• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

eDNA 捕获了大型海藻林生态系统中的深度分区。

eDNA captures depth partitioning in a kelp forest ecosystem.

机构信息

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0253104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253104. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0253104
PMID:34735443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568143/
Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an increasingly important tool for surveying biodiversity in marine ecosystems. However, the scale of temporal and spatial variability in eDNA signatures, and how this variation may impact eDNA-based marine biodiversity assessments, remains uncertain. To address this question, we systematically examined variation in vertebrate eDNA signatures across depth (0 m to 10 m) and horizontal space (nearshore kelp forest and surf zone) over three successive days in Southern California. Across a broad range of teleost fish and elasmobranchs, results showed significant variation in species richness and community assemblages between surface and depth, reflecting microhabitat depth preferences of common Southern California nearshore rocky reef taxa. Community assemblages between nearshore and surf zone sampling stations at the same depth also differed significantly, consistent with known habitat preferences. Additionally, assemblages also varied across three sampling days, but 69% of habitat preferences remained consistent. Results highlight the sensitivity of eDNA in capturing fine-scale vertical, horizontal, and temporal variation in marine vertebrate communities, demonstrating the ability of eDNA to capture a highly localized snapshot of marine biodiversity in dynamic coastal environments.

摘要

环境 DNA(eDNA)宏条形码技术是一种越来越重要的海洋生态系统生物多样性调查工具。然而,eDNA 特征的时空可变性的规模,以及这种变化如何影响基于 eDNA 的海洋生物多样性评估,仍然不确定。为了解决这个问题,我们在加利福尼亚南部系统地研究了三个连续日中沿深度(0 米至 10 米)和水平空间(近岸巨藻林和冲浪区)的脊椎动物 eDNA 特征的变化。在广泛的硬骨鱼类和软骨鱼类范围内,结果表明,在表面和深度之间,物种丰富度和群落组合存在显著差异,反映了常见的加利福尼亚南部近岸岩石礁类群对微生境深度的偏好。在相同深度的近岸和冲浪区采样站之间的群落组合也存在显著差异,这与已知的栖息地偏好一致。此外,群落也随三个采样日而变化,但 69%的栖息地偏好保持一致。研究结果突出了 eDNA 捕捉海洋脊椎动物群落中细微的垂直、水平和时间变化的敏感性,表明 eDNA 有能力在动态沿海环境中捕捉海洋生物多样性的高度本地化快照。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/ca43bfe92ccb/pone.0253104.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/dbad05230b5f/pone.0253104.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/55bd0a9dd07a/pone.0253104.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/5df3bd26f7fa/pone.0253104.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/ca43bfe92ccb/pone.0253104.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/dbad05230b5f/pone.0253104.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/55bd0a9dd07a/pone.0253104.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/5df3bd26f7fa/pone.0253104.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dadc/8568143/ca43bfe92ccb/pone.0253104.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
eDNA captures depth partitioning in a kelp forest ecosystem.eDNA 捕获了大型海藻林生态系统中的深度分区。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0253104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253104. eCollection 2021.
2
Environmental DNA reveals the fine-grained and hierarchical spatial structure of kelp forest fish communities.环境 DNA 揭示了大型海藻林鱼类群落的精细和层次化的空间结构。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 14;11(1):14439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93859-5.
3
Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA.利用环境DNA评估海带森林生态系统中的脊椎动物生物多样性。
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jan;25(2):527-41. doi: 10.1111/mec.13481. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
4
Effect of environmental DNA sampling resolution in detecting nearshore fish biodiversity compared to capture surveys.环境 DNA 采样分辨率对近岸鱼类生物多样性检测的影响与捕获调查相比。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 14;12:e17967. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17967. eCollection 2024.
5
Short-lived detection of an introduced vertebrate eDNA signal in a nearshore rocky reef environment.近岸多岩石礁环境中引入的脊椎动物 eDNA 信号的短暂检测。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0245314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245314. eCollection 2021.
6
A comparison of biomonitoring methodologies for surf zone fish communities.滩涂鱼类生物监测方法比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0260903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260903. eCollection 2023.
7
Large-scale, multidecade monitoring data from kelp forest ecosystems in California and Oregon (USA).来自美国加利福尼亚州和俄勒冈州海带森林生态系统的大规模、数十年的监测数据。
Ecology. 2022 May;103(5):e3630. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3630. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
8
Cost-effort analysis of Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) and environmental DNA (eDNA) in monitoring marine ecological communities.海下诱捕视频(BRUV)和环境 DNA(eDNA)监测海洋生态群落的成本效益分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Apr 30;12:e17091. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17091. eCollection 2024.
9
Detecting kelp-forest associated metazoan biodiversity with eDNA metabarcoding.利用环境DNA宏条形码技术检测与海带森林相关的后生动物生物多样性。
NPJ Biodivers. 2024 Feb 21;3(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s44185-023-00033-3.
10
Catchment-based sampling of river eDNA integrates terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity of alpine landscapes.基于集水区的河流宏基因组学采样综合了高山景观的陆地和水生生物多样性。
Oecologia. 2023 Aug;202(4):699-713. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05428-4. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-Tool Marine Metabarcoding Bioassessment for Baselining and Monitoring Species and Communities in Kelp Habitats.用于海带栖息地物种和群落基线评估与监测的多工具海洋宏条形码生物评估
Mol Ecol Resour. 2025 Oct;25(7):e70010. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.70010. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
2
Monitoring a keystone species (Alosa pseudoharengus) with environmental effects: A comparison with direct capture and environmental DNA.监测具有环境影响的关键物种(拟西鲱):与直接捕获和环境DNA的比较
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0324385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324385. eCollection 2025.
3
Navigating uncertainty in environmental DNA detection of a nuisance marine macroalga.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental DNA reveals the fine-grained and hierarchical spatial structure of kelp forest fish communities.环境 DNA 揭示了大型海藻林鱼类群落的精细和层次化的空间结构。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 14;11(1):14439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93859-5.
2
Improving metabarcoding taxonomic assignment: A case study of fishes in a large marine ecosystem.改进代谢条码分类学分配:大型海洋生态系统中鱼类的案例研究。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2021 Oct;21(7):2546-2564. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13450. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
Short-lived detection of an introduced vertebrate eDNA signal in a nearshore rocky reef environment.
应对有害海洋大型藻类环境DNA检测中的不确定性
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 4;20(2):e0318414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318414. eCollection 2025.
4
Detecting kelp-forest associated metazoan biodiversity with eDNA metabarcoding.利用环境DNA宏条形码技术检测与海带森林相关的后生动物生物多样性。
NPJ Biodivers. 2024 Feb 21;3(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s44185-023-00033-3.
5
Vertical and horizontal environmental DNA (eDNA) patterns of fish in a shallow and well-mixed North Sea area.浅海且水动力混合良好的北海海域鱼类的垂直和水平环境 DNA(eDNA)分布模式。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 20;14(1):16748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66912-2.
6
Nuclear environmental DNA resolves fine-scale population genetic structure in an aquatic habitat.核环境DNA解析了水生栖息地中的精细尺度种群遗传结构。
iScience. 2023 Dec 7;27(1):108669. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108669. eCollection 2024 Jan 19.
7
Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals distinct fish assemblages supported by seagrass (Zostera marina and Zostera pacifica) beds in different geographic settings in Southern California.环境 DNA 宏条形码分析揭示了在加利福尼亚州南部不同地理位置的海草(Zostera marina 和 Zostera pacifica)床支持的独特鱼类群落。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0286228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286228. eCollection 2023.
8
A comparison of biomonitoring methodologies for surf zone fish communities.滩涂鱼类生物监测方法比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0260903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260903. eCollection 2023.
9
The global depth range of marine fishes and their genetic coverage for environmental DNA metabarcoding.海洋鱼类的全球深度范围及其环境DNA宏条形码分析的遗传覆盖范围。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e9672. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9672. eCollection 2023 Jan.
10
A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.海洋生态系统中使用 eDNA 宏条形码的经理指南。
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 15;10:e14071. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14071. eCollection 2022.
近岸多岩石礁环境中引入的脊椎动物 eDNA 信号的短暂检测。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0245314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245314. eCollection 2021.
4
Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies.理解 PCR 过程,从环境 DNA 研究中得出有意义的结论。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 20;9(1):12133. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48546-x.
5
Correction: The Release Rate of Environmental DNA from Juvenile and Adult Fish.更正:幼鱼和成鱼环境DNA的释放率
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0212145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212145. eCollection 2019.
6
Persistence of environmental DNA in marine systems.海洋系统中环境DNA的持久性。
Commun Biol. 2018 Nov 5;1:185. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0192-6. eCollection 2018.
7
eDNA metabarcoding as a new surveillance approach for coastal Arctic biodiversity.环境DNA宏条形码技术作为北极沿海生物多样性的一种新监测方法。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 13;8(16):7763-7777. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4213. eCollection 2018 Aug.
8
The effect of tides on nearshore environmental DNA.潮汐对近岸环境DNA的影响。
PeerJ. 2018 Mar 19;6:e4521. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4521. eCollection 2018.
9
Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment.利用 eDNA 进行生态系统生物监测:在热带海洋环境中跨越生命之树的代谢组条形码分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 25;7(1):12240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12501-5.
10
Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA.基于海水环境DNA推断的大型鲸鲨聚集群体的种群特征
Nat Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov 21;1(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0004.