• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换功能障碍的经导管解决方案:再次经导管主动脉瓣置换是一种持久的选择吗?

Transcatheter solutions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement dysfunction: is redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement a durable option?

作者信息

Chatfield Andrew G, Cheung Anson, Akodad Mariama, Chuang Anthony, Besola Laura, Sellers Stephanie, Wood David A, Sathananthan Janarthanan, Webb John

机构信息

Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep;10(5):571-584. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-tviv-85.

DOI:10.21037/acs-2021-tviv-85
PMID:34733686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8505912/
Abstract

As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) expands into a younger and lower risk cohort of patients, many important clinical questions are raised, including the one of overall valve durability. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) is a complex clinical issue, of which structural valve deterioration (SVD) is a subcategory. Similar to surgical bioprosthesis, transcatheter heart valves (THVs) can fail over the years however, data on long-term THVs durability is lacking, especially in the lower risk cohort. Surgical explant with open aortic surgery or a second THV, described as redo-TAVR, are feasible options when the first THV fails. However long-term data in these patients is even more limited. Important clinical considerations such as the mechanism(s) of THV dysfunction, the type and timing of the second procedure must be carefully considered. There are also inherently important clinical concerns regarding redo-TAVR, such as coronary access and higher post procedure gradients. In the present keynote lecture, we review the diagnosis of THV dysfunction and transcatheter options available when SVD occurs.

摘要

随着经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)应用于更年轻、风险更低的患者群体,引发了许多重要的临床问题,包括瓣膜整体耐久性问题。生物瓣膜功能障碍(BVD)是一个复杂的临床问题,其中结构性瓣膜退变(SVD)是一个子类别。与外科生物瓣膜类似,经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)多年后可能会失效,然而,缺乏关于THV长期耐久性的数据,尤其是在低风险患者群体中。当第一个THV失效时,采用开放式主动脉手术取出或植入第二个THV(即再次TAVR)是可行的选择。然而,这些患者的长期数据更为有限。必须仔细考虑诸如THV功能障碍的机制、二次手术的类型和时机等重要临床因素。再次TAVR还存在一些本质上重要的临床问题,如冠状动脉通路和术后更高的压力阶差。在本次主题演讲中,我们将回顾THV功能障碍的诊断以及SVD发生时可用的经导管治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter solutions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement dysfunction: is redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement a durable option?经导管主动脉瓣置换功能障碍的经导管解决方案:再次经导管主动脉瓣置换是一种持久的选择吗?
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep;10(5):571-584. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-tviv-85.
2
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣与再次开胸换瓣术治疗退行性生物瓣主动脉瓣的对比:一项比较中期结果的更新荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 1;97(7):1481-1488. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29541. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
3
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术与再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2021 Jul;36(7):2486-2495. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15546. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣中瓣植入。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 28;75(16):1882-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.051.
5
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术与再次主动脉瓣置换术:哪种术式适用于哪种患者?
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Dec;20(12):911-918. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2153118. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(瓣中瓣技术)与再次外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.020.
7
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical or Transcatheter Bioprosthetic Valves: A Comprehensive Review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗外科手术或经导管生物人工瓣膜功能障碍:综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 25;13(5):1297. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051297.
8
Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Comparing Different Transcatheter Heart Valve Designs: An Ex Vivo Bench Study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中瓣中瓣技术及生物瓣瓣叶断裂:不同经导管心脏瓣膜设计的体外对比研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.043.
9
Ten year follow-up of high-risk patients treated during the early experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术早期治疗高危患者的 10 年随访结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):E431-E437. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29124. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Structural Deterioration of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the PARTNER-2 Trial.PARTNER-2 试验中经导管主动脉瓣与外科主动脉瓣生物假体的结构性衰退。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 20;76(16):1830-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.049.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural heart disease review of TAVR in low-risk patients: importance of lifetime management.低风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结构性心脏病综述:终身管理的重要性。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 1;11:1362791. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1362791. eCollection 2024.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the management of aortic insufficiency secondary to left ventricular assist device implantation: a case report.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗左心室辅助装置植入术后继发的主动脉瓣关闭不全:一例报告
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Dec 30;15(12):7130-7139. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1642. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3:主动脉瓣临床研究更新终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Meta-Analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo-surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve.经导管主动脉瓣置入术治疗生物瓣衰败患者与再次开胸主动脉瓣置换术的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2021 May 1;146:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
3
Repeat transcatheter aortic valve implantation and implications for transcatheter heart valve performance: insights from bench testing.重复经导管主动脉瓣植入术及其对经导管心脏瓣膜性能的影响:来自台架测试的见解。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Nov 19;17(10):856-864. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00697.
4
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020 ACC/AHA 瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e35-e71. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
Surgical Explantation of Transcatheter Aortic Bioprostheses: An Analysis From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.经导管主动脉生物假体的外科取出术:来自胸外科医师协会数据库的分析
Circulation. 2020 Dec 8;142(23):2285-2287. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050499. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
6
Coronary Access and TAVR-in-TAVR: Don't Put Off Until Tomorrow What You Can Do Today.冠状动脉通路与经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中的TAVR:今日事今日毕,勿拖至明日。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 9;13(21):2539-2541. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.065.
7
Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement.经导管 Valve-in-Valve 主动脉瓣置换术作为再次外科换瓣手术的替代方法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 4;76(5):489-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.010.
8
Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣中瓣植入。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 28;75(16):1882-1893. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.051.
9
Incidence and feasibility of coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后冠状动脉入路的发生率和可行性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):E535-E541. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28720. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
Long-Term Durability of Transcatheter Heart Valves: Insights From Bench Testing to 25 Years.经导管心脏瓣膜的长期耐久性:从 bench 测试到 25 年的观察结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 27;13(2):235-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.049. Epub 2019 Sep 28.