• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为干预促进青少年计划生育参与:一项随机对照试验,乌干达。

Behavioural intervention for adolescent uptake of family planning: a randomized controlled trial, Uganda.

机构信息

ideas42, 80 Broad St 30Fl, New York, NY 10004, United States of America (USA).

MSI Reproductive Choices, London, England.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Nov 1;99(11):795-804. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.285339. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.20.285339
PMID:34737472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8542266/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a peer-referral and clinic welcome programme for reducing barriers to adolescents' uptake of family planning services in Uganda.

METHODS

We developed an intervention using behavioural design and carried out a stratified, randomized controlled evaluation of the intervention in girls aged 15-19 years. Sexual and reproductive health clinics were randomized into control (56 clinics) and intervention groups (60 clinics). All intervention clinics received the core intervention (materials to create an adolescent-friendly environment and referral cards to give to friends), while a subset of clinics additionally received training in youth-friendly service provision. We collected clinics' routine data on monthly numbers of visits by adults and adolescents over a 15-month baseline and 6-month intervention period, 2018-2020.

FINDINGS

In multivariate regression analysis we found significant effects of the intervention on primary outcomes in the pooled intervention group compared with control. Mean monthly visits by adolescents increased by 45% (incidence rate ratio, IRR: 1.45; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.14-1.85), or over five additional adolescent clients per clinic per month. The mean adolescent proportion of total clients improved by 5.3 percentage points (95% CI: 0.02-0.09). Within treatment arms, clinics receiving the training in youth-friendly service provision showed the strongest effects: a 62% increase (IRR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.21-2.17) in adolescent clients, or over seven additional adolescents per clinic per month, relative to the control group.

CONCLUSION

A behavioural change intervention designed to target identified barriers can increase adolescents' uptake of family planning counselling and services.

摘要

目的

评估同伴推荐和诊所欢迎计划对减少乌干达青少年获得计划生育服务障碍的影响。

方法

我们使用行为设计开发了一项干预措施,并对 15-19 岁女孩进行了分层随机对照评估。性健康和生殖健康诊所被随机分为对照组(56 家诊所)和干预组(60 家诊所)。所有干预诊所都收到了核心干预措施(创建青少年友好环境的材料和推荐给朋友的转诊卡),而部分诊所还接受了青年友好服务提供方面的培训。我们收集了诊所 15 个月基线和 6 个月干预期间每月成年和青少年就诊次数的常规数据,时间为 2018-2020 年。

发现

在多变量回归分析中,我们发现与对照组相比,干预组在汇总干预组中的主要结果有显著影响。青少年每月就诊次数增加了 45%(发病率比,IRR:1.45;95%置信区间,CI:1.14-1.85),即每个诊所每月增加了 5 名以上的青少年患者。青少年在总就诊者中的平均比例提高了 5.3 个百分点(95%CI:0.02-0.09)。在治疗组内,接受青年友好服务提供培训的诊所显示出最强的效果:青少年就诊者增加了 62%(IRR:1.62;95%CI:1.21-2.17),即每个诊所每月增加了 7 名以上的青少年患者,与对照组相比。

结论

一项旨在针对已确定障碍的行为改变干预措施可以增加青少年对计划生育咨询和服务的接受度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb2/8542266/fb3c9e013690/BLT.20.285339-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb2/8542266/fb3c9e013690/BLT.20.285339-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb2/8542266/fb3c9e013690/BLT.20.285339-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Behavioural intervention for adolescent uptake of family planning: a randomized controlled trial, Uganda.行为干预促进青少年计划生育参与:一项随机对照试验,乌干达。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Nov 1;99(11):795-804. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.285339. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Greater involvement of HIV-infected peer-mothers in provision of reproductive health services as "family planning champions" increases referrals and uptake of family planning among HIV-infected mothers.让感染艾滋病毒的同龄母亲更多地作为“计划生育倡导者”参与提供生殖健康服务,可增加感染艾滋病毒母亲的计划生育转诊和接受率。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2386-x.
3
Contraceptive services for teenagers: do we need family planning clinics?青少年避孕服务:我们需要计划生育诊所吗?
BMJ. 1995 Jun 24;310(6995):1641-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6995.1641.
4
Evaluating the impact of a quality management intervention on post-abortion contraceptive uptake in private sector clinics in western Kenya: a pre- and post-intervention study.评价质量管理干预对肯尼亚西部私营部门诊所流产后避孕措施使用的影响:一项干预前后研究。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 19;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0452-4.
5
First family planning visits by young women.年轻女性的首次计划生育就诊。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1988 Jan-Feb;20(1):33-40.
6
Traditional healer-delivered point-of-care HIV testing versus referral to clinical facilities for adults of unknown serostatus in rural Uganda: a mixed-methods, cluster-randomised trial.传统治疗师提供的即时检测与转介到临床机构对乌干达农村地区未知血清学状态成年人进行 HIV 检测:一项混合方法、整群随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Nov;9(11):e1579-e1588. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00366-1.
7
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
8
A couple-focused, integrated unplanned pregnancy and HIV prevention program in urban and rural Zambia.赞比亚城乡夫妇为中心的综合非意愿妊娠和艾滋病毒预防项目。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S915.e1-S915.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Evaluating the effectiveness of enhanced family planning education on knowledge and use of family planning in fishing communities of Lake Victoria in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial.评价强化计划生育教育对乌干达维多利亚湖渔业社区计划生育知识和使用的效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 14;22(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07898-3.
10
Dual provision or duplication? A survey of family planning provision.双重提供还是重复?计划生育服务调查。
Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):41-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of social networks in motivating access and use of contraceptives among adolescent girls and young women living in resource-constrained settings in Cape Town, South Africa.社交网络在激励南非开普敦资源匮乏地区的少女和年轻女性获取及使用避孕药具方面所起的作用。
Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 20;22(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02066-2.
2
Comparing youth-friendly clinics to the standard of care for adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: A qualitative analysis.马拉维青年友好型诊所与少女和年轻女性标准护理的比较:一项定性分析。
Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2481466. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2481466. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Time trends in and factors associated with repeat adolescent birth in Uganda: Analysis of six demographic and health surveys.乌干达青少年重复生育的时间趋势及相关因素分析:六项人口与健康调查分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0231557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231557. eCollection 2020.
2
Contraception in adolescence: the influence of parity and marital status on contraceptive use in 73 low-and middle-income countries.青少年避孕:在 73 个中低收入国家中,生育状况和婚姻状况对避孕措施使用的影响。
Reprod Health. 2019 Feb 21;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0686-9.
3
Estimating abortion incidence among adolescents and differences in postabortion care by age: a cross-sectional study of postabortion care patients in Uganda.
Adolescent and youth-friendly health interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
中低收入国家青少年友好型卫生干预措施:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Sep 5;9(9):e013393. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013393.
4
The Challenge Initiative: Lessons on Rapid Scale-Up of Family Planning and Adolescent and Youth Sexual and Reproductive Health Services.挑战倡议:计划生育以及青少年和青年性与生殖健康服务快速扩大规模的经验教训。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 May 21;12(Suppl 2). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00153.
5
Acceptability of an Incentivized Peer Referral Intervention to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Adults in Yopougon-Est, Côte d'Ivoire.激励性同伴推荐干预措施在科特迪瓦约普贡-埃斯特地区解决成年人对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的可接受性。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Jun 27;12(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00468.
6
Harnessing the power of behavioural science to improve health.利用行为科学的力量改善健康状况。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Nov 1;99(11):754-754A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287375.
估算青少年堕胎发生率和不同年龄组堕胎后护理差异:乌干达堕胎后护理患者的横断面研究。
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):510-516. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.135. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
4
Interventions to improve the person-centered quality of family planning services: a narrative review.改善计划生育服务以人为本质量的干预措施:叙事性综述。
Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 28;15(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0592-6.
5
Assessing youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services: a systematic review.评估青少年友好型性与生殖健康服务:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2982-4.
6
Determinants of adolescent pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲青少年怀孕的决定因素:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jan 27;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0460-4.
7
What Does Not Work in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Review of Evidence on Interventions Commonly Accepted as Best Practices.青少年性健康和生殖健康中无效的措施:对普遍被认为是最佳实践的干预措施的证据进行综述。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Aug 31;3(3):333-40. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00126.
8
Youth-friendly primary-care services: how are we doing and what more needs to be done?青少年友好型初级保健服务:我们做得如何,还有哪些方面需要改进?
Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1565-1573. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60371-7.
9
Does making clinic-based reproductive health services more youth-friendly increase service use by adolescents? Evidence from Lusaka, Zambia.使基于诊所的生殖健康服务对年轻人更友好会增加青少年对服务的利用吗?来自赞比亚卢萨卡的证据。
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Oct;33(4):259-70. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00062-4.