• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

华盛顿州立大学苹果育种项目15年选育过程中果实品质改善的趋势

Trends in Fruit Quality Improvement From 15 Years of Selection in the Apple Breeding Program of Washington State University.

作者信息

Teh Soon Li, Kostick Sarah, Brutcher Lisa, Schonberg Bonnie, Barritt Bruce, Evans Kate

机构信息

Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, United States.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 18;12:714325. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.714325. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2021.714325
PMID:34733298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8558556/
Abstract

Washington State University's apple breeding program (WABP) was initiated in 1994 to select new apple cultivars with improved eating quality, appearance, and storability that are suitable for production in the main growing regions of the state. Fruit quality is phenotyped using various instrumental measures, such as penetrometers (texture), titrator (acidity), and refractometer (soluble solids concentration; SSC), as well as sensory assessment. The selection regime of WABP occurs in three sequential phases: phase one (P1)-single, unreplicated seedlings at one site, phase two (P2)-replicated selections at three geographically diverse sites, and phase three (P3)-highly replicated elite selections at one to two grower sites. Most of the data collection of WABP occurs in P2. Knowledge of trends/changes associated with advancing selections is essential for understanding the selection criteria and progress of WABP throughout the changing compositions of advancing and culling selections. For each post-harvest trait, P2 data from harvest years 2005 to 2019 were split across sites, and between selections and reference cultivars (e.g., Cripps Pink, Gala, and Honeycrisp). Means of instrumental crispness (Cn) and inner cortex firmness for the advancing selections increased gradually over this period and were significantly higher than those for cultivars. Means of outer cortex firmness measurements were stable for selections but significantly higher than those for cultivars. The average fruit acidity of selections increased marginally over this period and was higher than that of the cultivars. Meanwhile, the average fruit SSCs of selections and cultivars were statistically indistinguishable. These 15-year trends indicate that WABP has been selecting apples with improved eating quality and storability through increased crispness and inner cortex firmness, respectively.

摘要

华盛顿州立大学的苹果育种项目(WABP)始于1994年,旨在选育食用品质、外观和耐贮性更佳的新苹果品种,这些品种适合在该州主要种植区进行生产。果实品质通过多种仪器测量进行表型分析,如硬度计(质地)、滴定仪(酸度)和折射仪(可溶性固形物浓度;SSC),以及感官评估。WABP的选择过程分为三个连续阶段:第一阶段(P1)——在一个地点种植单一、未重复的实生苗;第二阶段(P2)——在三个地理上不同的地点进行重复选择;第三阶段(P3)——在一到两个种植者地点进行高度重复的优良选择。WABP的大部分数据收集发生在P2阶段。了解与选择进展相关的趋势/变化对于理解WABP在不断变化的入选和淘汰选择组成中的选择标准和进展至关重要。对于每个采后性状,2005年至2019年收获年份的P2数据按地点、选择品种和参考品种(如克里普斯粉红、嘎拉和蜜脆)进行划分。在此期间,入选品种的仪器脆度(Cn)和内皮层硬度平均值逐渐增加,且显著高于品种。外皮层硬度测量平均值在选择品种中保持稳定,但显著高于品种。在此期间,选择品种的平均果实酸度略有增加,且高于品种。同时,选择品种和品种的平均果实SSC在统计学上没有差异。这15年的趋势表明,WABP一直在分别通过提高脆度和内皮层硬度来选育食用品质和耐贮性更佳的苹果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae30/8558556/8c14df30537e/fpls-12-714325-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae30/8558556/2bfeab110b45/fpls-12-714325-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae30/8558556/a4f7e5479b63/fpls-12-714325-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae30/8558556/8c14df30537e/fpls-12-714325-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae30/8558556/2bfeab110b45/fpls-12-714325-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae30/8558556/a4f7e5479b63/fpls-12-714325-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae30/8558556/8c14df30537e/fpls-12-714325-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Fruit Quality Improvement From 15 Years of Selection in the Apple Breeding Program of Washington State University.华盛顿州立大学苹果育种项目15年选育过程中果实品质改善的趋势
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 18;12:714325. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.714325. eCollection 2021.
2
Inter-correlation of apple firmness determinations and development of cross-validated regression models for prediction of sensory attributes from instrumental and compositional analyses.苹果硬度测定值的相互关系及建立交叉验证回归模型,以从仪器分析和成分分析预测感官属性。
Food Res Int. 2018 Apr;106:752-762. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
3
The use of a combination of instrumental methods to assess change in sensory crispness during storage of a "Honeycrisp" apple breeding family.利用仪器方法组合评估“蜜脆”苹果育种家系在贮藏过程中感官酥脆度的变化。
J Texture Stud. 2018 Apr;49(2):228-239. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12325. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
4
Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses.基于感官、仪器和成分分析的苹果质地属性建模与分类
Foods. 2021 Feb 10;10(2):384. doi: 10.3390/foods10020384.
5
A Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) and Chemometric Approach to Improve Apple Fruit Quality Management: A Case Study on the Cultivars "Cripps Pink" and "Braeburn".一种用于改善苹果果实质量管理的近红外光谱(NIRS)与化学计量学方法:以“克里普斯粉红”和“布拉本”品种为例的研究
Molecules. 2015 Jul 24;20(8):13603-19. doi: 10.3390/molecules200813603.
6
Describing Quality and Sensory Attributes of 3 Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars at 3 Ripeness Stages Based on Firmness.基于硬度描述3个芒果(芒果属印度种L.)品种在3个成熟阶段的品质和感官特性。
J Food Sci. 2015 Sep;80(9):S2055-63. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12989. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
7
Role of MdERF3 and MdERF118 natural variations in apple flesh firmness/crispness retainability and development of QTL-based genomics-assisted prediction.MdERF3 和 MdERF118 自然变异在苹果果肉硬度/脆性保持性和基于 QTL 的基因组学辅助预测发展中的作用。
Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 May;19(5):1022-1037. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13527. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Evaluation of the sensory characteristics of strawberry cultivars throughout the harvest season using projective mapping.利用投影映射评估草莓品种在整个收获季节的感官特性。
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Feb;94(3):591-9. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6307. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
9
Performance of an Expert Sensory Panel and Instrumental Measures for Assessing Eating Fruit Quality Attributes in a Pear Breeding Programme.在梨育种计划中,专家感官小组和仪器测量在评估食用水果品质属性方面的表现。
Foods. 2023 Mar 27;12(7):1426. doi: 10.3390/foods12071426.
10
How Do Consumers Perceive Sensory Attributes of Apple?消费者如何感知苹果的感官属性?
Foods. 2021 Nov 2;10(11):2667. doi: 10.3390/foods10112667.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomewide selection for fruit quality traits in apple: breeding insights gained from prediction and postdiction.苹果果实品质性状的全基因组选择:从预测和事后预测中获得的育种见解
Hortic Res. 2023 May 3;10(6):uhad088. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad088. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
A phased, chromosome-scale genome of 'Honeycrisp' apple ().“蜜脆”苹果的阶段性染色体水平基因组()。
GigaByte. 2022 Sep 19;2022:gigabyte69. doi: 10.46471/gigabyte.69. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling and Classification of Apple Textural Attributes Using Sensory, Instrumental and Compositional Analyses.基于感官、仪器和成分分析的苹果质地属性建模与分类
Foods. 2021 Feb 10;10(2):384. doi: 10.3390/foods10020384.
2
Inter-correlation of apple firmness determinations and development of cross-validated regression models for prediction of sensory attributes from instrumental and compositional analyses.苹果硬度测定值的相互关系及建立交叉验证回归模型,以从仪器分析和成分分析预测感官属性。
Food Res Int. 2018 Apr;106:752-762. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
3
Sweet taste in apple: the role of sorbitol, individual sugars, organic acids and volatile compounds.
苹果的甜味:山梨醇、单糖、有机酸和挥发性化合物的作用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7:44950. doi: 10.1038/srep44950.
4
A candidate gene based approach validates Md-PG1 as the main responsible for a QTL impacting fruit texture in apple (Malus x domestica Borkh).候选基因方法验证了 Md-PG1 是主要负责影响苹果果实质地的 QTL 的基因。
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Mar 4;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-37.