• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过多学科协作和工作流程优化缩短门到针时间。

Shortening Door-to-Needle Time by Multidisciplinary Collaboration and Workflow Optimization During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Advanced National Stroke Center, Foshan Sanshui District People's Hospital, No. 16, Guanghaidadaoxi, Sanshui District, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528100, China.

Thanh N. Nguyen Department of Neurology, Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jan;31(1):106179. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106179. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106179
PMID:34735901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8526426/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate shortening door-to-needle time of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator of acute ischemic stroke patients by multidisciplinary collaboration and workflow optimization based on our hospital resources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included patients undergoing thrombolysis with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator from January 1, 2018, to September 30, 2020. Patients were divided into pre- (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019) and post-intervention groups (January 1, 2020, to September 31, 2020). We conducted multi-department collaboration and process optimization by implementing 16 different measures in prehospital, in-hospital, and post-acute feedback stages for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. A comparison of outcomes between both groups was analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-three patients received intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in our hospital during the study period, with 128 and 135 patients receiving treatment in the pre-intervention and post-intervention groups, respectively. The median (interquartile range) door-to-needle time decreased significantly from 57.0 (45.3-77.8) min to 37.0 (29.0-49.0) min. Door-to-needle time was shortened to 32 min in the post-intervention period in the 3rd quarter of 2020. The door-to-needle times at the metrics of ≤ 30 min, ≤ 45 min, ≤ 60 min improved considerably, and the DNT> 60 min metric exhibited a significant reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary collaboration and continuous process optimization can result in overall shortened door-to-needle despite the challenges incurred by the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过多学科合作和基于医院资源的工作流程优化,缩短急性缺血性脑卒中患者接受静脉重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗的门到针时间。

材料与方法

我们纳入了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 30 日期间接受静脉重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂溶栓治疗的患者。患者分为干预前组(2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日)和干预后组(2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 31 日)。我们通过在急性缺血性脑卒中患者接受静脉溶栓治疗的院前、院内和急性后反馈阶段实施 16 项不同措施,开展多部门合作和流程优化。分析两组患者的结局。

结果

在研究期间,我院共有 263 例患者接受静脉重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗,干预前组和干预后组分别有 128 例和 135 例患者接受治疗。门到针时间中位数(四分位距)从 57.0(45.3-77.8)min 显著缩短至 37.0(29.0-49.0)min。2020 年第 3 季度,干预后组的门到针时间缩短至 32min。≤30min、≤45min、≤60min 时间的门到针时间明显改善,而 DNT>60min 时间显著减少。

结论

尽管受到 COVID-19 大流行的挑战,但通过多学科合作和持续的流程优化,可以实现总体缩短门到针时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3315/8526426/9dd13889ddb6/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3315/8526426/2ae4f133a40f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3315/8526426/11bf0c1fb2aa/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3315/8526426/9dd13889ddb6/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3315/8526426/2ae4f133a40f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3315/8526426/11bf0c1fb2aa/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3315/8526426/9dd13889ddb6/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Shortening Door-to-Needle Time by Multidisciplinary Collaboration and Workflow Optimization During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过多学科协作和工作流程优化缩短门到针时间。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jan;31(1):106179. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106179. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke during two COVID-19 outbreaks in China: Wuhan pandemic and Beijing pandemic.中国两次 COVID-19 疫情期间的急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗:武汉大流行和北京大流行。
BMC Neurol. 2023 May 25;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03211-9.
3
Impact of a code stroke protocol on the door-to-needle time for IV thrombolysis: a feasibility study.卒中急救流程对静脉溶栓门针时间的影响:一项可行性研究。
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Aug;75(4):267-274. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2019.1607991. Epub 2019 May 11.
4
Improvement in Door-to-Needle Time in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke via a Simple Stroke Activation Protocol.通过简单的卒中激活方案改善急性缺血性卒中患者的门-针时间。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jun;27(6):1539-1545. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Door-to-needle time for thrombolysis: a secondary analysis of the TIPS cluster randomised controlled trial.溶栓治疗的门到针时间:TIPS 集群随机对照试验的二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e032482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032482.
6
Temporal Trends in Clinical Characteristics and Door-to-Needle Time in Patients Receiving Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator: A Retrospective Study of 4 Hospitals in Japan.静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗患者的临床特征和从进入医院到开始溶栓时间的时间趋势:日本 4 家医院的回顾性研究。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Nov;28(11):104305. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104305. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
7
Impact of the extended thrombolysis time window on the proportion of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator-treated stroke patients and on door-to-needle time.溶栓时间窗延长对重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗的脑卒中患者比例及门到针时间的影响。
Stroke. 2011 Oct;42(10):2838-43. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.616565. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
8
Regional Learning Collaboratives Produce Rapid and Sustainable Improvements in Stroke Thrombolysis Times.区域学习协作组在卒中溶栓时间方面实现了快速且可持续的改善。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Sep;9(5):585-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003222. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
The effects of the coronavirus disease pandemic on intravenous thrombolytic therapy among patients with acute ischemic stroke in Dalian, China.冠状病毒病大流行对中国大连急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓治疗的影响。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03053-5.
10
Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: do patients treated out of hours have a worse outcome?急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗:非工作时间接受治疗的患者预后更差吗?
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Mar;23(3):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.03.029. Epub 2013 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of muscle strength improvement in 24 hours to predict ischemic stroke patients' outcome after endovascular therapy: A retrospective cohort study.24小时内肌肉力量改善情况预测缺血性脑卒中患者血管内治疗后预后的研究进展及验证:一项回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42055. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042055.
2
Ultrasound Evaluation for Shortening the Door-to-Puncture Time During Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vessel Occlusion.超声评估在颅内血管闭塞血管内治疗中缩短门到穿刺时间的作用
Cureus. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):e83093. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83093. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Delays in thrombolysis during COVID-19 are associated with worse neurological outcomes: the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Multicenter Collaboration.COVID-19 期间溶栓治疗的延迟与更差的神经学结局相关:血管和介入神经病学学会多中心协作。
J Neurol. 2022 Feb;269(2):603-608. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10734-z. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
2
Decline in subarachnoid haemorrhage volumes associated with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.与 COVID-19 大流行第一波相关的蛛网膜下腔出血量下降。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Dec;6(4):542-552. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000695. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Global Impact of COVID-19 on Stroke Care and IV Thrombolysis.
Association Between Sociodemographic Disparities and Door to Computerized Tomography Time in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Across COVID-19 Periods in the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center Cohort Study.
急诊科在新冠疫情期间急性缺血性卒中患者的社会人口学差异与计算机断层扫描检查时间之间的关联:一项多中心队列研究
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 15;13(1):31. doi: 10.3390/medsci13010031.
4
Impact of in-hospital COVID-19 quarantine policy changes on quality of acute stroke care: a single center experience.医院内新型冠状病毒肺炎隔离政策变化对急性卒中护理质量的影响:单中心经验
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1488529. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1488529. eCollection 2024.
5
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care in a tertiary stroke centre.2019冠状病毒病大流行对三级卒中中心急性卒中治疗的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83016-z.
6
The Impact of Pandemic-Driven Care Redesign on Hospital Efficiency.疫情驱动的护理重新设计对医院效率的影响。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jun 4;17:1477-1491. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S465167. eCollection 2024.
7
Application of multidisciplinary simulation training in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a quality improvement project.多学科模拟训练在急性缺血性脑卒中治疗中的应用:一项质量改进项目。
World J Emerg Med. 2024;15(1):41-46. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.084.
8
Post-ASPECTS and Post-PC-ASPECTS Predict the Outcome of Anterior and Posterior Ischemic Stroke Following Thrombectomy.ASPECTS评分后及PC-ASPECTS评分后可预测血栓切除术治疗前后循环缺血性卒中的预后。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Dec 16;16:2757-2769. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S436661. eCollection 2023.
9
Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: a multi-center study.急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗后无效再通的预测因素:一项多中心研究。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Nov 28;17:1279366. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1279366. eCollection 2023.
10
Impact of Thrombolysis Time Metrics When Participating in National Stroke Center Construction Project.参与国家卒中中心建设项目时溶栓时间指标的影响
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Nov 7;16:3333-3338. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S432458. eCollection 2023.
COVID-19 对卒中护理和静脉溶栓的全球影响。
Neurology. 2021 Jun 8;96(23):e2824-e2838. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011885. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Global impact of COVID-19 on stroke care.全球范围内 COVID-19 对卒中护理的影响。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Jul;16(5):573-584. doi: 10.1177/1747493021991652. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
5
Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke during COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.中国武汉新冠疫情期间急性缺血性卒中的静脉溶栓治疗:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;92(2):226-228. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-324014. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Response by Nguyen et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Emergency Preparedness for Neuroscience Teams: A Guidance Statement From the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology".阮等人对关于文章《COVID-19大流行时代的机械血栓切除术:神经科学团队的应急准备:血管与介入神经病学学会的指导声明》的信件的回应
Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):e172-e173. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030629. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on stroke admission rates in a Norwegian population.COVID-19 大流行对挪威人群中风入院率的影响。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Dec;142(6):632-636. doi: 10.1111/ane.13307. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
8
Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic on Stroke Care and Potential Solutions.COVID-19 疫情对卒中护理的影响及潜在解决方案。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):1996-2001. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030225. Epub 2020 May 20.
9
Stroke prevention and control system in China: CSPPC-Stroke Program.中国脑卒中预防与控制系统:CSPPC-卒中项目。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Apr;16(3):265-272. doi: 10.1177/1747493020913557. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
10
Thrombolysis: Improving door-to-needle times for ischemic stroke treatment - A narrative review.溶栓治疗:改善缺血性脑卒中治疗的门到针时间 - 叙述性综述。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):268-276. doi: 10.1177/1747493017743060. Epub 2017 Nov 15.