• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

60岁以下冠心病患者血管重建和药物治疗后的死亡概率:一项荟萃分析研究。

Mortality probabilities after revascularization and medical therapy in CAD patients under 60 years old: a meta-analysis study.

作者信息

Afrouzi Mohammad, Azar Farbod Ebadi Fard, Aboutorabi Ali, Hajahmadi Marjan, Ebadi Seyed Javad

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health Promotion Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Egypt Heart J. 2021 Nov 4;73(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00225-x.

DOI:10.1186/s43044-021-00225-x
PMID:34735671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568744/
Abstract

To estimate death probabilities after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and medical therapy (MT) in patients under 60 years old. We conducted a search systematic on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to January 2021. The study included three parts. In the probabilities part (A), Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, and in the comparison parts (B and C), Review Manager was used in conducting meta-analyses. Nine studies consisting of 16,410 people with a mean age of 51.2 ± 6 years were included in the meta-analysis. Over a mean follow-up of 3.7 ± 2 years, overall mortality after CABG, PCI and MT was 3.6% (95% CI 0.021-0.061), 4.3% (95% CI 0.023-0.080) and 9.7% (95% CI 0.036-0.235), respectively. The length of follow-up periods was almost the same and did not differ much (p = 0.19). In Part B (without adjustment of baseline characteristics), 495 (4.0%) of 12,198 patients assigned to CABG died compared with 748 (4.5%) of 16,458 patients assigned to PCI (risk ratio [RR]: 0.77, 95% CI 0.50-1.20; p = 0.25). Seventy-four (3.5%) of 2120 patients assigned to CABG and 68 (4.2%) of 1621 patients assigned to PCI died compared with 103 (9.5%) of 1093 patients assigned to MT in equal follow-up periods (CABG-MT: RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.23-0.51; p < 0.002) (PCI-MT: RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.30-0.53; p = 0.02). In Part C, overall mortality after PCI in PACD patients with STEMI was higher in elderly versus young (RR 2.64; 95% CI 2.11-3.30) and is lower in men versus women (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.83). Mortality probabilities obtained are one of the most important factors of effectiveness in the economic evaluation studies; these rates can be used to determine the cost-effectiveness of procedures in CAD patients aged < 60 years.

摘要

为了评估60岁以下患者接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和药物治疗(MT)后的死亡概率。我们截至2021年1月在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和科学网进行了系统检索。该研究包括三个部分。在概率部分(A),使用综合荟萃分析,在比较部分(B和C),使用Review Manager进行荟萃分析。荟萃分析纳入了9项研究,共16410人,平均年龄为51.2±6岁。在平均3.7±2年的随访期内,CABG、PCI和MT后的总体死亡率分别为3.6%(95%CI 0.021 - 0.061)、4.3%(95%CI 0.023 - 0.080)和9.7%(95%CI 0.036 - 0.235)。随访期长度几乎相同,差异不大(p = 0.19)。在B部分(未调整基线特征),分配接受CABG的12198例患者中有495例(4.0%)死亡,而分配接受PCI的16458例患者中有748例(4.5%)死亡(风险比[RR]:0.77,95%CI 0.50 - 1.20;p = 0.25)。在相等的随访期内,分配接受CABG的2120例患者中有74例(3.5%)死亡,分配接受PCI的1621例患者中有68例(4.2%)死亡,而分配接受MT的1093例患者中有103例(9.5%)死亡(CABG - MT:RR 0.34;95%CI 0.23 - 0.51;p < 0.002)(PCI - MT:RR 0.40;95%CI 0.30 - 0.53;p = 0.02)。在C部分,老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的PACD患者接受PCI后的总体死亡率高于年轻患者(RR 2.64;95%CI 2.11 - 3.30),男性低于女性(RR 0.61;95%CI 0.44 - 0.83)。获得的死亡概率是经济评估研究中有效性的最重要因素之一;这些比率可用于确定60岁以下CAD患者手术的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/d54796ceade7/43044_2021_225_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/9c64f6315f76/43044_2021_225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/935af1156645/43044_2021_225_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/0398d2e4a6af/43044_2021_225_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/0e7b4b8e8f84/43044_2021_225_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/0b16b4175c7e/43044_2021_225_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/3329e12666f3/43044_2021_225_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/1015dd2bac06/43044_2021_225_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/2d0ed848e051/43044_2021_225_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/12c86a35830d/43044_2021_225_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/d54796ceade7/43044_2021_225_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/9c64f6315f76/43044_2021_225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/935af1156645/43044_2021_225_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/0398d2e4a6af/43044_2021_225_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/0e7b4b8e8f84/43044_2021_225_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/0b16b4175c7e/43044_2021_225_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/3329e12666f3/43044_2021_225_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/1015dd2bac06/43044_2021_225_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/2d0ed848e051/43044_2021_225_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/12c86a35830d/43044_2021_225_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8a2/8568744/d54796ceade7/43044_2021_225_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mortality probabilities after revascularization and medical therapy in CAD patients under 60 years old: a meta-analysis study.60岁以下冠心病患者血管重建和药物治疗后的死亡概率:一项荟萃分析研究。
Egypt Heart J. 2021 Nov 4;73(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00225-x.
2
3
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Cumulative meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠心病合并 2 型糖尿病患者的荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):899-906. doi: 10.1002/clc.23613. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
5
[Efficacy comparison of 3 strategies for real-world stable coronary artery disease patients with three-vessel disease].[三种策略对真实世界中三支血管病变稳定型冠心病患者的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1049-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.009.
6
Ten-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Suffering from Left Main Coronary Disease: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗2型糖尿病合并左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的十年结局:一项荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Apr;12(4):1041-1054. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01025-x. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies.多支血管病变患者完全血运重建与不完全血运重建的结局比较:随机临床试验和观察性研究中 89883 例患者的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):1421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
8
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
9
Revascularization vs. Conservative Medical Treatment in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.慢性肾脏病合并冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建与保守药物治疗:一项荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 7;8:818958. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.818958. eCollection 2021.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Therapy, Percutaneous Revascularization, and Surgical Coronary Revascularization in Cardiovascular Risk Subgroups of Patients With CKD: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.在患有 CKD 的心血管风险亚组患者中,药物治疗、经皮血运重建和冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较效果:医疗保险受益人的回顾性队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Oct;74(4):463-473. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Fibrosis score 4 index has an independent relationship with coronary artery diseases in patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.纤维化评分4指数与代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者的冠状动脉疾病存在独立关系。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Mar 25;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01031-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials.他汀类药物治疗老年人的疗效和安全性:28 项随机对照试验个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):407-415. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31942-1.
2
Sex-Related Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcome among Young and Middle-Aged Patients for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.性别对中青年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗短期和长期结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Jun 20;131(12):1420-1429. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.233965.
3
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design.
国际比较医疗与介入治疗缺血效果研究(ISCHEMIA)试验:原理与设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Comparison of Long-term Outcomes in Patients with Premature Triple-vessel Coronary Disease Undergoing Three Different Treatment Strategies: A Prospective Cohort Study.不同治疗策略对早发三支血管病变患者长期预后影响的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Jan 5;131(1):1-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.221273.
5
Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Aged 18-45 Years with Diabetes Mellitus.18-45 岁糖尿病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Dec 20;130(24):2906-2915. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.220305.
6
Ten-Year Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting According to Age in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: An Analysis of the Extended Follow-Up of the STICH Trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure).心力衰竭和左心室收缩功能障碍患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后十年结局按年龄分组:STICH试验(缺血性心力衰竭的外科治疗)长期随访分析
Circulation. 2016 Nov 1;134(18):1314-1324. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024800. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Outcome after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Depends on Age in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease - An Analysis of Relative Survival in a Multicenter Cohort and an OCT Substudy.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局取决于稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的年龄——一项多中心队列相对生存分析及光学相干断层扫描亚研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154025. eCollection 2016.
8
Midterm Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Young Patients: A Multicenter Italian Study.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1689-96. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.060. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
9
Atypical risk factor profile and excellent long-term outcomes of young patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的年轻患者的非典型危险因素特征及出色的长期预后
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016 Feb;5(1):23-32. doi: 10.1177/2048872614567453. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
10
Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.糖尿病患者的冠状动脉血运重建:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 18;161(10):724-32. doi: 10.7326/M14-0808.