Suppr超能文献

用于纳入儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)反应量表的新面孔的开发与等效性研究。

Development and equivalence of new faces for inclusion in the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) response scale.

作者信息

Sully Kate, Bonner Nicola, Bradley Helena, von Maltzahn Robyn, Arbuckle Rob, Walker-Nthenda Louise, Mahon Aoife, Becker Brandon, O'Hara Louise, Bevans Katherine B, Kosinski Mark, Zeiger Robert S, Mackenzie Ross, Nelsen Linda

机构信息

Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.

Patient Centered Outcomes, Value Evidence Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, UK.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Nov 6;5(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00390-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate symptom monitoring is vital when managing pediatric asthma, providing an opportunity to improve control and relieve associated burden. The CHILDHOOD ASTHMA CONTROL TEST (C-ACT) has been validated for asthma control assessment in children; however, there are concerns that response option images used in the C-ACT are not culturally universal and could be misinterpreted. This cross-sectional, qualitative study developed and evaluated alternative response option images using interviews with children with asthma aged 4-11 years (and their parents/caregivers) in the United States, Spain, Poland, and Argentina. Interviews were conducted in two stages (with expert input) to evaluate the appropriateness, understanding and qualitative equivalence of the alternative images (both on paper and electronically). This included comparing the new images with the original C-ACT response scale, to provide context for equivalence results.

RESULTS

Alternative response option images included scale A (simple faces), scale B (circles of decreasing size), and scale C (squares of decreasing quantity). In Stage 1, most children logically ranked images using scales A, B and C (66.7%, 79.0% and 70.6%, respectively). However, some children ranked the images in scales B (26.7%) and C (58.3%) in reverse order. Slightly more children could interpret the images within the context of their asthma in scale B (68.4%) than A (55.6%) and C (47.5%). Based on Stage 1 results, experts recommended scales A (with slight modifications) and B be investigated further. In Stage 2, similar proportions of children logically ranked the images used in modified scales A (69.7%) and B (75.7%). However, a majority of children ranked the images in scale B in the reverse order (60.0%). Slightly more children were able to interpret the images in the context of their asthma using scale B (57.6%) than modified scale A (48.5%). Children and parents/caregivers preferred modified scale A over scale B (78.8% and 90.9%, respectively). Compared with the original C-ACT, most children selected the same response option on items using both scales, supporting equivalency. Following review of Stage 2 results, all five experts agreed modified scale A was the optimal response scale.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed alternative response option images for use in the C-ACT and provides qualitative evidence of the equivalency of these response options to the originals.

摘要

背景

在管理儿童哮喘时,准确的症状监测至关重要,它为改善控制和减轻相关负担提供了契机。儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)已被验证可用于评估儿童哮喘控制情况;然而,有人担心C-ACT中使用的反应选项图像并非文化通用,可能会被误解。这项横断面定性研究通过对美国、西班牙、波兰和阿根廷4至11岁哮喘儿童(及其父母/照顾者)进行访谈,开发并评估了替代反应选项图像。访谈分两个阶段进行(有专家参与),以评估替代图像(纸质和电子形式)的适宜性、可理解性和定性等效性。这包括将新图像与原始C-ACT反应量表进行比较,为等效性结果提供背景信息。

结果

替代反应选项图像包括量表A(简单面部表情)、量表B(尺寸递减的圆圈)和量表C(数量递减的方块)。在第一阶段,大多数儿童能按逻辑对使用量表A、B和C的图像进行排序(分别为66.7%、79.0%和70.6%)。然而,一些儿童对量表B(26.7%)和量表C(58.3%)中的图像排序相反。能在哮喘背景下理解量表B中图像的儿童(68.4%)略多于量表A(55.6%)和量表C(47.5%)。根据第一阶段结果,专家建议对量表A(稍作修改)和量表B作进一步研究。在第二阶段,按逻辑对修改后的量表A(69.7%)和量表B(75.7%)中的图像进行排序的儿童比例相似。然而,大多数儿童对量表B中的图像排序相反(60.0%)。能在哮喘背景下理解量表B中图像的儿童(57.6%)略多于修改后的量表A(48.5%)。儿童和父母/照顾者更喜欢修改后的量表A而非量表B(分别为78.8%和90.9%)。与原始C-ACT相比,大多数儿童在使用两种量表的项目上选择了相同的反应选项,支持等效性。在审查第二阶段结果后,所有五位专家一致认为修改后的量表A是最佳反应量表。

结论

本研究开发了用于C-ACT的替代反应选项图像,并提供了这些反应选项与原始图像等效性的定性证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9bf/8572277/7fefd4bd1e94/41687_2021_390_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验