• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在低收入国家进行乳房 X 光筛查的成本效益:马尔可夫模拟分析。

Cost-effectiveness of screening mammography in a low income country: a Markov simulation analysis.

机构信息

College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00696-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12880-021-00696-z
PMID:34727883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8564986/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women. Screening mammography is the only imaging screening study for breast cancer with a proven. mortality benefit. This study aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of screening mammography in Ethiopia.

METHODS

Multistate Markov model was used for computer simulation to estimate cost and health benefits of screening mammography interventions for age-group of 40-49 years and 50-59 years. The cost-effectiveness analysis was made for 4 policies based on where the screening mammography procedures were conducted: government institution only, the private institution only, 50% ratio for each, and 10% private institution policy. Outputs were expressed in total cost, life-years gained (LYG) incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB).

RESULTS

All 4 policies of annual screening mammography failed to achieve acceptable ICER and lead to a net loss in INMB. The lowest ICER value was for government institution-only policy with 3510.3 USD/LYG and 3224.9 USD/LYG both above the cost-effectiveness threshold of 2808.5 USD. The cost per single death averted for each group was 110,206.7 USD and 77,088.2 USD for age-group 40-49 years and 50-59 years respectively.

CONCLUSION

Screening mammography could not be shown to be cost-effective in Ethiopia with the current low cost-effectiveness threshold. Alternative screening approach like annual clinical breast examination may need to be investigated.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是女性最常见的癌症。乳腺 X 线筛查是唯一具有明确降低死亡率获益的乳腺癌影像学筛查研究。本研究旨在分析在埃塞俄比亚进行乳腺 X 线筛查的成本效益。

方法

使用多状态马尔可夫模型进行计算机模拟,以估计 40-49 岁和 50-59 岁年龄组的乳腺 X 线筛查干预的成本和健康效益。基于筛查乳腺 X 线检查的实施地点,针对以下 4 种政策进行成本效益分析:仅政府机构、仅私立机构、各占 50%和 10%私立机构政策。产出以总成本、获得的生命年(LYG)增量成本效益比(ICER)和增量净货币效益(INMB)表示。

结果

所有 4 种年度乳腺 X 线筛查政策都未能达到可接受的 ICER,并导致 INMB 净亏损。政府机构仅政策的最低 ICER 值为 3510.3 美元/LYG 和 3224.9 美元/LYG,均高于 2808.5 美元的成本效益阈值。每组每避免 1 例死亡的成本分别为 110206.7 美元和 77088.2 美元,适用于 40-49 岁和 50-59 岁年龄组。

结论

在埃塞俄比亚,目前的低成本效益阈值下,乳腺 X 线筛查不能被证明是具有成本效益的。可能需要研究替代的筛查方法,如每年的临床乳房检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/1b1cac846322/12880_2021_696_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/21025bd6832e/12880_2021_696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/0929cec50a7c/12880_2021_696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/f8bf94f07092/12880_2021_696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/1b1cac846322/12880_2021_696_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/21025bd6832e/12880_2021_696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/0929cec50a7c/12880_2021_696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/f8bf94f07092/12880_2021_696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/767e/8564986/1b1cac846322/12880_2021_696_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of screening mammography in a low income country: a Markov simulation analysis.在低收入国家进行乳房 X 光筛查的成本效益:马尔可夫模拟分析。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00696-z.
2
Assessment of the Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Urban China: A Model-Based Analysis.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查在中国城市的获益和成本效益评估:基于模型的分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1658-1667. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.62. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
3
The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.数字乳腺断层合成在人群乳腺癌筛查计划中的成本效益。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5437-5445. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06812-x. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.BRCA1/2 基因突变且年龄在 60 岁及以上的女性是否应接受强化乳腺癌筛查?-成本效益分析。
Breast. 2019 Jun;45:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
Risk stratification in breast cancer screening: Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit ratios for low-risk and high-risk women.乳腺癌筛查中的风险分层:低危和高危女性的成本效益和危害-获益比。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;147(11):3059-3067. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33126. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
6
Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.荷兰50岁之前数字乳腺钼靶筛查的成本效益。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;137(8):1990-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29572. Epub 2015 May 8.
7
Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.对于乳腺钼靶检查显示乳房密度高的女性,每年一次与每两年一次乳腺钼靶筛查的成本效益分析。
J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):180-8. doi: 10.1177/0969141314549758. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
8
Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.基于乳腺癌密度和其他风险因素的个体化乳腺 X 光摄影:健康获益和成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):10-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003.
9
Telemammography for breast cancer screening: a cost-effective approach in Argentina.乳腺 X 线摄影术用于乳腺癌筛查:阿根廷的一种具有成本效益的方法。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Jul;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100351.
10
Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study.儿童期癌症胸部放疗后幸存者乳腺癌筛查的临床获益、危害和成本效益:比较建模研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):331-341. doi: 10.7326/M19-3481. Epub 2020 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Training health workers in clinical breast examination for early detection of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries.培训卫生工作者进行临床乳房检查,以在中低收入国家进行早期乳腺癌检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 18;4(4):CD012515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012515.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Delay and Contributing Factors Among Breast Cancer Patients at Two Cancer Referral Centres in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚两个癌症转诊中心乳腺癌患者的就医延迟及相关因素:一项横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Nov 2;13:1391-1401. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S275157. eCollection 2020.
2
Effectiveness of clinical breast examination as a 'stand-alone' screening modality: an overview of systematic reviews.临床乳房检查作为一种“独立”筛查方式的有效性:系统评价概述。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1070. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07521-w.
3
Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT.
从 40 岁开始每年进行乳腺 X 线筛查以降低女性乳腺癌死亡率:英国年龄 RCT 的长期随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(55):1-24. doi: 10.3310/hta24550.
4
Breast cancer survival in sub-Saharan Africa by age, stage at diagnosis and human development index: A population-based registry study.撒哈拉以南非洲的乳腺癌生存状况按年龄、诊断时的分期和人类发展指数划分:一项基于人群的登记研究。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;146(5):1208-1218. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32406. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
5
Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography in Vietnamese women.使用乳腺 X 光摄影术进行乳腺癌筛查的成本效益:越南女性视角。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 26;13(3):e0194996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194996. eCollection 2018.
6
Rising global burden of breast cancer: the case of sub-Saharan Africa (with emphasis on Nigeria) and implications for regional development: a review.全球乳腺癌负担日益加重:撒哈拉以南非洲(以尼日利亚为例)的情况及其对区域发展的影响:综述。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 22;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1345-2.
7
Demographic changes in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and age associated with population-based mammographic screening.基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查相关的乳腺癌发病率、诊断时分期及年龄的人口统计学变化。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;115(5):517-522. doi: 10.1002/jso.24579. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
8
The Japanese Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening.日本乳腺癌筛查指南。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 May;46(5):482-92. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw008. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Thresholds for the cost-effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches.干预措施成本效益的阈值:替代方法
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.138206. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening policies using simulation.使用模拟方法评估乳腺癌筛查政策的成本效益
Breast. 2015 Aug;24(4):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Apr 10.