• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在水、卫生与个人卫生干预措施中对霍乱人道主义应对情况的评估。]

[Assessment of the humanitarian response to cholera in wash interventions.].

作者信息

Benito Sánchez Alicia, Ruiz Zaldíbar Cayetana, Vicario Merino Ángel

机构信息

SAMUR-Protección Civil. Ayuntamiento de Madrid. Madrid. España.

Universidad Camilo José Cela. Facultad de Salud. Madrid. España.

出版信息

Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Nov 4;95:e202111185.

PMID:34732687
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The humanitarian response to a cholera outbreak in a complex international crisis requires guaranteeing minimum conditions so that normalcy can be restored. Basic responses to a cholera outbreak include water and sanitation. The general objective of this systematic review was the analysis of the current evidence that addresses the effectiveness of different WASH measures to control cholera.

METHODS

A review and analysis of the literature available in the main databases (PubMed, WoS and Scopus) and in a specific meta-search engine for humanitarian aid was carried out (reliefweb.int). Based on the establishment of the PICO research question "", the identification of keywords and databases to carry out the searches, as well as a selection process based on the established eligibility criteria: being studies in both English and Spanish where the WASH intervention was clearly defined, studies where health outcomes of cholera were presented, or data related to the function and use of the WASH intervention, was established.

RESULTS

The initial search provided 17,185 documents susceptible of analysis that were screened using the search criteria, up to 22 references that were read in full text and the 11 that were finally analyzed. These were coded based on the measures set out in their protocols, on the interventions carried out in the improvement of water and its supply, the improvement of sanitation, the measures aimed at better hygiene and those that evaluated the complete WASH intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

All the measures offered positive results, their effectiveness was conditioned by the education of the beneficiaries, the simplicity of the activities and the involvement of local actors.

摘要

背景

在复杂的国际危机中对霍乱疫情做出人道主义应对需要确保最低条件,以便恢复正常状态。对霍乱疫情的基本应对措施包括水和环境卫生。本系统评价的总体目标是分析现有证据,以探讨不同的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)措施控制霍乱的有效性。

方法

对主要数据库(PubMed、WoS和Scopus)以及一个专门的人道主义援助元搜索引擎(reliefweb.int)中可用的文献进行了综述和分析。基于“PICO”研究问题的设定、确定用于搜索的关键词和数据库,以及根据既定的纳入标准进行的筛选过程:纳入以英文和西班牙文发表的研究,其中WASH干预措施有明确界定;纳入呈现霍乱健康结局的研究,或与WASH干预措施的功能和使用相关的数据。

结果

初步检索得到17185篇可供分析的文献,根据检索标准进行筛选,最终阅读了22篇全文文献,并对其中11篇进行了最终分析。这些文献根据其方案中规定的措施、在改善水及其供应、改善环境卫生、旨在提高卫生水平的措施以及评估完整WASH干预措施方面所开展的干预措施进行编码。

结论

所有措施均取得了积极成果,其有效性取决于受益人的教育程度、活动的简易程度以及当地行为体的参与情况。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of the humanitarian response to cholera in wash interventions.].[在水、卫生与个人卫生干预措施中对霍乱人道主义应对情况的评估。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Nov 4;95:e202111185.
2
Interventions to improve water, sanitation, and hygiene for preventing soil-transmitted helminth infection.改善水、环境卫生和个人卫生的措施以预防土壤传播性蠕虫感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD012199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012199.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
8
A Quantitative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Oral Cholera Vaccine as a Reactive Measure in Cholera Outbreaks.口服霍乱疫苗作为霍乱疫情应对措施有效性的定量系统评价与荟萃分析
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):2-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007166. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.