T. Denny Sanford School.
Oregon Social Learning Center.
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1095-1105. doi: 10.1037/fam0000923. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
To date, our knowledge of the effects of exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) on children's functioning via parenting have relied on individual approaches, effectively placing parents outside of a relationship context, and greatly neglecting to incorporate fathers. The present study addresses these gaps by utilizing a dyadic model to assess how mothers' and fathers' psychological and physical IPV perpetration in early childhood (age 5 years) predicts both their own and each other's parenting in midchildhood (age 7 years) and, in turn, children's social and scholastic competence in late childhood (ages 11-12 years). Such models reflect the current consensus that bidirectional IPV is the most common pattern among couples. The present study involved 175 children (87 females) of 105 mothers and 102 fathers who were originally in the Oregon Youth Study (OYS, = 206). Simple mediation results suggest maternal involvement in parenting is an important mediational mechanism for the relation between maternal IPV as a perpetrator and victim and childhood competencies. Similarly, father's involvement with parenting served as a mediational mechanism for social competence but only for his own IPV perpetration. Dyadic actor-partner models with maternal and paternal parenting yielded few significant mediational pathways, which is likely partially due to strong shared variance across partners in both IPV and parenting, leaving little unique variance. Overall, results indicated that father's IPV perpetration adds valuable information in explaining child adjustment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
迄今为止,我们对亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 暴露对儿童功能的影响的认识主要依赖于个体方法,这种方法有效地将父母置于关系背景之外,并且极大地忽视了父亲的作用。本研究通过使用对偶模型来解决这些差距,评估母亲和父亲在幼儿期(5 岁)的心理和身体 IPV 实施如何预测他们自己和彼此在中年期(7 岁)的育儿方式,以及儿童在晚期童年期(11-12 岁)的社会和学术能力。这种模型反映了目前的共识,即双向 IPV 是夫妻之间最常见的模式。本研究涉及 175 名儿童(87 名女性)、105 名母亲和 102 名父亲,他们最初是俄勒冈青年研究 (OYS,n = 206) 的参与者。简单的中介结果表明,母亲参与育儿是母亲作为施害者和受害者的 IPV 与儿童能力之间关系的重要中介机制。同样,父亲参与育儿也是社会能力的中介机制,但仅适用于他自己的 IPV 实施。具有母亲和父亲育儿的对偶行动者-伙伴模型产生的中介途径很少,这可能部分是由于在 IPV 和育儿方面,伴侣之间存在很强的共同方差,导致很少有独特的方差。总体而言,结果表明,父亲的 IPV 实施在解释儿童适应方面提供了有价值的信息。