Gómez-Fernández Alicia, Osborne Colin P, Rees Mark, Palomino Javier, Ingala Carlos, Gómez Guillermo, Milla Rubén
Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, C/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles, 28933, Spain.
Plants, Photosynthesis and Soil, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
New Phytol. 2022 Jan;233(2):995-1010. doi: 10.1111/nph.17840. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Growth rates vary widely among plants with different strategies. For crops, evolution under predictable and high-resource environments might favour rapid resource acquisition and growth, but whether this strategy has consistently evolved during domestication and improvement remains unclear. Here we report a comprehensive study of the evolution of growth rates based on comparisons among wild, landrace, and improved accessions of 19 herbaceous crops grown under common conditions. We also examined the underlying growth components and the influence of crop origin and history on growth evolution. Domestication and improvement did not affect growth consistently, that is growth rates increased or decreased or remained unchanged in different crops. Crops selected for fruits increased the physiological component of growth (net assimilation rate), whereas leaf and seed crops showed larger domestication effects on morphology (leaf mass ratio and specific leaf area). Moreover, climate and phylogeny contributed to explaining the effects of domestication and changes in growth. Crop-specific responses to domestication and improvement suggest that selection for high yield has not consistently changed growth rates. The trade-offs between morpho-physiological traits and the distinct origins and histories of crops accounted for the variability in growth changes. These findings have far-reaching implications for our understanding of crop performance and adaptation.
不同策略的植物生长速率差异很大。对于农作物而言,在可预测且资源丰富的环境下进化可能有利于快速获取资源和生长,但这种策略在驯化和改良过程中是否持续进化仍不清楚。在此,我们基于对在相同条件下种植的19种草本作物的野生、地方品种和改良品种进行比较,报告了一项关于生长速率进化的全面研究。我们还研究了潜在的生长组成部分以及作物起源和历史对生长进化的影响。驯化和改良对生长的影响并不一致,也就是说不同作物的生长速率增加、减少或保持不变。以果实为选择目标的作物增加了生长的生理组成部分(净同化率),而叶类和种子类作物在形态方面(叶质量比和比叶面积)表现出更大的驯化效应。此外,气候和系统发育有助于解释驯化的影响和生长的变化。作物对驯化和改良的特异性反应表明,对高产的选择并没有始终如一地改变生长速率。形态生理特征之间的权衡以及作物独特的起源和历史解释了生长变化的变异性。这些发现对我们理解作物性能和适应性具有深远意义。