NSW 144952Agency for Clinical Innovation, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Dec;27(10):631-637. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211046118.
The purpose of this rapid evidence check was to identify virtual care modalities that are safe and effective in the delivery of end of life and palliative care. Thirty-three peer reviewed articles which were either review articles or interventional/evaluative studies presenting comparative data were identified through PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar searches. Extracted data was synthesized narratively and outcomes were categorised separately for patients, healthcare providers, caregivers and health system. Included studies reported on a wide range of virtual care modalities, including video consultation, mobile apps, videos, websites, telephone support, email and alert messages. Generally, studies reported similar or favourable quality of life outcomes to face-to-face palliative care, especially when virtual care was used as a supplement rather than a substitute for face-to-face care. Positive attitudes for perceived usefulness and helpfulness were reported by patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. Challenges identified related to technology limitations, trust, ethical concerns, administrative burden and evidence gaps. Overall, most studies found virtual care modalities to be safe and effective in end of life and palliative care with no detrimental adverse outcomes, when used as a supplement to face-to-face care.
本次快速证据审查的目的是确定在提供临终关怀和姑息治疗方面安全有效的虚拟护理模式。通过在 PubMed、Google 和 Google Scholar 上搜索,共发现了 33 篇同行评审文章,这些文章要么是综述文章,要么是有对照数据的干预/评估研究。通过叙述性综合提取数据,并分别为患者、医疗保健提供者、护理人员和卫生系统对结果进行分类。纳入的研究报告了广泛的虚拟护理模式,包括视频咨询、移动应用程序、视频、网站、电话支持、电子邮件和提醒消息。一般来说,研究报告表明虚拟护理与面对面姑息治疗具有相似或更优的生活质量结果,尤其是当虚拟护理作为面对面护理的补充而非替代时。患者、护理人员和医疗保健提供者报告对感知的有用性和帮助持积极态度。研究中发现的挑战与技术限制、信任、伦理问题、行政负担和证据差距有关。总体而言,当作为面对面护理的补充时,大多数研究发现虚拟护理模式在临终关怀和姑息治疗中是安全有效的,不会产生不利的不良后果。