J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2021 Aug;69(4):715-741. doi: 10.1177/00030651211042377.
refers to an excess enjoyment beyond (yet tied to) speech and representation. From the perspective of some Lacanian analysts, is precisely what testifies against any relationship to the brain- "slips" out of cognition. On the contrary, it is argued here that has a central place in contemporary neuropsychoanalysis. In part 1 of this series the metapsychology of was presented in relation to the real and symbolic registers. Here, in part 2, Mark Solms's neuropsychoanalytic model of Karl Friston's free energy principle is summarized. In this model, "predictions" aim to resolve prediction errors-most notably, those signaled by affective consciousness. "Surplus prediction error"-prediction error that arises at the point where the predictive model fails-is proposed to be a neural correlate of . This limit within prediction is analogous to the real as a structural negativity within the symbolic.
指的是超越（但与言语和表象相关联的）的过度享受。从一些拉康分析师的角度来看，正是这种过度享受证明了与大脑没有任何关系——“滑出”了认知。相反，本文认为在当代神经精神分析中，占据着核心地位。在本系列的第 1 部分中，提出了与现实和象征界相关的的元心理学。在这里，在第 2 部分中，总结了马克·索姆斯（Mark Solms）对卡尔·弗里斯顿（Karl Friston）自由能原理的神经精神分析模型。在这个模型中，“预测”旨在解决预测错误——特别是那些由情感意识发出的信号。“多余的预测误差”——在预测模型失败的地方产生的预测误差——被提议为的神经相关物。这种预测中的限制类似于作为象征界的结构性否定的现实。
