• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DIY(自己动手)采样和远程监测模型在 COVID-19 qPCR 检测中的大规模应用。

The use of DIY (Do it yourself) sampling and telemonitoring model for COVID-19 qPCR testing scale up.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.

Mobihealth International Limited, Abuja, Nigeria.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259398. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0259398
PMID:34735503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568151/
Abstract

The first case of COVID-19 in Nigeria was recorded on February 27, 2020, being an imported case by an Italian expatriate, to the country. Since then, there has been steady increase in the number of cases. However, the number of cases in Nigeria is low in comparison to cases reported by other countries with similar large populations, despite the poor health system prevailing in the country. This has been mainly attributed to the low testing capacity in Nigeria among other factors. Therefore, there is a need for innovative ways to increase the number of persons testing for COVID-19. The aim of the study was to pilot a nasopharyngeal swab self-sample collection model that would help increase COVID-19 testing while ensuring minimal person-to-person contact being experienced at the testing center. 216 participants took part in this study which was carried out at the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research between June and July 2020. Amongst the 216 participants, 174 tested negatives for both self-collected samples and samples collected by Professionals, 30 tested positive for both arms, with discrepancies occurring in 6 samples where the self-collected samples were positive while the ones collected by the professionals were negative. The same occurred in another set of 6 samples with the self-collected samples being negative and the professional-collected sample coming out positive, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 96.7%. The results of the interrater analysis are Kappa = 0.800 (95% CI, 0.690 to 0.910) which implies an outstanding agreement between the two COVID-19 sampling methods. Furthermore, since p< 0.001 Kappa (k) coefficient is statistically different from zero, our findings have shown that self-collected samples can be reliable in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

摘要

尼日利亚首例 COVID-19 病例于 2020 年 2 月 27 日记录,为一名意大利侨民输入病例。自那时以来,病例数量稳步增加。然而,与其他人口众多的国家报告的病例相比,尼日利亚的病例数量较低,尽管该国的卫生系统较差。这主要归因于尼日利亚检测能力低等因素。因此,需要创新的方法来增加进行 COVID-19 检测的人数。本研究的目的是试点一种鼻咽拭子自我采样收集模型,该模型将有助于增加 COVID-19 检测数量,同时确保在检测中心尽可能减少人与人之间的接触。2020 年 6 月至 7 月,216 名参与者参加了在尼日利亚医学研究所进行的这项研究。在 216 名参与者中,有 174 名自我采集样本和专业人员采集样本均为阴性,30 名两种采集方法均为阳性,6 份样本出现差异,其中自我采集样本阳性而专业采集样本为阴性。另一组 6 份样本的情况相同,自我采集样本为阴性,专业采集样本为阳性,敏感性为 83.3%,特异性为 96.7%。两次检测结果的 Kappa 值为 0.800(95%置信区间,0.690 至 0.910),表明两种 COVID-19 采样方法之间存在出色的一致性。此外,由于 p<0.001,Kappa(k)系数在统计学上与零不同,我们的研究结果表明,自我采集样本可用于 COVID-19 的诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c3/8568151/1cda7b3fd240/pone.0259398.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c3/8568151/10f74f07e249/pone.0259398.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c3/8568151/1cda7b3fd240/pone.0259398.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c3/8568151/10f74f07e249/pone.0259398.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33c3/8568151/1cda7b3fd240/pone.0259398.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of DIY (Do it yourself) sampling and telemonitoring model for COVID-19 qPCR testing scale up.DIY(自己动手)采样和远程监测模型在 COVID-19 qPCR 检测中的大规模应用。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0259398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259398. eCollection 2021.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
3
Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.自行采集的鼻腔拭子与专业采集的鼻咽拭子用于世界卫生组织清单上的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速诊断检测的头对头性能比较。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Aug;210(4):181-186. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00710-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Excellent option for mass testing during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: painless self-collection and direct RT-qPCR.在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间进行大规模检测的绝佳选择:无痛的自我采集和直接 RT-qPCR。
Virol J. 2021 May 4;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01567-3.
5
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.比较基于 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 的唾液或鼻咽拭子标本在无症状人群中的检测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0006221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00062-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
Saliva sample as a non-invasive specimen for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study.唾液样本作为 2019 年冠状病毒病诊断的非侵入性标本:一项横断面研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):285.e1-285.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Over 90% of clinical swabs used for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics contain sufficient nucleic acid concentrations.超过 90%用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的临床拭子含有足够的核酸浓度。
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):2848-2856. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26706. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Saliva Testing Is Accurate for Early-Stage and Presymptomatic COVID-19.唾液检测可准确诊断早期和症状前 COVID-19。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0008621. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00086-21. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
9
Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Testing Compared with Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.自我采集唾液检测与鼻咽拭子检测在 SARS-CoV-2 检测中的表现比较。
Viruses. 2021 May 12;13(5):895. doi: 10.3390/v13050895.
10
[Evaluation of two COVID-19 antigenic diagnostic tests: and compared to ].[两种新冠病毒抗原诊断检测的评估:与……相比的……和……] (由于原文中具体的检测名称缺失,翻译可能不够完整准确)
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Aug 6;39:228. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.228.30752. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
2
Test performance of lateral flow rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 in Welsh adult care home staff using routine surveillance data.利用常规监测数据测试侧向流动快速抗原检测在威尔士成人护理院工作人员中 COVID-19 的检测性能。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0290406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290406. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Service Diagnosis of COVID-19-Ready for Prime Time?新冠病毒病的自助诊断——已准备好迎接黄金时代了吗?
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 Mar 2;1(3):e200333. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0333.
2
Factors Influencing Risk for COVID-19 Exposure Among Young Adults Aged 18-23 Years - Winnebago County, Wisconsin, March-July 2020.影响 18-23 岁年轻人感染 COVID-19 风险的因素-威斯康星州温尼贝戈县,2020 年 3 月至 7 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 16;69(41):1497-1502. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6941e2.
3
Comparison of Patient-collected and Lab Technician-collected Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of COVID-19 by RT-PCR.
患者自行采集与实验室技术人员采集的鼻咽拭子和口咽拭子用于通过逆转录聚合酶链反应检测新冠病毒的比较
Iran J Pathol. 2020 Fall;15(4):313-319. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2020.127312.2387. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎的实验室诊断。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2021 Jan-Feb;97(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
Coronavirus: Why Men are More Vulnerable to Covid-19 Than Women?冠状病毒:为何男性比女性更容易感染新冠病毒?
SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(7):874-876. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00341-w. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
6
Comparison of Unsupervised Home Self-collected Midnasal Swabs With Clinician-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.居家自采中鼻甲拭子与临床医生采集鼻咽拭子用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016382. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16382.
7
Could attitudes toward COVID-19 in Spain render men more vulnerable than women?西班牙人对 COVID-19 的态度是否使男性比女性更易感染?
Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1278-1291. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1791212. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
8
Besides the climate model, other variables driving the COVID-19 spread in Brazil.除了气候模型外,其他变量也在推动新冠病毒在巴西的传播。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 1;737:140211. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140211. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Global, regional, and national estimates of the population at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to underlying health conditions in 2020: a modelling study.2020 年,由于潜在健康状况,全球、区域和国家估计有多少人面临 COVID-19 重症风险增加:一项建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e1003-e1017. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30264-3. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
10
Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area.在纽约市地区,5700 名因 COVID-19 住院的患者的特征、合并症和结局。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775.