Suppr超能文献

住院患者光疗的临床结局——一项系统综述

Clinical outcomes of light therapy in hospitalized patients - A systematic review.

作者信息

Lindskov Filippa O, Iversen Helle K, West Anders S

机构信息

Clinical Stroke Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2022 Feb;39(2):299-310. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1993240. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Abstract

Light therapy and the effects on biological function have been known and investigated for decades. Light therapy is used to compensate for the lack of exposure to sunlight, which is thought to be linked to major depressive disorder with seasonal patterns. It is applied as sessions with bright light mimicking natural sunlight. Lack of bright light during daytime is not the only factor to maintain the circadian rhythm, also lack of exposure to bright light at night is important. A new modality called naturalistic light shows promise, mimicking daylight by dynamically changing intensity and wavelengths throughout the day. Evidence of clinical effects, besides bright light effects on depression, is still limited, especially in hospital populations, and present review aims to extract results of the effect of any optical light intervention on hospitalized patients. Through database search, 29 trials were included, of which 8 trials used a variation of naturalistic light. Trials were heterogeneous regarding designs, populations, interventions, methods and outcomes. In 14 out of 17 studies investigating sleep duration, quality and circadian alignment, along with decreased fatigue and improved mood in daytime, light therapy had a significant effect. Circadian rhythm and rhythmicity were affected as well. The effect on mood and cognition was inconsistent across studies. Trials showed more significant outcomes when conducted in non-intensive care units and with duration >5 days. Lux was reported in and compared across 24 studies and did not appear to be correlated to outcome, rather the distribution of wavelengths should be considered when conducting trials in the future. Of the 8 trials investigating naturalistic light, 4 trials had significant outcomes and 3 had adverse outcomes compared to one in the standard light regime. The overall effect of light therapy is beneficial, but evidence for the effect of naturalistic light is still insufficient to be recommended before other modalities. Future research in this area should be conducted in facilities where naturalistic light is installed, with a focus on the spectral distribution.

摘要

光疗法及其对生物功能的影响已为人所知并被研究了数十年。光疗法用于弥补阳光照射不足,而阳光照射不足被认为与季节性模式的重度抑郁症有关。它通过模拟自然阳光的强光疗程来应用。白天缺乏强光并非维持昼夜节律的唯一因素,夜间缺乏强光照射也很重要。一种名为自然主义光的新方法显示出前景,它通过在一天中动态改变强度和波长来模拟日光。除了强光对抑郁症的影响外,临床效果的证据仍然有限,尤其是在医院人群中,本综述旨在提取任何光学光干预对住院患者影响的结果。通过数据库搜索,纳入了29项试验,其中8项试验使用了自然主义光的变体。试验在设计、人群、干预措施、方法和结果方面存在异质性。在17项研究睡眠时长、质量和昼夜节律同步性,以及减少疲劳和改善白天情绪的研究中,有14项研究表明光疗法有显著效果。昼夜节律和节律性也受到了影响。不同研究对情绪和认知的影响并不一致。在非重症监护病房进行且持续时间>5天的试验显示出更显著的结果。24项研究报告并比较了勒克斯,它似乎与结果无关,未来进行试验时应考虑波长分布。在8项研究自然主义光的试验中,与标准光照方案中的一项试验相比,4项试验有显著结果,3项试验有不良结果。光疗法的总体效果是有益的,但自然主义光效果的证据仍然不足,在其他方法之前不建议使用。该领域未来的研究应在安装了自然主义光的设施中进行,重点关注光谱分布。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验