Suppr超能文献

机器人内镜辅助结直肠肿瘤手术:一项可行性研究(附视频)。

Robotic endoscopic cooperative surgery for colorectal tumors: a feasibility study (with video).

机构信息

IRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):826-832. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08786-3. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative colorectal surgery (LECS-CR) is a promising technique to achieve full-thickness resection of colorectal tumors. This approach has shown good rates of complete resection and low local recurrence, especially for large laterally spreading tumors, which are difficult to remove via endoscopy alone. However, it is often difficult to prevent peritoneal leakage of intestinal content, causing infections and risks of cancer spreading. It was hypothesized that a robotic assistance could make the procedure easier and decrease intestinal fluid leakage. This preclinical trial aims to assess the feasibility of robotic and endoscopic cooperative colorectal surgery (RECS-CR).

METHODS

LECS-CR was performed in five female pigs and RECS-CR was also performed in five female pigs. With the animal under general anesthesia, pseudotumors were created on the colonic mucosa at a distance comprised between 20 and 25 cm from the anal verge. Desired resection margins were marked endoscopically and two stay sutures were placed either robotically or laparoscopically. A mucosa-to-submucosa dissection was performed endoscopically along the markings. Complete full-thickness dissection was performed cooperatively. The specimen was withdrawn endoscopically. The colon was closed using a self-fixating running suture. Abdominal contaminations, operating times, complications, and complete resections were evaluated and compared between LECS-CR and RECS-CR.

RESULTS

The mean number of colonies of Escherichia coli in the RECS group was significantly lower than in the LECS group (36.7 ± 30.2 vs. 142.2 ± 78.4, respectively, p < 0.05). Operating time was comparable (118 ± 11.2 vs. 98.6 ± 25.7, respectively, p = 0.22). Two stenoses occurred in the LECS group. R0 resection was achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that RECS-CR is feasible and has the potential to reduce intestinal content leakage, potentially preventing postoperative infections.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜内镜联合结直肠手术(LECS-CR)是一种有前途的技术,可以实现结直肠肿瘤的全层切除。这种方法显示出较高的完全切除率和较低的局部复发率,特别是对于单独内镜难以切除的大型侧向扩散肿瘤。然而,通常难以防止肠内容物的腹膜泄漏,导致感染和癌症扩散的风险。有人假设机器人辅助可以使手术更容易,并减少肠液泄漏。本临床前试验旨在评估机器人辅助和内镜联合结直肠手术(RECS-CR)的可行性。

方法

在五头雌性猪中进行 LECS-CR,在五头雌性猪中也进行 RECS-CR。在动物全身麻醉下,在距肛门缘 20-25cm 的结肠黏膜上创建假性肿瘤。内镜下标记所需的切除边缘,并放置两条缝线进行机器人或腹腔镜缝合。沿标记进行内镜下黏膜下剥离。进行全层协同性完全剥离。标本经内镜取出。使用自固定连续缝合关闭结肠。评估和比较 LECS-CR 和 RECS-CR 之间的腹部污染、手术时间、并发症和完全切除情况。

结果

RECS 组大肠杆菌菌落数明显低于 LECS 组(分别为 36.7±30.2 和 142.2±78.4,p<0.05)。手术时间相当(分别为 118±11.2 和 98.6±25.7,p=0.22)。LECS 组发生 2 例狭窄。所有病例均达到 R0 切除。

结论

本研究表明 RECS-CR 是可行的,有可能减少肠内容物泄漏,从而预防术后感染。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验