• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本住院患者中成年糖尿病的亚分类的实用性。

Usefulness of subclassification of adult diabetes mellitus among inpatients in Japan.

机构信息

Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Apr;13(4):706-713. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13707. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1111/jdi.13707
PMID:34743418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9017630/
Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: We aimed to replicate a new diabetes subclassification based on objective clinical information at admission in a diabetes educational inpatient program. We also assessed the educational outcomes for each cluster.

METHODS

We included diabetes patients who participated in the educational inpatient program during 2009-2020 and had sufficient clinical information for the cluster analysis. We applied a data-driven clustering method proposed in a previous study and further evaluated the clinical characteristics of each cluster. We investigated the association between the clusters and changes in hemoglobin A1c level from the start of the education program. We also assessed the risk of re-admission for the educational program.

RESULTS

We divided a total of 651 patients into five clusters. Their clinical characteristics followed the same pattern as in previous studies. The intercluster ranking of the cluster center coordinates showed strong correlation coefficients with those of the previous studies (mean ρ = 0.88). Patients classified as severe insulin-resistant diabetes (cluster 3) showed a more pronounced progression of renal dysfunction than patients classified as the other clusters. The patients classified as severe insulin-deficient diabetes (cluster 2) had the highest rate of reduction in hemoglobin A1c level from the start of the program (P < 0.01) and a tendency toward a lower risk of re-admission for the education program (hazard ratio 0.47, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

We successfully replicated the diabetes subclassification using objective clinical information at admission for the education program. In addition, we showed that severe insulin-deficient diabetes patients tended to have better educational outcomes than patients classified as the other clusters.

摘要

目的/引言:我们旨在通过在糖尿病教育住院计划中入院时的客观临床信息复制一种新的糖尿病亚分类,并评估每个聚类的教育结果。

方法

我们纳入了 2009 年至 2020 年期间参加教育住院计划且聚类分析有足够临床信息的糖尿病患者。我们应用了先前研究中提出的数据驱动聚类方法,并进一步评估了每个聚类的临床特征。我们研究了聚类与教育计划开始时血红蛋白 A1c 水平变化之间的关系,并评估了再次参加教育计划的风险。

结果

我们将总共 651 名患者分为五个聚类。他们的临床特征与先前研究的模式相同。聚类中心坐标的聚类间排名与先前研究的相关性很强(平均 ρ=0.88)。被归类为严重胰岛素抵抗性糖尿病的患者(聚类 3)的肾功能恶化程度比其他聚类更明显。被归类为严重胰岛素缺乏性糖尿病的患者(聚类 2)从项目开始时的血红蛋白 A1c 水平降低幅度最高(P<0.01),并且再次参加教育计划的风险较低(危险比 0.47,P=0.09)。

结论

我们成功地使用入院时的客观临床信息复制了教育计划中的糖尿病亚分类。此外,我们表明严重胰岛素缺乏性糖尿病患者的教育效果倾向于优于其他聚类患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/9017630/04c0208cc706/JDI-13-706-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/9017630/17657dfbc475/JDI-13-706-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/9017630/11e5f38246ed/JDI-13-706-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/9017630/04c0208cc706/JDI-13-706-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/9017630/17657dfbc475/JDI-13-706-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/9017630/11e5f38246ed/JDI-13-706-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/699a/9017630/04c0208cc706/JDI-13-706-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Usefulness of subclassification of adult diabetes mellitus among inpatients in Japan.日本住院患者中成年糖尿病的亚分类的实用性。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Apr;13(4):706-713. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13707. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
2
Type 2 diabetes classification: a data-driven cluster study of the Danish Centre for Strategic Research in Type 2 Diabetes (DD2) cohort.2型糖尿病分类:基于丹麦2型糖尿病战略研究中心(DD2)队列的数据驱动聚类研究
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Apr;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002731.
3
Application of new international classification of adult-onset diabetes in Chinese inpatients with diabetes mellitus.成人发病型糖尿病新国际分类在中国糖尿病住院患者中的应用。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021 Oct;37(7):e3427. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3427. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
4
Identification of two novel subgroups in patients with diabetes mellitus and their association with clinical outcomes: A two-step cluster analysis.两步聚类分析鉴定糖尿病患者的两个新亚组及其与临床结局的关系。
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Aug;12(8):1346-1358. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13494. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
5
HbA1c measurement may save COVID-19 inpatients from overlooked diabetes.糖化血红蛋白检测可能使 COVID-19 住院患者免于被忽视的糖尿病。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Nov;13(11):1925-1933. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13869. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
6
Novel Subgroups and Chronic Complications of Diabetes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese:A Prospective Cohort Study.中年和老年中国人的新型糖尿病亚组和慢性并发症:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 26;12:802114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.802114. eCollection 2021.
7
Diabetes education program for people with type 2 diabetes: An international perspective.2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病教育项目:国际视角
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Jun;56:64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
8
Validation of the classification for type 2 diabetes into five subgroups: a report from the ORIGIN trial.2型糖尿病分为五个亚组的分类验证:来自ORIGIN试验的报告。
Diabetologia. 2022 Jan;65(1):206-215. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05567-4. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
Prescribing Patterns and Response to Antihyperglycemic Agents Among Novel Clusters of Type 2 Diabetes in Asian Indians.亚洲印度人2型糖尿病新集群中的处方模式及对抗高血糖药物的反应
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Mar;24(3):190-200. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0277. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Insulin Requirements in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Undergoing Bariatric Surgery in the Inpatient Setting and Upon Discharge: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Insulin Management Strategies.住院和出院期间接受减重手术的 2 型糖尿病患者的胰岛素需求:胰岛素管理策略的单中心回顾性分析。
Endocr Pract. 2021 Jun;27(6):538-544. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2020.12.014. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cluster Analysis in Diabetes Research: A Systematic Review Enhanced by a Cross-Sectional Study.糖尿病研究中的聚类分析:一项横断面研究增强的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3588. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103588.
2
Investigation of the degree of family history of diabetes in different clusters of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in Thailand.泰国新诊断2型糖尿病不同聚类中糖尿病家族史程度的调查。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2500697. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2500697. Epub 2025 May 8.
3
Pathophysiological hallmarks in type 2 diabetes heterogeneity (review).

本文引用的文献

1
Replication and cross-validation of type 2 diabetes subtypes based on clinical variables: an IMI-RHAPSODY study.基于临床变量的 2 型糖尿病亚型的复制和验证:一项 IMI-RHAPSODY 研究。
Diabetologia. 2021 Sep;64(9):1982-1989. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05490-8. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Comparison between data-driven clusters and models based on clinical features to predict outcomes in type 2 diabetes: nationwide observational study.基于临床特征的与数据驱动聚类和模型比较预测 2 型糖尿病结局:全国性观察研究。
Diabetologia. 2021 Sep;64(9):1973-1981. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05485-5. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
Validation of the Swedish Diabetes Re-Grouping Scheme in Adult-Onset Diabetes in China.
2型糖尿病异质性的病理生理特征(综述)
Diabetol Int. 2024 Dec 19;16(2):201-222. doi: 10.1007/s13340-024-00783-w. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.2型糖尿病的精准亚分类:一项系统综述
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Oct 5;3(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00360-3.
瑞典糖尿病重新分组方案在中国成人发病型糖尿病中的验证
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Oct 1;105(10). doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa524.
4
Factors Associated with Risk of Diabetic Complications in Novel Cluster-Based Diabetes Subgroups: A Japanese Retrospective Cohort Study.基于新型聚类的糖尿病亚组中糖尿病并发症风险的相关因素:一项日本回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 2;9(7):2083. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072083.
5
Risk of diabetes-associated diseases in subgroups of patients with recent-onset diabetes: a 5-year follow-up study.近期诊断糖尿病患者亚组中糖尿病相关疾病的风险:一项为期 5 年的随访研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Sep;7(9):684-694. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30187-1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Disease progression and treatment response in data-driven subgroups of type 2 diabetes compared with models based on simple clinical features: an analysis using clinical trial data.基于临床试验数据的分析:与基于简单临床特征的模型相比,数据驱动的 2 型糖尿病亚组的疾病进展和治疗反应。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;7(6):442-451. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30087-7. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
7
Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2016.《2016年日本糖尿病临床实践指南》
Diabetol Int. 2018 Mar 27;9(1):1-45. doi: 10.1007/s13340-018-0345-3. eCollection 2018 Feb.
8
Accurate diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and new paradigms of classification.糖尿病的准确诊断与新的分类范式
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Jul;14(7):386-387. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0025-1.
9
Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables.基于六个变量的聚类分析:成人发病型糖尿病的新型亚组及其与结局的关系
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 May;6(5):361-369. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30051-2. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040.国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图:2015年和2040年全球糖尿病患病率估计
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 31.