• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视心力衰竭患者接受β受体阻滞剂治疗时的心率目标临床证据。

Revisiting the clinical evidence of heart rate target in patients with heart failure treated with beta-blockers.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang-China.

出版信息

Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;25(11):762-773. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.90.

DOI:10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.90
PMID:34734809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8575395/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

On evaluating the guidelines from previous studies, we found no randomized controlled trials on the use of beta-blockers for heart failure (HF) that employed as evidence for heart rate targets of 60 or 70 beats/min. In this study, we aimed to assess the target heart rate in patients with HF treated with beta-blockers.

METHODS

We used the keywords, “heart failure” and “beta-blocker” to search PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane from 1966 to June 2021. Two authors independently reviewed the results of the search strategy and selected all the studies that reported the effect of beta-blockers on all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. We conducted analyses using Review Manager, version 5.0 and Stata version 12.0. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomization, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, and other biases. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to compare the results of fixed effect model with the results of random effect.

RESULTS

No clinical trial supported the optimal heart rate of 60 beats/min. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 0.77 (0.71, 0.83) and 0.86 (0.76, 0.97) in the subgroup with a baseline heart rate >80 beats/min and subgroup with baseline of ≤80 beats/min, respectively. RR and 95% CI were 0.92 (0.82, 1.02) and 0.77 (0.65, 0.92) in 2 subgroups with heart rate controlled ≥70 beats/min and 60–70 beats/min, respectively. Accumulated to MOCHA 1 trial (heart rate controlled 70 beats/min), there was no significant difference in mortality between the experimental group and the control group (RR=0.91, 95% CI 0.82–1.02). Accumulated to SENIORS trial (heart rate controlled 68.8 beats/min), there was a difference in mortality between the experimental and the control groups (RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.99).

CONCLUSION

The main effect of beta-blockers in the treatment of HF is achieved by lowering heart rate. The use of beta-blockers did not benefit in people with HFrEF whose heart rate was 77 beats/min before they started the treatment regimen. In patients with HFrEF, the purpose of beta-blockers is to control the heart rate to 65–70 beats min.

摘要

目的

在评估以往研究的指南时,我们发现没有关于β受体阻滞剂治疗心力衰竭(HF)时使用心率目标为 60 或 70 次/分的随机对照试验作为证据。本研究旨在评估 HF 患者接受β受体阻滞剂治疗时的目标心率。

方法

我们使用关键词“心力衰竭”和“β受体阻滞剂”在 PubMed、Ovid、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中检索 1966 年至 2021 年 6 月的文献。两位作者独立回顾了检索策略的结果,并选择了所有报告β受体阻滞剂对射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者全因死亡率影响的研究。我们使用 Review Manager 版本 5.0 和 Stata 版本 12.0 进行分析。评估了随机分组、分配序列隐藏、盲法、结局数据不完整和其他偏倚的风险。进行敏感性分析以比较固定效应模型和随机效应模型的结果。

结果

没有临床试验支持最佳心率为 60 次/分。基础心率>80 次/分亚组和基础心率≤80 次/分亚组的风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 0.77(0.71,0.83)和 0.86(0.76,0.97)。基础心率控制在≥70 次/分和 60-70 次/分亚组的 RR 和 95%CI 分别为 0.92(0.82,1.02)和 0.77(0.65,0.92)。累积 MOCHA1 试验(心率控制在 70 次/分),实验组与对照组之间的死亡率无显著差异(RR=0.91,95%CI 0.82-1.02)。累积 SENIORS 试验(心率控制在 68.8 次/分),实验组与对照组之间的死亡率有差异(RR=0.90,95%CI 0.82-0.99)。

结论

β受体阻滞剂治疗心力衰竭的主要作用是通过降低心率来实现。在开始治疗方案前心率为 77 次/分的 HFrEF 患者中,β受体阻滞剂的使用没有获益。在 HFrEF 患者中,β受体阻滞剂的目的是将心率控制在 65-70 次/分。

相似文献

1
Revisiting the clinical evidence of heart rate target in patients with heart failure treated with beta-blockers.重新审视心力衰竭患者接受β受体阻滞剂治疗时的心率目标临床证据。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;25(11):762-773. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.90.
2
The role of beta-blockers in the treatment of chronic heart failure.β受体阻滞剂在慢性心力衰竭治疗中的作用。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Apr;32(4):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
3
Should patients with severe heart failure be treated with beta blockers?重度心力衰竭患者应该用β受体阻滞剂治疗吗?
Cleve Clin J Med. 2001 May;68(5):469-70. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.68.5.469.
4
Beta-blockers in heart failure.心力衰竭中的β受体阻滞剂
Br J Clin Pract. 1995 Jan-Feb;49(1):3.
5
Beta-blockers for heart failure: is slowing of heart rate essential?用于治疗心力衰竭的β受体阻滞剂:心率减慢是必不可少的吗?
Eur Heart J. 1999 Apr;20(8):560-1.
6
beta-blockers in heart failure--much more than heart rate reduction.心力衰竭中的β受体阻滞剂——作用远不止降低心率。
J Card Fail. 2002 Dec;8(6):379-80. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2002.130310.
7
Beta-blockers treatment in heart failure with atrial fibrillation--Who should we believe?β受体阻滞剂治疗合并心房颤动的心力衰竭——我们该相信谁?
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:60-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.096. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Prescription of beta-blockers in patients with advanced heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Clinical implications and survival.晚期心力衰竭且左心室射血分数保留患者中β受体阻滞剂的处方。临床意义及生存率
Eur J Heart Fail. 2007 Sep;9(9):962; author reply 962-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
9
[Heart failure studies are transferrable to everyday practice. No fear of beta blockers!].[心力衰竭研究可应用于日常实践。无需惧怕β受体阻滞剂!]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2002 Oct 31;144(44):56.
10
Adding ivabradine to beta-blockers in chronic heart failure: Do not rest without lowering the resting heart rate sufficiently.在慢性心力衰竭患者中,将伊伐布雷定添加到β受体阻滞剂治疗方案中:静息心率未充分降低就不要停歇。
Indian Heart J. 2018 Mar-Apr;70(2):201-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.03.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Ivabradine ameliorates cardiomyopathy progression in a Duchenne muscular dystrophy model rat.伊伐布雷定可改善杜氏肌营养不良症模型大鼠的心肌病进展。
Exp Anim. 2024 May 3;73(2):145-153. doi: 10.1538/expanim.23-0087. Epub 2023 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Beta blockers and chronic heart failure patients: prognostic impact of a dose targeted beta blocker therapy vs. heart rate targeted strategy.β受体阻滞剂与慢性心力衰竭患者:目标剂量β受体阻滞剂治疗与心率目标策略对预后的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Nov;107(11):1040-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1277-4. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Optimization of Heart Failure Treatment: Answers to 10 Pivotal Issues About Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways.2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)心力衰竭治疗优化专家共识决策路径:关于射血分数降低的心力衰竭10个关键问题的解答:美国心脏病学会专家共识决策路径特别工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 16;71(2):201-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.025. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
3
2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America.2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会对2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南的重点更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组及美国心力衰竭学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):776-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗特别工作组。由ESC心力衰竭协会(HFA)特别贡献制定。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.592. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
Optimal Use of Beta-Blockers for Congestive Heart Failure.β受体阻滞剂在充血性心力衰竭中的最佳应用
Circ J. 2016;80(3):565-71. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0101. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Prognostic importance of temporal changes in resting heart rate in heart failure patients: an analysis of the CHARM program.心力衰竭患者静息心率变化的预后意义:CHARM 计划分析。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Mar 14;36(11):669-75. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu401. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
7
Relationship between heart rate and mortality and morbidity in the irbesartan patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function trial (I-Preserve).依贝沙坦心力衰竭且射血分数保留患者试验(I-Preserve)中心率与死亡率和发病率的关系。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jul;16(7):778-87. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.85. Epub 2014 May 23.
8
Differential impacts of achieved heart rate and achieved dose of β-blocker on clinical outcomes in heart failure with and without atrial fibrillation.在伴有和不伴有心房颤动的心力衰竭患者中,所达到的心率和β受体阻滞剂剂量对临床结局的不同影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 May 1;173(2):331-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.050. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
9
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):e240-327. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
10
Admission heart rate and in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure in sinus rhythm and in atrial fibrillation.窦性心律和心房颤动的心力衰竭住院患者的入院心率与住院期间结局。
Am Heart J. 2013 Apr;165(4):567-574.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Feb 16.