Animal Skin and Allergy Clinic, 16429 7th Place West, Lynnwood, WA, USA.
Department of Comparative Medicine, Magnuson Health Sciences Building, The University of Washington, Campus Box 357340, Seattle, WA, 98195-7340, USA.
Vet Dermatol. 2022 Apr;33(2):108-e30. doi: 10.1111/vde.13036. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
Cytological examination of the skin is an important diagnostic technique in dermatology for disease diagnosis and monitoring of treatment. Impression smear and tape-strip preparation are gold standard cytological techniques. This study introduces a novel cytological method, slurry preparation, in which debris collected from the skin surface is macerated in warm sterile water and dried on the slide.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To compare organism yield between a novel and two standard cytological collection techniques by evaluating bacteria and Malassezia yeast counts.
Thirty client-owned dogs diagnosed with atopic dermatitis and lesions consistent with pyoderma and/or Malassezia dermatitis.
In a prospective, blinded comparison study, dermatological lesions from each dog were sampled using impression smear, tape-strip and slurry preparation methodologies. Ten random reticle fields per lesion, accounting for a total area of 6.25 × 10 mm (equivalent to ˜5% of a typical ×40 field), were evaluated by light microscopy for each cytological method. Bacterial and Malassezia organisms were measured as counts/sample. The slurry preparation was compared to each of the standard methodologies separately using paired Student's t-tests.
The slurry preparation was demonstrated to be more sensitive than gold standard techniques in detecting bacteria, with mean differences of 12.7 and 13.5 additional bacteria per cytological sample, compared to the impression and tape-strip preparations, respectively. The slurry preparation did not differ significantly in detecting Malassezia organisms compared with impression smear preparation. The tape-strip preparation was demonstrated to be more sensitive than the slurry preparation in the detection of Malassezia organisms, finding a mean difference of 0.22 more organisms per sample.
Slurry preparation presents advantages over the gold standard techniques in the detection of bacteria which can help to manage canine pyoderma more appropriately. Performing a slurry preparation in cases of suspected canine pyoderma could be considered as an alternative to the gold standard techniques.
皮肤细胞学检查是皮肤科疾病诊断和治疗监测的重要诊断技术。印片和胶带制备是细胞学的金标准技术。本研究介绍了一种新的细胞学方法,即浆糊制备,即将从皮肤表面收集的碎屑在温暖的无菌水中捣碎并在载玻片上干燥。
假设/目的:通过评估细菌和马拉色菌酵母菌的数量,比较一种新的和两种标准细胞学采集技术的生物量。
30 只被诊断患有特应性皮炎且病变符合脓皮病和/或马拉色菌性皮炎的患犬。
在一项前瞻性、盲法比较研究中,使用印片、胶带和浆糊制备方法对每只犬的皮肤病灶进行采样。每个病变取 10 个随机视场(代表典型 ×40 视场的 5%),用光学显微镜对每种细胞学方法进行评估。细菌和马拉色菌以每个样本的计数表示。使用配对学生 t 检验将浆糊制备与每种标准方法分别进行比较。
浆糊制备在检测细菌方面比金标准技术更敏感,与印片和胶带制备相比,每个细胞学样本分别多检测到 12.7 和 13.5 个细菌。浆糊制备与印片制备在检测马拉色菌方面无显著差异。与浆糊制备相比,胶带制备在检测马拉色菌方面更敏感,每个样本多检测到 0.22 个生物。
浆糊制备在检测细菌方面优于金标准技术,有助于更合理地治疗犬脓皮病。在疑似犬脓皮病的情况下,浆糊制备可作为金标准技术的替代方法。