• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论表型协方差矩阵中的信息秩亏。

On Information Rank Deficiency in Phenotypic Covariance Matrices.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, One John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25701, USA.

Department of Anatomy, Des Moines University, 3200 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.

出版信息

Syst Biol. 2022 Jun 16;71(4):810-822. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syab088.

DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syab088
PMID:34735008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9203068/
Abstract

This article investigates a form of rank deficiency in phenotypic covariance matrices derived from geometric morphometric data, and its impact on measures of phenotypic integration. We first define a type of rank deficiency based on information theory then demonstrate that this deficiency impairs the performance of phenotypic integration metrics in a model system. Lastly, we propose methods to treat for this information rank deficiency. Our first goal is to establish how the rank of a typical geometric morphometric covariance matrix relates to the information entropy of its eigenvalue spectrum. This requires clear definitions of matrix rank, of which we define three: the full matrix rank (equal to the number of input variables), the mathematical rank (the number of nonzero eigenvalues), and the information rank or "effective rank" (equal to the number of nonredundant eigenvalues). We demonstrate that effective rank deficiency arises from a combination of methodological factors-Generalized Procrustes analysis, use of the correlation matrix, and insufficient sample size-as well as phenotypic covariance. Secondly, we use dire wolf jaws to document how differences in effective rank deficiency bias two metrics used to measure phenotypic integration. The eigenvalue variance characterizes the integration change incorrectly, and the standardized generalized variance lacks the sensitivity needed to detect subtle changes in integration. Both metrics are impacted by the inclusion of many small, but nonzero, eigenvalues arising from a lack of information in the covariance matrix, a problem that usually becomes more pronounced as the number of landmarks increases. We propose a new metric for phenotypic integration that combines the standardized generalized variance with information entropy. This metric is equivalent to the standardized generalized variance but calculated only from those eigenvalues that carry nonredundant information. It is the standardized generalized variance scaled to the effective rank of the eigenvalue spectrum. We demonstrate that this metric successfully detects the shift of integration in our dire wolf sample. Our third goal is to generalize the new metric to compare data sets with different sample sizes and numbers of variables. We develop a standardization for matrix information based on data permutation then demonstrate that Smilodon jaws are more integrated than dire wolf jaws. Finally, we describe how our information entropy-based measure allows phenotypic integration to be compared in dense semilandmark data sets without bias, allowing characterization of the information content of any given shape, a quantity we term "latent dispersion". [Canis dirus; Dire wolf; effective dispersion; effective rank; geometric morphometrics; information entropy; latent dispersion; modularity and integration; phenotypic integration; relative dispersion.].

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/fec68b0efb74/syab088f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/c4cbb4947943/syab088f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/9a8109de3685/syab088f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/cb4902634348/syab088f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/639ed2832970/syab088f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/fec68b0efb74/syab088f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/c4cbb4947943/syab088f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/9a8109de3685/syab088f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/cb4902634348/syab088f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/639ed2832970/syab088f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f8/9203068/fec68b0efb74/syab088f5.jpg
摘要

本文研究了源于几何形态测量数据的表型协方差矩阵中的一种秩缺陷及其对表型整合度量的影响。我们首先基于信息理论定义了一种类型的秩缺陷,然后证明这种缺陷会损害模型系统中表型整合度量的性能。最后,我们提出了处理这种信息秩缺陷的方法。我们的第一个目标是确定典型几何形态测量协方差矩阵的秩与特征值谱信息熵之间的关系。这需要对矩阵秩进行明确的定义,我们定义了三种:全矩阵秩(等于输入变量的数量)、数学秩(非零特征值的数量)和信息秩或“有效秩”(等于非冗余特征值的数量)。我们证明了有效秩缺陷是由方法因素(广义 Procrustes 分析、使用相关矩阵和样本量不足)以及表型协方差共同引起的。其次,我们使用狼獾颌骨来记录有效秩缺陷如何影响两种用于测量表型整合的度量。特征值方差错误地描述了整合变化,标准化广义方差缺乏检测整合细微变化所需的敏感性。这两种度量都受到协方差矩阵中信息不足导致的许多小但非零特征值的影响,随着地标数量的增加,这个问题通常会变得更加明显。我们提出了一种新的表型整合度量,它将标准化广义方差与信息熵结合在一起。该度量与标准化广义方差等效,但仅从具有非冗余信息的特征值中计算得出。它是标准化广义方差按特征值谱的有效秩缩放的结果。我们证明了该度量成功地检测到了我们的狼獾样本中整合的变化。我们的第三个目标是将新度量推广到比较具有不同样本量和变量数量的数据集中。我们基于数据置换开发了一种矩阵信息标准化方法,然后证明剑齿虎的颌骨比狼獾的更具整合性。最后,我们描述了如何使用基于信息熵的度量方法来比较密集的半地标数据集,而不会产生偏差,从而可以对任何给定形状的信息量进行特征描述,我们将其称为“潜在离散度”。[Canis dirus;Dire wolf;有效离散度;有效秩;几何形态测量学;信息熵;潜在离散度;模块性和整合性;表型整合;相对离散度]。

相似文献

1
On Information Rank Deficiency in Phenotypic Covariance Matrices.论表型协方差矩阵中的信息秩亏。
Syst Biol. 2022 Jun 16;71(4):810-822. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syab088.
2
High-Density Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Integration: The Good, the Bad, and the Not-Really-a-Problem.高密度形态计量分析的形状和整合:好的、坏的和不那么成问题的。
Integr Comp Biol. 2019 Sep 1;59(3):669-683. doi: 10.1093/icb/icz120.
3
Statistics of eigenvalue dispersion indices: Quantifying the magnitude of phenotypic integration.特征值离散指数统计:量化表型整合的幅度。
Evolution. 2022 Jan;76(1):4-28. doi: 10.1111/evo.14382. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
4
New insights into the phenotypic covariance structure of the anthropoid cranium.对类人猿颅骨表型协方差结构的新见解。
J Anat. 2014 Dec;225(6):634-58. doi: 10.1111/joa.12246. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
5
Ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known covariance matrix.几何形态测量方法估计已知协方差矩阵的能力。
Syst Biol. 2000 Dec;49(4):686-96. doi: 10.1080/106351500750049770.
6
Perils of parsimony: properties of reduced-rank estimates of genetic covariance matrices.简约法的风险:遗传协方差矩阵降秩估计的性质
Genetics. 2008 Oct;180(2):1153-66. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.090159. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
7
The fossil record of phenotypic integration and modularity: A deep-time perspective on developmental and evolutionary dynamics.表型整合与模块性的化石记录:发育与进化动力学的深度时间视角
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 21;112(16):4891-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403667112.
8
Measuring the magnitude of morphological integration: The effect of differences in morphometric representations and the inclusion of size.衡量形态整合的程度:形态计量学表示差异和包含大小的影响。
Evolution. 2019 Dec;73(12):2518-2528. doi: 10.1111/evo.13864. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
Accounting for Sampling Error in Genetic Eigenvalues Using Random Matrix Theory.使用随机矩阵理论计算遗传特征值中的抽样误差。
Genetics. 2017 Jul;206(3):1271-1284. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.198606. Epub 2017 May 5.
10
Accuracy of Pseudo-Inverse Covariance Learning--A Random Matrix Theory Analysis.伪逆协方差学习的精度——随机矩阵理论分析。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011 Jul;33(7):1470-81. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.186. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental lines of least resistance predict standing genetic covariation but do not constrain plasticity or rapid evolution.发育过程中的最小阻力线预测了静态遗传协方差,但并不限制可塑性或快速进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Sep;292(2054):20251039. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1039. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
2
Macroevolution along developmental lines of least resistance in fly wings.果蝇翅膀沿阻力最小发育路线的宏观进化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr;9(4):639-651. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02639-1. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Developmental bias predicts 60 million years of wing shape evolution.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of integration in the canine skull: an inside view into the relationship of the skull modules of domestic dogs and wolves.犬科动物头骨的整合模式:深入了解家犬和狼头骨模块之间的关系。
Zoology (Jena). 2017 Dec;125:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM.颅骨的表型、遗传和环境形态整合
Evolution. 1982 May;36(3):499-516. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05070.x.
3
ONTOGENY OF INTEGRATED SKULL GROWTH IN THE COTTON RAT SIGMODON FULVIVENTER.
发育偏向预测 6000 万年的翅膀形状演化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 9;120(19):e2211210120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211210120. Epub 2023 May 1.
4
An effect size for comparing the strength of morphological integration across studies.用于比较跨研究形态整合强度的效应量。
Evolution. 2022 Oct;76(10):2244-2259. doi: 10.1111/evo.14595. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
棉鼠(Sigmodon fulviventer)颅骨整体生长的个体发生
Evolution. 1992 Aug;46(4):1164-1180. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00626.x.
4
QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF DEVELOPMENT: GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG AGE-SPECIFIC TRAIT VALUES AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY.发育的数量遗传学:特定年龄性状值之间的遗传相关性与个体发育的进化
Evolution. 1983 Sep;37(5):895-905. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05619.x.
5
How many more? Sample size determination in studies of morphological integration and evolvability.还需要多少?形态整合与进化能力研究中的样本量确定
Methods Ecol Evol. 2017 May;8(5):592-603. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12674. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
6
Integration, Disintegration, and Self-Similarity: Characterizing the Scales of Shape Variation in Landmark Data.整合、解体与自相似性:地标数据中形状变化尺度的特征描述
Evol Biol. 2015;42(4):395-426. doi: 10.1007/s11692-015-9317-8. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
7
The fossil record of phenotypic integration and modularity: A deep-time perspective on developmental and evolutionary dynamics.表型整合与模块性的化石记录:发育与进化动力学的深度时间视角
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 21;112(16):4891-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403667112.
8
The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time.表型整合的宏观进化后果:从发育到漫长时间尺度
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 19;369(1649):20130254. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0254.
9
Evolution in the sabre-tooth cat, Smilodon fatalis, in response to Pleistocene climate change.剑齿虎 Smilodon fatalis 的进化对更新世气候变化的响应。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Apr;27(4):714-23. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12340.
10
Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches.形态的进化与发育:整合定量方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Sep;11(9):623-35. doi: 10.1038/nrg2829. Epub 2010 Aug 10.