• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does MOSES pulse modulation reduce short-term catheter reinsertion following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate?MOSES 脉冲调制是否能降低钬激光前列腺剜除术后短期内的导管再插入率?
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Nov;62(6):666-671. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210182.
2
Factors Predisposing to Catheter Reinsertion Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.前列腺钬激光剜除术后导尿管再插入的相关因素。
Urology. 2020 Apr;138:125-128. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
3
Second-generation MOSES 2.0 versus MOSES 1.0 pulse-modulation technologies for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).第二代 MOSES 2.0 与 MOSES 1.0 脉冲调制技术在钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)中的比较。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 16;42(1):577. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05277-7.
4
Comparison of Newly Optimized Moses Technology Standard Holmium:YAG for Endoscopic Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.比较新优化的 Moses 技术标准钬:YAG 用于前列腺内镜激光剜除术。
J Endourol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1393-1399. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0996. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Utilization of MOSES Modulated Pulse Mode Results in Improved Efficiency in Holmium:YAG Laser Ablation of the Prostate.MOSES 调制脉冲模式的利用可提高钬:YAG 激光前列腺消融的效率。
Urology. 2021 Mar;149:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.024. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
6
MOSES™ Technology vs Non-Moses Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized Controlled Trial From a High-Volume Center.Moses 技术与非 Moses 钬激光前列腺剜除术:来自高容量中心的随机对照试验。
Urology. 2024 Jul;189:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
7
MOSES Technology for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.钬激光前列腺剜除术的摩西技术:一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2021 Jul;206(1):104-108. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001693. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using Moses 2.0 vs non-Moses: a randomised controlled trial.钬激光前列腺剜除术使用摩西 2.0 与非摩西 2.0 的随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2021 May;127(5):553-559. doi: 10.1111/bju.15265. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
9
18 Years of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience.18 年钬激光前列腺剜除术:单中心经验。
J Urol. 2019 Oct;202(4):795-800. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000280. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Comparative Study of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate With MOSES Enabled Pulsed Laser Modulation.钬激光前列腺剜除术与 MOSES 启用脉冲激光调制的比较研究。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.029. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of the Moses effect and its applications in endourology.摩西效应及其在腔内泌尿外科中的应用综述。
Curr Urol. 2024 Dec;18(4):257-264. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000239. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using moses technology and standard HoLEP: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.使用摩西技术的钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)与标准HoLEP的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug 12;81:104280. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104280. eCollection 2022 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Predisposing to Catheter Reinsertion Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.前列腺钬激光剜除术后导尿管再插入的相关因素。
Urology. 2020 Apr;138:125-128. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Comparative Study of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate With MOSES Enabled Pulsed Laser Modulation.钬激光前列腺剜除术与 MOSES 启用脉冲激光调制的比较研究。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.029. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
3
Safety and Effectiveness of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Using a Low-power Laser.低功率钬激光前列腺剜除术的安全性和有效性
Urology. 2017 Dec;110:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.034. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Relationship of postoperative recatheterization and intraoperative bladder distention volume in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生症钬激光剜除术中术后再次导尿与术中膀胱充盈量的关系
Korean J Urol. 2013 Feb;54(2):89-94. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.2.89. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
5
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.钬激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):604-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0505. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
6
Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia.超过 1000 例钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的经验。
J Urol. 2010 Mar;183(3):1105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.034. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
7
Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction.钬激光剜除术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗症状性前列腺梗阻的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2007 Oct;94(10):1201-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5916.
8
Indwelling catheter treatment and health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer in comparison with men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.与良性前列腺增生男性相比,前列腺癌男性的留置导尿管治疗及健康相关生活质量
Scand J Caring Sci. 2002 Sep;16(3):264-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00096.x.
9
Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results.钬激光前列腺剜除术联合机械粉碎术:初步结果
Eur Urol. 1998;33(1):69-72. doi: 10.1159/000019535.
10
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.逻辑回归分析中每个变量事件数的模拟研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3.

MOSES 脉冲调制是否能降低钬激光前列腺剜除术后短期内的导管再插入率?

Does MOSES pulse modulation reduce short-term catheter reinsertion following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Nov;62(6):666-671. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210182.

DOI:10.4111/icu.20210182
PMID:34729966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8566787/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Previously published studies have shown small prostate size, capsular perforation and intraoperative bladder distension are associated with failed trial without a catheter (TWOC) after HoLEP. The study objective was to determine the relationship between MOSES pulse modulation versus standard laser technology and short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 487 patients who underwent HoLEP, using standard holmium laser settings (180 patients) or MOSES pulse modulation (255 patients), between August 2018 and February 2021. Catheter reinsertion defined as reinsertion following failed TWOC within 30 days of surgery. Association of pulse modulation with catheter reinsertion was examined using single and multivariable logistic regression models. Comparisons of pre and intraoperative characteristics between patients treated without and with pulse modulation were made using a Wilcoxon rank sum test for numeric characteristics or Fisher's exact test for categorical characteristics.

RESULTS

Short-term catheter reinsertion occurred in 14% (26/180) of the standard laser setting group as compared with 10% (24/252) of the pulse modulation group. There was no statistically significant association with short-term catheter reinsertion in single (unadjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.60; 95% CI, 0.80-2.91; p=0.12) or multivariable analysis adjusting for specimen weight and operative time (adjusted OR [standard settings vs. pulse modulation], 1.44; 95% CI, 0.77-2.68; p=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found no association between post-HoLEP short-term catheter reinsertion following failed TWOC and MOSES pulse modulation. Although MOSES pulse modulation offers several well-documented advantages, catheter reinsertion events appear to be attributable to other factors.

摘要

目的

先前的研究表明,前列腺体积小、包膜穿孔和术中膀胱扩张与 HoLEP 后无导尿管试验失败(TWOC)有关。本研究旨在确定 MOSES 脉冲调制与标准激光技术之间的关系,并确定 TWOC 失败后短期内导尿管重新插入与 MOSES 脉冲调制的关系。

材料和方法

该研究纳入了 2018 年 8 月至 2021 年 2 月期间接受 HoLEP 治疗的 487 例患者,其中采用标准钬激光设置(180 例)或 MOSES 脉冲调制(255 例)。术后 30 天内,TWOC 失败后重新插入导尿管定义为重新插入。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型检查脉冲调制与导尿管重新插入的关系。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较数值特征,采用 Fisher 确切检验比较分类特征,比较无脉冲调制和有脉冲调制的患者术前和术中特征。

结果

标准激光组 14%(26/180)的患者在术后短期内需要重新插入导尿管,而脉冲调制组为 10%(24/252)。单变量(未调整的 OR [标准设置与脉冲调制],1.60;95%CI,0.80-2.91;p=0.12)或多变量分析调整标本重量和手术时间(调整后的 OR [标准设置与脉冲调制],1.44;95%CI,0.77-2.68;p=0.25)均无统计学意义。

结论

在这项研究中,我们发现 HoLEP 后 TWOC 失败与 MOSES 脉冲调制之间没有短期导尿管重新插入的关系。尽管 MOSES 脉冲调制具有许多有充分记录的优势,但导尿管重新插入事件似乎归因于其他因素。