechanism for denaturalising the political work of both discourses, a necessary (albeit insufficient) move towards better grasping the nature of South African education concerns, as well as theories of change that might offer genuinely emancipatory learning for all.
本文旨在探讨两种话语——终身学习话语和危机话语——如何在南非教育政策想象中相互交织,尤其是后一种话语作为对(可以说是人为制造的)“危机”框架的回应。作者认为,终身学习话语为南非大多数边缘化群体构建了一种劳伦·伯兰特所说的“残酷的乐观主义”关系,尽管有相反的实证证据,但仍维持着一种解放性教育的幻想。首先,考察了这种话语在关键政策文本(主要是教育政策白皮书)中的盛行情况,以及终身学习的工具主义和人文主义框架如何尽管“主体的损耗”(用伯兰特的话说)作为日常生活的一种决定性经历很平常,但仍促进并维持了这种关系。接下来,考虑了南非教育分析中普遍存在的危机框架,以及技术解决主义(叶夫根尼·莫罗佐夫在2013年创造的一个术语)作为占主导地位的中产阶级少数群体中一种流行的回应。文章认为,通过技术解决主义的教育乌托邦,这种中产阶级群体的残酷乐观主义得以维持,这是伯兰特所说的一种“重新定义策略”,用于在面对持续了几个世纪的结构性问题时制造脱离历史的行动时刻。因此,残酷乐观主义的视角被作为一种机制,用于使这两种话语的政治工作非自然化,这是朝着更好地理解南非教育问题的本质以及可能为所有人提供真正解放性学习的变革理论迈出的必要(尽管不充分)的一步。