J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2021 Aug;69(4):743-765. doi: 10.1177/00030651211042059.
In parts 1 and 2 of this Lacanian neuropsychoanalytic series, surplus prediction error was presented as a neural correlate of the Lacanian concept of . Affective consciousness (a key source of prediction error in the brain) impels the work of cognition, the predictive work of explaining what is foreign and surprising. Yet this arousal is the necessary bedrock of all consciousness. Although the brain's predictive model strives for homeostatic explanation of prediction error, "drives a hole" in the work of homeostasis. Some residual prediction error always remains. Lacanian clinical technique attends to this surplus and the failed predictions to which this "sticks." Rather than striving to eliminate prediction error, clinical practice seeks its metabolization. Analysis targets one's mode of to create a space for the subject to enjoy in some other way. This entails working prediction error, not removing or tolerating it. Analysis aims to shake the very core of the subject by prediction error-this drives clinical change. Brief clinical examples illustrate this view.
在本拉康神经精神分析系列的第 1 部分和第 2 部分中，超额预测误差被提出作为拉康概念的神经相关物。情感意识（大脑中预测误差的主要来源）推动认知工作，即解释陌生和令人惊讶的事物的预测工作。然而，这种觉醒是所有意识的必要基础。尽管大脑的预测模型努力实现对预测误差的同型解释，但它“在同型的工作中钻了一个洞”。总会有一些剩余的预测误差。拉康的临床技术关注这种剩余和由此产生的失败预测。临床实践不是努力消除预测误差，而是寻求其新陈代谢。分析的目的是关注一个人的模式，为主体创造一个以其他方式享受的空间。这需要处理预测误差，而不是消除或容忍它。分析旨在通过引发预测误差来动摇主体的核心——这推动了临床的变化。简短的临床例子说明了这一观点。
