Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Nov;62(6):666-671. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210182.
Previously published studies have shown small prostate size, capsular perforation and intraoperative bladder distension are associated with failed trial without a catheter (TWOC) after HoLEP. The study objective was to determine the relationship between MOSES pulse modulation versus standard laser technology and short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC.
The study included 487 patients who underwent HoLEP, using standard holmium laser settings (180 patients) or MOSES pulse modulation (255 patients), between August 2018 and February 2021. Catheter reinsertion defined as reinsertion following failed TWOC within 30 days of surgery. Association of pulse modulation with catheter reinsertion was examined using single and multivariable logistic regression models. Comparisons of pre and intraoperative characteristics between patients treated without and with pulse modulation were made using a Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric characteristics or Fisher's exact test for categorical characteristics.
Short-term catheter reinsertion occurred in 14% (26/180) of the standard laser setting group as compared with 10% (24/252) of the pulse modulation group. There was no statistically significant association with short-term catheter reinsertion in single (unadjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.60; 95% CI, 0.80-2.91; p=0.12) or multivariable analysis adjusting for specimen weight and operative time (adjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68; p=0.25).
In this study, we found no association between post-HoLEP short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC and MOSES pulse modulation. Although MOSES pulse modulation offers several well-documented advantages, catheter reinsertion events appear to be attributable to other factors.
先前的研究表明,前列腺体积小、包膜穿孔和术中膀胱扩张与 HoLEP 后无导尿管试验失败(TWOC)有关。本研究旨在确定 MOSES 脉冲调制与标准激光技术之间的关系,并确定 TWOC 失败后短期内导尿管重新插入与 MOSES 脉冲调制的关系。
该研究纳入了 2018 年 8 月至 2021 年 2 月期间接受 HoLEP 治疗的 487 例患者,其中采用标准钬激光设置(180 例)或 MOSES 脉冲调制(255 例)。术后 30 天内,TWOC 失败后重新插入导尿管定义为重新插入。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型检查脉冲调制与导尿管重新插入的关系。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较数值特征,采用 Fisher 确切检验比较分类特征,比较无脉冲调制和有脉冲调制的患者术前和术中特征。
标准激光组 14%(26/180)的患者在术后短期内需要重新插入导尿管,而脉冲调制组为 10%(24/252)。单变量(未调整的 OR [标准设置与脉冲调制],1.60;95%CI,0.80-2.91;p=0.12)或多变量分析调整标本重量和手术时间(调整后的 OR [标准设置与脉冲调制],1.44;95%CI,0.77-2.68;p=0.25)均无统计学意义。
在这项研究中,我们发现 HoLEP 后 TWOC 失败与 MOSES 脉冲调制之间没有短期导尿管重新插入的关系。尽管 MOSES 脉冲调制具有许多有充分记录的优势,但导尿管重新插入事件似乎归因于其他因素。