School of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, P. R. China.
Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Western China Science &Technology Innovation Harbour, Xi'an, 710000, P. R. China.
J Sep Sci. 2022 Jan;45(2):456-467. doi: 10.1002/jssc.202100570. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been studied since the early clinical treatment of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Considering these two chiral drugs are currently in use as the racemate, high-expression angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 cell membrane chromatography was established for investigating the differences of two paired enantiomers binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor. Molecular docking assay and detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped virus entry into angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-HEK293T cells were also conducted for further investigation. Results showed that each single enantiomer could bind well to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, but there were differences between the paired enantiomers and corresponding racemate in frontal analysis. R-Chloroquine showed better angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor binding ability compared to S-chloroquine/chloroquine (racemate). S-Hydroxychloroquine showed better angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor binding ability than R-hydroxychloroquine/hydroxychloroquine. Moreover, each single enantiomer was proved effective compared with the control group; compared with S-chloroquine or the racemate, R-chloroquine showed better inhibitory effects at the same concentration. As for hydroxychloroquine, R-hydroxychloroquine showed better inhibitory effects than S-hydroxychloroquine, but it slightly worse than the racemate. In conclusion, R-chloroquine showed better angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor binding ability and inhibitory effects compared to S-chloroquine/chloroquine (racemate). S-Hydroxychloroquine showed better angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor binding ability than R-hydroxychloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (racemate), while the effect of preventing SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus from entering cells was weaker than R-hydroxychloroquine/hydroxychloroquine (racemate).
氯喹和羟氯喹自 SARS-CoV-2 爆发的早期临床治疗以来就一直受到研究。考虑到这两种手性药物目前作为外消旋体使用,建立了高表达的血管紧张素转换酶 2 细胞膜色谱法,以研究两种对映异构体与血管紧张素转换酶 2 受体结合的差异。还进行了分子对接测定和 SARS-CoV-2 刺突假型病毒进入血管紧张素转换酶 2-HEK293T 细胞的检测,以进一步研究。结果表明,每种单一对映体都可以很好地与血管紧张素转换酶 2 结合,但在正面分析中,配对的对映体和相应的外消旋体之间存在差异。与 S-氯喹/氯喹(外消旋体)相比,R-氯喹显示出更好的血管紧张素转换酶 2 受体结合能力。S-羟氯喹显示出比 R-羟氯喹/羟氯喹更好的血管紧张素转换酶 2 受体结合能力。此外,与对照组相比,每种单一对映体都被证明是有效的;与 S-氯喹或外消旋体相比,R-氯喹在相同浓度下显示出更好的抑制作用。对于羟氯喹,R-羟氯喹的抑制作用优于 S-羟氯喹,但略逊于外消旋体。总之,与 S-氯喹/氯喹(外消旋体)相比,R-氯喹显示出更好的血管紧张素转换酶 2 受体结合能力和抑制作用。S-羟氯喹显示出比 R-羟氯喹/羟氯喹(外消旋体)更好的血管紧张素转换酶 2 受体结合能力,但其阻止 SARS-CoV-2 假病毒进入细胞的效果弱于 R-羟氯喹/羟氯喹(外消旋体)。