Koob Valentin, Ulrich Rolf, Janczyk Markus
Department of Psychology.
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jan;130(1):102-136. doi: 10.1037/rev0000326. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
In dual-task experiments, overlapping response characteristics of two subsequently performed tasks may not only affect performance in Task 2 but also in Task 1. This phenomenon is often explained through activated Task 2 response information influencing Task 1 response selection, which then possibly propagates again into Task 2. So far, however, only little is known about (a) the time course of this Task 2 response activation and (b) possible transmission/propagation mechanisms. The present study addressed both issues by testing 10 plausible drift-diffusion models with 5 data sets from dual-task experiments. To this end, we first examined if the temporal course of the response activation is linearly increasing or pulse like. The pulse-like model turned out to be superior, but the corresponding dynamics of the response activation often described a monotonically increasing function that reached its peak late during Task 1 processing. By extending the pulse-like model with an additional diffusion process, we then examined whether and how the Task 2 response information could affect subsequent Task 2 response selection. Concerning the transmission mechanisms, none of the assumed models proved to be entirely satisfactory. However, additional simulations suggest that Task 2 response activation-transmission does not occur at all. Instead, a model in which Task 2 started with a trace of the previous Task 1 response (i.e., irrespective of the preexisting Task 2 activation) turned out to be the most promising account. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
在双重任务实验中,两个相继执行的任务重叠的反应特征不仅可能影响任务2的表现,还可能影响任务1的表现。这种现象通常通过激活的任务2反应信息影响任务1的反应选择来解释,然后这种影响可能再次传播到任务2中。然而,到目前为止,对于(a)这种任务2反应激活的时间进程以及(b)可能的传递/传播机制,人们了解得还很少。本研究通过用来自双重任务实验的5个数据集测试10个合理的漂移扩散模型来解决这两个问题。为此,我们首先检查反应激活的时间进程是线性增加还是呈脉冲状。结果发现脉冲状模型更优,但反应激活的相应动态通常描述的是一个单调递增函数,在任务1处理后期达到峰值。通过用一个额外的扩散过程扩展脉冲状模型,我们接着研究任务2反应信息是否以及如何能够影响后续的任务2反应选择。关于传递机制,没有一个假设模型被证明是完全令人满意的。然而,额外的模拟表明任务2反应激活传递根本不会发生。相反,一个任务2从先前任务1反应的痕迹开始的模型(即,与预先存在的任务2激活无关)被证明是最有前景的解释。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)